๐โแแณแฝแ แแตแแแณแฝแ แขแจแฑแต แญแญแตแถแต แจแฅแแฑ แจแ แตแตแต แตแแแ แแญแซแแ แจแแแญแซแฑ แแญ แจแแแ แญแแ แ แแแฝแ แ แแ แ แฐแญแ แคแต แฐแแแถ แแแแ แแญแ แ แ แซแฐแจแแ แต แจแฐแญแ แฐแแถ แจแแ แจแ แแ แแ แญ ?

Channel
๐ตแคแแฎแญ แแฎแแฝแ๐ต
@yemariam_lijoche
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
18,446subscribers
+668 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001164060383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yemariam_lijoche |
| Created | 4 September 2020 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yemariam_lijoche |
Topic
Education โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:07 | 18,446 | -29 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:09 | 18,475 | +16 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:50 | 18,459 | +3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 18,456 | +22 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:18 | 18,434 | -41 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:44 | 18,475 | +27 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:10 | 18,448 | +36 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:28 | 18,412 | -12 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 18,424 | +32 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:20 | 18,392 | +22 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:59 | 18,370 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:25 | 18,377 | -21 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 18,398 | +44 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:29 | 18,354 | +24 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:17 | 18,330 | +4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:18 | 18,326 | +13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 18,313 | +16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 18,297 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:41 | 18,301 | +12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 18,289 | first reading |
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 4 September 2020 โ the reader has reached the start of this channelโs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 54 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 0.088%
- avg views รท 18,446 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16.2
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.67%
- reactions รท views ยท ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (4 September 2020 โ 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 210 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 27 | 75.0% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 13.9% | |
| โก | 2 | 5.56% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 2.78% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2020 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 0 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
โ แ แแ online แแแฝแ แฅแป แฅแซแแ แแแต แแตแตแญ แแแแแญ แแโ๏ธ 1๏ธโฃ แแแฃ 100 แฅแญ แซแญแต 2๏ธโฃ แแแฃ 50 แฅแญ แซแญแต 3๏ธโฃ แแแฃ 25 แฅแญ แซแญแต โก๏ธ แแแ แจแแแฝแ แแแญ แจแแแแ แญแซแแข๐
โโญ๏ธแจแ แแญ แแตแขแญ แฅแ แซแแฐแแแจแแธแ แจแฅแแต แ แ แ แฅแแแตโก๏ธ โแจแแแญแ แจแจแจแ แแญแถแฝ แ แตแญแญแ แฅแแดแต แญแแ แซแโ๏ธ แขแตแฎแตแซแแซแ แแแแแตแต แจแแแแ แณแญแแต แ แแญ แแ แ แตแแซแ แฅแแต แแ แซแธแโ๏ธ โแแแฑแ แ แแแค แแฒแต แถ/แญ แฎแณแต แณแฐแฐ ยซแ แแตแฎแแณยป แแฝแแ แแ แแฒแคแ (PDF) แแตแฅ แซแแแณแ ๐ ๐๐ โ๐ Book_Mereja.t.me โ๐ Book_Mereja.t.me
๐แจ17 แฐแแ แ แแ แญแ แแ แจ 200 แฅแญ แซแญแต แจแแซแธแแ แฅแซแ! แจแแคแต_แ แแ แณ แจแฐแฃแแ แแ แแ ?
โค1
๐แฐแ แฒแแแต แแตแแ แแ แญ แญแแ แแตแแแฝ แ แฐแจแแช แแณแฝแ แแตแแแณแฝแ แขแจแฑแต แญแญแตแถแตยซแฅแ แแณ แแ แ แแแฉแ แ แแแ แฃ แแฝแแ แ แฑแต แฐแ แญแแแ แญแแยป แฅแแแฒแ แแฅแซแแณแแฑ แจแแตแแ แแแแฃ แฅแซแ แ แฅแแข แแแต แแแแแต แจแแแ แญแ แ แปแแ แญแแแแแข แจแฐแ แจแแ แแ แแ แ แฑแต แแ แแญ แแญแ แ ? แ แแต แ แ แฅแป แ แแ แแแ แจแแฃแช แแ แฐแฅแ แ แแตแแแฝ แจแแณแแแ แ แ แ แ แแแ 4 แแญแแต แ แแแฝ แ แแต.....READ MORE
แจแแแช แ แคแ แแญแฅแฅแ แตแแ แจแแแฌแแฝแ แตแซแแฝแ แแแแต แญแแแแแ โ๏ธแแแแแต แญแแแแแข๐๐
๐ซ๐แแแณ แแแตแ แดแต แขแแแฑ แญแญแตแตแ แฅแแดแต แญแแณแโ๏ธ ๐แดแต แ แแญ แ แ แฃ แแแตโ๏ธ ๐ แแแต แ แแ แแแต แขแซแแฅแแ แแตแแต แแ แญแจแญแณแ โ๏ธ ๐ แฐแฃแฑ แ แฝแแแต แฅแแแ แแธแโ๏ธ ๐ แ แแตแฑ แ แแแฐ แแตแขแซแต แแ แแธแโ๏ธ ๐ แจแ แตแญแฑ แตแแแแต แแช แซแแ แตแแแ แแแโ๏ธ โช๏ธแจแฅแญแแฐ แคแฐ แญแญแตแฒแซแ แ แแแญ แแแฑแ แญแแแจแฑโช๏ธ ๐๐๐๐
โ แ แแ online แแแฝแ แฅแป แฅแซแแ แแแต แแตแตแญ แแแแแญ แแโ๏ธ 1๏ธโฃ แแแฃ 100 แฅแญ แซแญแต 2๏ธโฃ แแแฃ 50 แฅแญ แซแญแต 3๏ธโฃ แแแฃ 25 แฅแญ แซแญแต โก๏ธ แแแ แจแแแฝแ แแแญ แจแแแแ แญแซแแข๐
