🪙 #Bitcoin Whales holding 1,000–10,000 $BTC now control over 4.25 million $BTC, or 21.3% of the supply, after adding approximately 27,652 $BTC during recent accumulation. #Crypto
❤1

Channel
@yeezygem
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
58,780subscribers
-1,304 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002216835590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yeezygem |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yeezygem |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 58,780 | -156 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 58,936 | -211 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 59,147 | -169 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 59,316 | -76 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 59,392 | -155 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 59,547 | -81 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 59,628 | -132 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 59,760 | -202 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 59,962 | -82 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 60,044 | -40 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 60,084 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 60,084 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
127 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 45.7% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 14.2% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 11.8% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 6.30% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 3.94% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 3.15% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.36% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 2.36% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.36% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.57% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 1.57% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.57% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.787% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.787% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.787% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.787% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yeezygem. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2026 to 21 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🪙 #Bitcoin Whales holding 1,000–10,000 $BTC now control over 4.25 million $BTC, or 21.3% of the supply, after adding approximately 27,652 $BTC during recent accumulation. #Crypto
❤1
🪙 Jack Dorsey announced that over 800,000 merchants are already accepting payments in #BTC — new businesses are connecting #Bitcoin payments approximately every 8 seconds - with no processing fees, pay by touch, and instant settlement. #Crypto #DeFi
❤1
🤑 $TON has almost reached over 2.50 For the first time in months, #TonCoin has returned to these price regions, making over +80% in a week. And it looks like the market finally got a concrete trigger. Pavel #Durov announced that #Telegram will replace the TON Foundation as the main driving force of The Open Network, become the largest validator and reduce fees to almost zero. It was right after this information tha…
#GM! #Bitcoin and #Ethereum are liquidating shorts. In 24 hours, they shaved off $303 million. At one point, #BTC rose above $80k after bankers and crypto exchanges agreed on a key issue regarding stablecoins under the CLARITY Act. #Trump added a drop of positivity to the markets by promising US Navy escort for ships through the Strait of Hormuz. The catch is that he promised this two months ago too, and not a singl…
❤1
💳 Crypto card spending has already reached $600,000,000 per month — with about 90% of transactions going through #Visa, which is increasingly betting on #crypto infrastructure, not just traditional banks. #CryptoPay
🪙 The second-largest bullish sentiment regarding #XRP in the last 2 years is observed in social media. Such events do not always lead to immediate significant price spikes. Usually, this happens after the initial wave of euphoria, when FOMO subsides, leading to a bullish trend. #Crypto #Ripple
👀 Powell will remain on the #FOMC after his term as chair ends... 💬 Powell's continued membership on the FOMC will create problems for the future chair, who needs to push through an agenda of monetary policy easing.
❤1
🕯 #Ethereum vs #Nvidia 5 years later... 🤑 $10000 invested in #ETH 5 years ago is worth about $7700 today. 🇺🇸 $10000 in #NVDA would have turned into $146k. 🤔 How did this happen?
❤4🔥2😁1
▶️ Key points from the interview with CZ • In 5 years, #cryptocurrency will stop being called #crypto and will become the basic financial infrastructure. • #Blockchain and #AI technologies will merge, creating a new settlement system inaccessible to the banking environment. • Traditional #finance and cryptocurrencies will fully merge into a single system, and the term "cryptocurrency" will disappear. • The US is str…
❤6🔥2👍1
🪙 #Bitcoin on-chain activity has fallen to 2018 bear market levels, although the price has increased several times since then. Analysts believe this may indicate a shift in demand toward institutions #BTC is increasingly used through centralized services rather than directly on-chain. #Crypto #DeFi
❤3👍3👎1
📊 According to Token Terminal, tokenized assets are already held by about 1.2 million unique addresses. 57% of this market is occupied by tokenized funds (687,500 holders). For comparison: stablecoins have about 247 million unique addresses. #Crypto #RWA #WEB3
❤4👀1🗿1
🤔 A recent #DeFi hack may temporarily slow down Wall Street's ambitions. The attack on #KelpDAO (nearly $300M) hit not only #DeFi but also institutional sentiment. Following the event, the market saw a wave of fear - about $10B in capital reportedly flowed out of major protocols (#Aave). This could temporarily cool #TradFi's appetite for #blockchain and tokenization—because the deeper banks, funds, and fintechs go …
👍3❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yeezygem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,012,685 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Awesome Crypto - NFT, GIFTS” (@yeezygem), 58,780 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yeezygem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.