Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net +408. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,584–14,156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 00:56
14,068
-22
4 Nov 2026, 02:10
14,090
+2
2 Nov 2026, 23:30
14,088
+16
2 Nov 2026, 00:28
14,072
+2
1 Nov 2026, 01:56
14,070
-5
31 Oct 2026, 05:17
14,075
+4
30 Oct 2026, 04:40
14,071
+2
29 Oct 2026, 06:51
14,069
-7
28 Oct 2026, 01:20
14,076
-3
27 Oct 2026, 01:07
14,079
+4
25 Oct 2026, 23:37
14,075
+1
24 Oct 2026, 23:16
14,074
+4
24 Oct 2026, 00:45
14,070
+3
22 Oct 2026, 23:46
14,067
+10
22 Oct 2026, 01:01
14,057
+39
20 Oct 2026, 21:41
14,018
-3
19 Oct 2026, 20:30
14,021
+1
18 Oct 2026, 23:56
14,020
+16
17 Oct 2026, 23:06
14,004
+3
17 Oct 2026, 01:06
14,001
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 14,068 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,590
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
57 (4 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
32,270
Reactions total
917
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 05:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,430
Videos
≈26
Links
≈286
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21m 21s
Average length
21m 21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,462 reactions across 57 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,671
59.9%
🔥
848
19.0%
👍
357
8.00%
🥰
171
3.83%
👏
112
2.51%
🕊
101
2.26%
😁
90
2.02%
😢
47
1.05%
🤔
33
0.74%
🌭
19
0.426%
🍾
13
0.291%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,462 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Через Лабораторию фотографии прошло >700 человек. Это много.
Накопилось достаточно наблюдений, чтобы сделать выводы: проблема ребят не в технике, не в насмотренности (это накапливается), а в страхах. Избавившись от них, ребята улетают в космос.
Я позвал Машу поговорить о страхах в творчестве, критике, пути начинающих и о психологии в целом.
Маша — потрясающий психолог, которая может часами увлекательно рассказыват…
Привет! Это я, напомнить о всяких полезных ссылках — полный дайджест в закрепе.
Выделю некоторое:
— ChatGPT: полная инструкция как начать. От установки до оплаты.
— Play: тренажер Лаборатории. Настройки камеры, свет, проявка. Классно для начинающих.
— Видео ТОП «ошибок» и как их исправить. За 1 час без всяких курсов и смс улучшите свои навыки.
— Видео Страхи и мифы в фотографии. Коронный стендап в Foto One, кото…
Некоторые картинки с последнего разбора 12-го потока Лаборатории фотографии.
Авторы: Людмила Медникова, Дмитрий Божко, Константин Ивкин, Екатерина Козлова, Андрей Бурханов, Елизавета Хромова, Марта Несмеянова, Сергей Черногорский, Мария Ивасенко, Роман Волков.
На наших глазах происходит глобальная революция, которая изменит весь мир и всю экономику в самое ближайшее время.
Уверенное владение нейросетями станет базовым минимумом для любого офисного сотрудника. Каждое собеседование будет начинаться с вопроса «Расскажите, как вы оптимизируете свою работу и используете нейросети».
Я — фанат эффективности и оптимизации. Я стремителен во всём, кроме соития и винопития (но это …
Картинка Влада Клименко
Просмотр, разбор, обсуждение снятого в Узбекистане стартуем сегодня в 20.00 МСК.
Ссылка на встречу в Zoom придет в @lukaonline_bot (спама не будет, не бойтесь)
Привет! Приглашаю вас на единственную в интернете встречу, где вам не будут ничего продавать.
20-го октября, в 20.00 МСК встречаемся в Zoom на рассказ об Узбекистане и просмотр наших серий. Будем смотреть что получилось и, главное, что не получилось.
Запись в боте @lukaonline_bot. Бот напомнит день в день, а за 15 минут до встречи пришлет ссылку. Без спама. Запись встречи будет, придет так же в бота.
Обнял.
Всё, что вы хотели знать о Лаборатории фотографии — на обновленном сайте.
Подход, процесс, результат и жизнь лаборантов внутри комьюнити.
13-й поток Лаборатории стартует 1-го февраля 2027, если мы с вами доживем. Это будет незабываемо.
Программа курса обновляется, но мои принципы неизменны — никаких кураторов, прогревов и подарков за покупку. Все встречи живьем, а все материалы доступны всем тарифам навсегда. Да, …
Использование перспективы — простейший приём придания картинке объёма и, по моим наблюдениям, сильно недооцененный среди начинающих фотографов.
Посмотрите на вторую и третью картинку с резидентом группировки мсье Тимофеем. Простое смещение относительно героя или сюжета сделает картинку объёмнее без всяких курсов и смс.
Обнял.
На мой взгляд, не должен. Фотография разная: она может быть документом, иллюстрацией, авторским высказыванием, элементом исследования и т.д., а может быть просто музыкой для глаз: зарисовкой, не более.
При этом один автор может одновременно снимать совершенно разное. Я вон цветочки тоже люблю снимать, и кто мне может запретить это делать?
Фотография вообще никому ничего не должна, равно как и автор фотографии тоже.…
В поисках ответов на вечные вопросы полезно обращаться к прошлому опыту. Великолепная, но достаточно тяжелая эмоционально книга.
И хорошо подтверждает то что во все времена независимо от страны люди примерно одинаковые.
Закончилась одиссея группировки стрит-клуб по Узбекистану. Память о нас останется в веках. Пришло время разбирать материал и собирать серии.
10 дней, два города (Бухара и Хива), >75 000 картинок суммарно у всех участников, море впечатлений и смеха.
В октябре проведу прямой эфир: разберу свои картинки, покажу серии ребят, которые тоже подключатся и расскажут о своих впечатлениях и полученном опыте.
Stay tuned
❤92🔥47👍11🥰4
Signed Luka Butomo
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @yesmagnum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wfolio + Фотография = ❤️ @wfolio · 19,001 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Luka Butomo | Photography” (@yesmagnum), 14,068 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yesmagnum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.