Channel
@yesdim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
86subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001288073617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yesdim |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yesdim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 86 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 87 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 87 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
162 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 99 | 61.1% | |
| custom 5233253406331658772 | 31 | 19.1% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 6.17% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 4.32% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 2.47% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| custom 5213147732411166227 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.617% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yesdim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 December 2025 to 21 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
КОРООООЧЕ. Несмотря на то, что для захода в приложение Authy для 2FA нужно отсканировать код на твич, можно зайти в это приложение, получить код на свой номер, что приложение связалось с твоим номером телефона, а потом уже в него приходит код от твича. Поддержка ни с чем не помогла, отписались, мол, мы что-то там сделали, извините, что не получилось зайти. В итоге все сам решил. Надо долбиться в приложение Authy крч …
❤1
Как же бесит твич, и тема с запретом в РФ отправлять смс с кодом для подтверждения двухфакторной аутентификации. У меня слетел акк твича на компе, и из-за этого я не могу зайти на твич, и не могу зайти в донейшн алертс, в который у меня был логин через твич. Чел задонатил мне 100 рублей на майн сервер, я даже посмотреть не могу. Я менял через почту пароль на твиче, но в этом нет смысла, т.к. даже чтобы зайти на твич …
❤2🔥1
На прошлой неделе в рамках проекта FGY Mine Server был тестовый закуп рекламы на 8к рублей, чтобы на одном мониторинге мы поднялись на 10-15 место на 7 дней. Решил просчитать стоимость квал лида. В совокупности у нас было 300-350 копирований IP, на сервер зашло за неделю около 100 новых игроков, стоимость квал лида составила 80-100 руб. Считаю, это успех. Количество подписчиков в канале севера тг возросло с 85 до 90…
❤5🔥3custom 52332534063316587721
Я тут задумался. Искренне не понимаю, почему люди ведут соц.сети без задачи заработать на этом деньги или получить иной профит. Не понимаю институт щитпостинга, как будто это полная хуйня, нет? Лично мне как потребителю, было бы интересно посмотреть как живёт мой друг или что он делает в жизни, но чтобы я просто так начал делиться своей жизнью с неограниченным кругом людей без цели или задачи в перспективе или момент…
😁5👍1custom 52332534063316587721
удалил(-а) Вас из канала
😁5custom 52332534063316587725❤2😢2😭2
3,2,1..
❤8custom 52332534063316587721
Отбой. Скачал SoundCloud, там такое давно реализовано))) Переходите тоже
❤2custom 52332534063316587721
Уважаемые граждане, а именно представители сильного пола (девушки). От всей души поздравляю Вас с праздником свободы и справедливости, Вашим днем, международным днем защиты прав женщин и эмансипации. Желаю Вам больше справедливости в жизни, хоть вроде уже юридически права равны, все равно остаются моменты, куда можно расти. Хоть право электорального голоса, право на образование, право на работу и иные уже есть, все…
❤15custom 52332534063316587722
Video message, posted without a caption
❤12custom 52332534063316587723custom 52131477324111662271
Почему до сих пор никто не додумался добавить комментарии на стриминговые платформы музыки? Это была бы имба. Я просто представляю комменты в яндекс музыке после 1 марта
❤6custom 52332534063316587722
Telegram начали блокировать со вчерашнего дня, вчера стали медленно грузиться файлы, до этого заблочили звонки, сейчас уже большие сообщения с задержкой отправляются. Сегодня в пятёрочке начали крутить рекламу государственного мессендежра. К сожалению, часть бизнеса перейдёт в него, чтобы скуфы-клиенты могли к ним обращаться. FGY MAXимализировать свой комфорт и заниматься хуйней не будет. Поэтому качайте РКН, устан…
❤2🔥1custom 52332534063316587721
ИИшница У меня всё.
❤6🤡4custom 52332534063316587722
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yesdim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 131,927 of 1,602,868entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YESDIM” (@yesdim), 86 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yesdim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.