โ๐คซ แ แแฎแ แจแฐแ แแฝแ แจแแตแขแญ แแฝแแ! แแแต แฅแฉแต แจแขแตแฎแตแซ แแตแถแต แจแแ แจแแฃ แตแ แแแฅแญแต แแตแแต แจแแแแจแ แณแแ ยซแแฝแแ แแแญยป แแ แแฒแคแ (PDF) แฅแแ แ แแข ๐๐๐ @Book_mereja ๐ @Book_mereja ๐
๐โโแตแ แแญแแแด แแแ แแดแณแฌ แแ แจแแ แจแแแแแ แฆแญแถแถแญแต แแแแแแ แจแแแฃ แปแแแข แฅแซแ แญแ แจแแ แแแแแ แญแณแฐแแ แปแแแ แแแแแแ แจแตแญ แญแแต แจแแแแ แแซแ แ แ แแแข แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต แญแแต
Photo, posted without a caption
แญแแแ แจแแ แแแแซแ แดแแตแฎแต แฎแดแแ แแแแฎแฝแ แจแแฐแแแแ แต แดแแแซแ แปแแ แแแแแ แ แแฃแฝแ!!! ๐๐๐ https://t.me/+2ua4-eAbNTI1MTRk https://t.me/+2ua4-eAbNTI1MTRk
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @yemariam_lijoche. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @yemariam_lijoche as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 15 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 31 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@yemariam_lijoche named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 13 August 2026 โ 16 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
named in 12 posts, 13 August 2026 โ 1 September 2026
named in 4 posts, 13 August 2026 โ 25 August 2026
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mezmur_zetewaedo ยท 19,395
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here โ alongside 65 others โ read 4 October 2026
@madottube ยท 20,336
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here โ alongside 62 others โ read 29 September 2026
@Ethiopian_Ortodoks ยท 122,245
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here โ alongside 59 others โ read 16 August 2026
@Sewsinor ยท 19,993
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here โ alongside 53 others โ read 1 October 2026
@BeteTewahdoEthio ยท 36,456
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here โ alongside 66 others โ read 1 September 2026
@yetwahdotemrtmaskemch ยท 42,402
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here โ alongside 66 others โ read 30 August 2026
@orthodox_tewahedo19 ยท 35,859
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 61 here โ alongside 60 others โ read 4 September 2026
@Love_fikirr ยท 34,403
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here โ alongside 59 others โ read 3 September 2026
@Egizhaberanidinew ยท 22,305
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 22 September 2026
@kaleheewentenew ยท 39,864
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here โ alongside 65 others โ read 31 August 2026
@ortto ยท 27,719
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 66 here โ alongside 65 others โ read 14 September 2026
@Mehereni_dngl ยท 47,742
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here โ alongside 76 others โ read 27 August 2026
@zemari_tewodrose_yosef ยท 28,315
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 64 here โ alongside 63 others โ read 9 September 2026
@Zmare_Dawit ยท 22,612
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 67 here โ alongside 66 others โ read 21 September 2026
@mahtebezetewahdo ยท 38,437
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 63 here โ alongside 62 others โ read 30 August 2026
@zemaritnsae ยท 20,999
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 65 here โ alongside 64 others โ read 26 September 2026
@Z_AbelMakbeb ยท 24,844
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here โ alongside 64 others โ read 17 September 2026
@Mikre_Haymanot ยท 32,628
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 4 September 2026
@ortodoxtewahedo ยท 59,671
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here โ alongside 76 others โ read 22 August 2026
@Amedehayemanote ยท 32,577
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 67 here โ alongside 66 others โ read 4 September 2026
@yemezmurdebiter ยท 26,903
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 66 here โ alongside 65 others โ read 12 September 2026
@maedot_ze_orthodox ยท 143,702
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 12 August 2026
@yemezmur_gexem ยท 154,141
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 12 August 2026
@yekidusantarikachewhiywetachew ยท 25,781
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ตแคแแฎแญ แแฎแแฝแ๐ตโ (@yemariam_lijoche), 18,446 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yemariam_lijoche.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.