Channel
@yeovulation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
325subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003064386765 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yeovulation |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yeovulation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 325 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 324 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,292 |
| Reactions total | 425 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
425 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5380071082319436554 | 110 | 25.9% | |
| custom 5235920843015467640 | 91 | 21.4% | |
| custom 5445097424051800558 | 68 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5440412688473698656 | 64 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5440639522876466692 | 45 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5442919377416530069 | 35 | 8.24% | |
| custom 5440769054795146008 | 12 | 2.82% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 425reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ну если кокетливо 🤩 нет, я помню, но у меня правда сейчас нет времени. если завтрашний вечер выдастся свободным, можно будет провести, но ничего не обещаю
custom 544509742405180055811custom 54404126884736986566custom 53800710823194365544
и ёсан уже тут как тут 😭 поздравил минги под динеро и детскую песенку. 🌟 :: минги-я, с днём рождения 😎
custom 544509742405180055812custom 52359208430154676407custom 53800710823194365546custom 54404126884736986565
ateez поднялись в рейтинге репутации мужских групп и заняли 2-е место! 22-е место → 18-е место → 13-е место → 2-е место теперь они сразу за BTS!! безумно горжусь ими. после них идут кортис и севентин. 📌 индекс участия: 286 810 📌 индекс медиа: 435 959 📌 индекс коммуникации: 1 222 784 📌 индекс сообщества: 733 046 Общий индекс репутации бренда: 2 678 598 По сравнению с июльским показателем в 1 311 279, индекс тизов в…
custom 538007108231943655411custom 54404126884736986564custom 54407690547951460084custom 54429193774165300694
с днём рождения нашего любимого минги ! 🌟
custom 538007108231943655410custom 54404126884736986566custom 54406395228764666924custom 54450974240518005583
❓ :: что вы почувствовали, когда заняли первое место в BB200 в 3-й раз? 🌟 :: когда альбом вышел и занял первое место, даже несмотря на то, что мы уже несколько раз занимали верхушку чарта, я думаю, что восторг и радость всегда абсолютно те же. я правда был очень горд.
custom 544041268847369865615custom 52359208430154676406custom 54429193774165300695custom 53800710823194365544
❓ :: спустя 8 лет с момента дебюта, как вы ощущаете изменения в к-попе? 🌟 :: я думаю, что чувство ответственности тоже выросло. и я не знаю, можно ли действительно назвать это минусом, но мне кажется, что давление тоже становится всё сильнее и сильнее. когда мы что-то делаем, мы задаёмся вопросом: «понравится ли нашим эйтини эта наша сторона? понравится ли им эта музыка?»
custom 523592084301546764014custom 53800710823194365545custom 54429193774165300695custom 54450974240518005583custom 54404126884736986561
❓ :: помогли ли вам в итоге трудности, с которыми вы столкнулись в начале пути? 🌟 :: в самом начале, поскольку мы никогда не знали, когда для нас всё может закончиться.. я думаю, именно поэтому мы были максимально искренними на сцене. 🌟 :: ещё я считаю, что у каждого из участников был огромный потенциал, и нам действительно всеми силами хотелось сделать так, чтобы об ateez узнало как можно больше людей.
custom 523592084301546764010custom 53800710823194365545custom 54429193774165300695custom 54407690547951460083custom 54404126884736986562
❓ :: непрерывные мировые туры день за днём… какова реакция зарубежной публики? 🌟 :: есть те, кто поддерживают нас, топая ногами, и вообще существует огромнейшее количество самых разных способов выразить поддержку. но я верю, что в глубине души то чувство, с которым они хотят поддержать ateez, всегда совершенно одинаковое. даже если способы нас поддерживать различаются, их любовь к нам остается прежней.
custom 544063952287646669215custom 52359208430154676406custom 54429193774165300695custom 54450974240518005583custom 54404126884736986561
[ 🎬 ] culture inside / «думали, что "bad" выстрелит?»... ateez: «99% труда, 1% удачи» / ytn ❓ :: какой вы хотите, чтобы запомнили вашу группу? 🌟 :: мне бы очень хотелось, чтобы однажды кто-то сказал: «благодаря ateez я действительно был(а) счастлив(а)». и чтобы когда люди думали о к-попе, если кто-то спросит: «какая группа приходит вам на ум? группа, которая действительно запала вам в душу?», я бы хотел, чтобы в это…
custom 523592084301546764013custom 54406395228764666925custom 53800710823194365544custom 54450974240518005582custom 54404126884736986561
мы с подругой решили, что я переведу части с ёсаном, а она поможет с остальным (она полиглот). к понедельнику сделаю видео с сабами ❤️
custom 544509742405180055811custom 52359208430154676405custom 53800710823194365544custom 54404126884736986561
видео уже доступно по ссылке: https://youtu.be/TsOs2QzwstU?si=cN5Cc1c9LqVnh9iR субтитров там нет, но я могу сделать, если будет перевод. вам нужно полное видео с субтитрами или просто разобрать части с ёсаном?
custom 538007108231943655415custom 54404126884736986569custom 52359208430154676408custom 54406395228764666923
кстати, сегодня ёсан должен появиться в программе «culture inside» вместе с Хонджуном, Сонхва и Саном в 15:20 по мск на ютуб канале ytn news
custom 538007108231943655414custom 54404126884736986565custom 54429193774165300693custom 54407690547951460082
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @yeovulation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 558,347 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⊹ k͟a͟n͟g͟ y͟e͟o͟s͟a͟n͟g ``” (@yeovulation), 325 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yeovulation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.