🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠💡🔠🔠🔠💡🔠🔠🔠🔠❗️

Channel
🎙 ДА НЕТ НАВЕРНОЕ
@yesnomaybepodcast
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
324subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001343528783 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yesnomaybepodcast |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 27 October 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yesnomaybepodcast |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 324 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 327 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 327 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 27 October 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 8 | 53.3% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2020 to 1 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yesnomaybepodcast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 October 2020 to 1 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Сменился адрес моего нового блога и на геи новая интересная статья про мировую угрозу монополий AI. https://restless-brain.com
🔥2
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🅱️🔠🅰️🔠🔠 Всем привет. Почти 4 года мы с вами не слышались. Половина читателей разбрелась по своим более интересным делам и это отлично. Многое поменялось и у меня, но про это позже. Я решил возобновить привычку делиться с вами интересными вещами и теперь делаю это на платформе Substack и на английском языке. Более половины жизни я на нём живу и работаю, да и нетворк всё больше англоязычный. ¯\_(ツ)_…
👏6🔥6❤1
Друзья, слушатели, С Новым годом. 🎊🎉 Когда утром вы откроете «ленты» и на вас выплеснется мёд итогов года, успешный успех и постановочные семейные фото, то не парьтесь. На самом деле это значит совсем противоположное. И просто относитесь к этому как вою несчастных. Мой год был невероятно сложным, но по итогу все стало лучше, чем можно мечтать. Видос: хз где я его взял.
Нужен ли подкаст про Roam Research, который я считаю лучшим инструментом продуктивности из всего увиденного и изученного за эти годы.
- Да, конечно84%
- Нет, мне такое не надо5%
- Мне всё-равно11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Привет! Совсем нет времени и настроения пока делать подкасты. Попал в ситуацию когда от работы и её темпа не хочется отвлекаться. В информационном перегрузе невиданного для меня масштаба, я нашел инструмент Roam Research, который стал для меня не просто вторым мозгом. Он стал второй нейронной мыслительной сетью. Очень-очень рекомендую вам в новогодние праздники найти время и разобраться с ним. Если будет интерес, т…
Если вы слышали мой подкаст про Bitcoin когда его курс был $7,000, то что сделали после прослушивания?
- Купил себе один или больше и теперь доволен 🥰9%
- Купил менее 1 BTC и рад жизни 😘15%
- Подумал, что Слава €6анулся и забыл 🤯25%
- До сих пор уверен, что надо держаться подальше от Темы 🥸42%
- ВЫ ВСЕ ПОЖАЛЕЕТЕ, ЧТО СВЯЗАЛИСЬ С ЭТИМИ ИДЕЯМИ 🤬18%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Конечно, мы можем поговорить про мотивацию в команде или про личную эффективность, обсудить экономику умирающей постсоветской страны или порешать чей борщ. А можем просто сходить в выпуск замечательного подкаста «ДА НЕТ НАВЕРНОЕ» про Биткоин. Там вы услышите как я в скучном монологе рассказываю почему Биткоин это штука, которая построена настолько совершенно, что дело времени когда его стоимость улетит through the ro…
Photo, posted without a caption
Самое классное объяснение разницы меджу Данными, Информацией, Знанием, Инсайтом, Мудростью и Теориями заговора 🙂
Готовим новый выпуск. С такими помощникамми — скоро будет 🙂
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yesnomaybepodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нужен ли подкаст про Roam Research, который я считаю лучшим инструментом продуктивности из всего увиденного и изученного за эти годы.
- Да, конечно84%
- Нет, мне такое не надо5%
- Мне всё-равно11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Если вы слышали мой подкаст про Bitcoin когда его курс был $7,000, то что сделали после прослушивания?
- Купил себе один или больше и теперь доволен 🥰9%
- Купил менее 1 BTC и рад жизни 😘15%
- Подумал, что Слава €6анулся и забыл 🤯25%
- До сих пор уверен, что надо держаться подальше от Темы 🥸42%
- ВЫ ВСЕ ПОЖАЛЕЕТЕ, ЧТО СВЯЗАЛИСЬ С ЭТИМИ ИДЕЯМИ 🤬18%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2020 to 1 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎙 ДА НЕТ НАВЕРНОЕ” (@yesnomaybepodcast), 324 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yesnomaybepodcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.