Поговорили с Лукой о психологии, страхах и творчестве. Кажется, получилось интересно:) Приходите смотреть
❤11🔥7👍4🦄3💔1

Channel
@mentalmilk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,992subscribers
-245 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001346834803 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mentalmilk |
| Description | Люди меняются. Это моя работа. Попасть на личную консультацию: @masha_poly По вопросам рекламы: @mentaladmin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mentalmilk |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:19 | 7,992 | -12 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:37 | 8,004 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:01 | 8,009 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 8,019 | +1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:48 | 8,018 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 8,027 | -9 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 8,036 | -12 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:10 | 8,048 | -14 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 21:01 | 8,062 | -22 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 8,084 | -43 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 8,127 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 8,140 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 8,155 | -11 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 8,166 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:04 | 8,176 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 8,183 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 8,191 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 8,195 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 8,198 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 8,205 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (25 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 8,811 |
| Reactions total | 547 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 11:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,817 reactions across 33 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,285 | 45.6% | |
| 💯 | 422 | 15.0% | |
| 💔 | 363 | 12.9% | |
| 👍 | 244 | 8.66% | |
| 🔥 | 240 | 8.52% | |
| 😢 | 83 | 2.95% | |
| 😁 | 82 | 2.91% | |
| 🦄 | 67 | 2.38% | |
| 👀 | 31 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,817 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mentalmilk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Поговорили с Лукой о психологии, страхах и творчестве. Кажется, получилось интересно:) Приходите смотреть
❤11🔥7👍4🦄3💔1
Я не могу сделать твою боль меньше. Но я могу помочь тебе стать больше твоей боли.
❤58🔥9🦄7
В моём окружении удивительно много людей, которые когда-то хотели пойти в искусство. Рисовать, заниматься театром, изучать живопись. Но сначала надо было получить «нормальное образование». Родители хотели надёжности. Понятной профессии, диплома, с которым ребёнок точно не пропадёт. Их тревогу можно понять, но собственное желание от этого никуда не девалось. Потом появлялась работа. Потом семья, дети, больше обязанн…
❤16🦄5🔥4💯1
Возможно, вы сейчас измотаны, устали, с трудом соображаете и вообще, кажется, что перестали справляться с этой жизнью. Это не значит, что вам надо как-то получше взять себя в руки и собраться. Это не тот момент, когда вам надо усилить дисциплину, начать пораньше вставать и добавить ежедневные тренировки. Вам надо от себя отстать и нормально отдохнуть.
❤77🔥12🦄12💯6👍4👀1
Не знаю, понравится вам эта информация или нет, но измены случаются и в отношениях, где людям хорошо. Где они любят друг друга, смеются за ужином и строят планы на отпуск. Как так? Начнём с теории саморасширения Артура и Элейн Арон. Если совсем коротко: человеку свойственно стремление расширять своё «Я» — осваивать новые навыки, примерять новые роли, получать новые знания и опыт. Один из самых мощных способов тако…
❤56👍18🔥9💯8😢1
А отличаются ли роли мужчины-любовника и женщины-любовницы? Очень. Но сразу оговорюсь: дальше речь о среднем по палате. В жизни бывают исключения, и я это прекрасно понимаю. Тем не менее общие закономерности прослеживаются чётко. Мужчина приходит в треугольник за настоящим: чтобы здесь и сейчас было хорошо. Женщина приходит за будущим: чтобы однажды он ушёл от жены и остался с ней. Отсюда всё остальное: Женщина ст…
❤39💯21👍20🔥3🦄1
Как так получается, что люди добровольно соглашаются на роль второго плана? Почему человек вдруг выбирает быть чьим-то секретом? За «просто так получилось» и «я на всё согласна, потому что без него не могу» всегда стоит сложный внутренний бессознательный процесс, который не выведен на уровень сознательного. Ну например: Зачастую любовники боятся близости с другим человеком больше, чем одиночества. И быть неофициаль…
❤40💯15💔11🔥2
Напишите, пожалуйста, про измены как семейный стабилизатор. Давай посмотрим на это с точки зрения семейной психологии, оставив мораль за бортом. Задача семейной системы (как и любой другой) — выжить и сохранить гомеостаз, то есть равновесие. Но любая долгосрочная пара рано или поздно сталкивается с кризисом: рутина, быт, накопленные обиды. Система перегревается. Ей нужно «сбросить пар», иначе взорвётся — разводом, …
💔31❤15🔥11👍8
СЕМЕЙНЫЕ СТАБИЛИЗАТОРЫ Как и любые другие стабилизаторы, они удерживают стабильность и равновесие в системе. Семейные стабилизаторы необходимы для сохранения семьи и придания ей прочности. Стабилизаторы, как и семьи, бывают функциональные и дисфункциональные. И если функциональные стабилизаторы укрепляют семью, то дисфункциональные служат для того, чтобы семью удержать. И это огромная разница. С функциональными ст…
❤22👀13👍9💔6
НЕ ГОВОРИ НЕ ДОВЕРЯЙ НЕ ЧУВСТВУЙ Это три негласных правила, которые часто приняты в дисфункциональных семьях. не говори «Молоко на губах не обсохло», «дети молчат, когда взрослые разговаривают», «будь потише», «вот вырастешь – тогда и будешь своё мнение высказывать». А можно ребёнка просто игнорировать, и этим приучить к молчанию. В дисфункциональных семьях не принято прямо говорить о своих чувствах и мыслях. Любая…
💯39💔26❤15😢1
ДИСФУНКЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ СЕМЬЯ Часто первая ассоциация – это материально неблагополучная семья, где есть ещё и зависимый родитель. Бывает и так, но это вовсе не обязательные условия. Дисфункциональная семья – это та, которая не справляется со своими функциями. Что характерно для дисфункциональной семьи? ❤️Жёсткие правила поведения и роли каждого члена семьи, менять их не позволяют. ❤️Абсолютная власть главы семьи. ❤️Мног…
😢25💯20💔13❤10
СЕМЕЙНЫЕ ТАЙНЫ Семейные тайны крепко связаны с семейными мифами. Или миф строится вокруг тайны, или тайна существует для того, чтобы миф оберегать, но одного без другого практически не бывает. Семейные тайны – это информация которую решили хранить в секрете и прилагать усилия для его сохранения. Это может быть тайна одного члена семьи от всех или тайна, которую семья хранит от внешнего мира, но, пожалуй, самый расп…
❤23💯14🔥7😢4👍1💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @mentalmilk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Свингеры, куколды, открытый брак, легальные измены.. рассказать про это?)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ментальное молоко” (@mentalmilk), 7,992 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentalmilk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.