Channel
@yc772
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
455subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002391465059 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yc772 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yc772 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 455 | +9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 446 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 439 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 439 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (27 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,574 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐#北部客評 #客評 #52號 165.47.D.25Y 點擊查看妹妹詳細介紹 #妍碎碎唸 🦋 😂😂熟客哥哥叫妍妍直接安排～ 那妍妍當然還是安排哥哥最愛的大UU呀 約得開心 玩得滿意才是最重要ㄉ 謝謝哥哥這麼信任妍妍❤️ 完全放心交給妍就對啦 (｡•̀ᴗ-)✧ *⭐好素質經得起時間的檢驗 * 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🎀 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ ⭐ YC0909 🌐@YC09091 🔴全台班表 🔴客評專區 🔴獨家精選高檔區—0踩雷 🔴請點擊加Gleezy選妃專區 ♥️我負責貼你負責看，適合就密我 不適合就當逛街， 當你愛上了品質 就不再習慣廉價， 當你習慣了精緻 就再難接受將就， 不辜負客戶 不擴大宣傳。 沒有套路，只有真誠 只要您需要，妍隨時都在 ♡
Signed 🦋妍女士
🥰 #預約成功 我在截圖預約單的時候... 他說請筆名——摯愛的阿樹... =.= 自戀的男人
Signed 🦋妍女士
#預約成功 謝謝老吳直接甩單⭐⭐開心~ 🔔😊召喚各大VIP客戶熟客 快來 快來支援妍妍😏
Signed 🦋妍女士
⭐#中部客評 #客評 #欣迪 157.45.E.20歲 點擊查看妹妹詳細介紹 #妍碎碎唸 🦋 謝謝VIP哥哥的客評哈哈 感謝哥哥的支持和信任 誇了妹妹還誇了妍妍（偷偷開心 🤪🤪 嘿嘿 妹妹年輕可愛 價格也很香喲~ 喜歡骨感小隻馬別錯過這款~ *⭐好素質經得起時間的檢驗 * 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🎀 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ ⭐ YC0909 🌐@YC09091 🔴全台班表 🔴客評專區 🔴獨家精選高檔區—0踩雷 🔴請點擊加Gleezy選妃專區 ♥️我負責貼你負責看，適合就密我 不適合就當逛街， 當你愛上了品質 就不再習慣廉價， 當你習慣了精緻 就再難接受將就， 不辜負客戶 不擴大宣傳。 沒有套路，只有真誠 只要您需要，妍隨時都在 ♡
Signed 🦋妍女士
⭐#南部客評 #客評 #小檸 163.47.E.26歲 點擊查看妹妹詳細介紹 #妍碎碎唸 🦋 謝謝熟客哥哥的客評 哈哈哈 哥哥說喝茶很多次 遇到讓他很滿意主動要品鮑的妹妹 妍妍一直都相信 認真了解需求 才能安排到真正適合的妹妹~ 哥哥滿意 就是妍妍最開心的事 感謝❤️ *⭐好素質經得起時間的檢驗 * 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🎀 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ ⭐ YC0909 🌐@YC09091 🔴全台班表 🔴客評專區 🔴獨家精選高檔區—0踩雷 🔴請點擊加Gleezy選妃專區 ♥️我負責貼你負責看，適合就密我 不適合就當逛街， 當你愛上了品質 就不再習慣廉價， 當你習慣了精緻 就再難接受將就， 不辜負客戶 不擴大宣傳。 沒有套路，只有真誠 只要您需要，妍隨時都在 ♡
❤1
Signed 🦋妍女士
🙄小弟弟說快一年沒有捧場了 去旅遊回來之後就來捧場妍了🤣
Signed 🦋妍女士
Posted without readable text
Signed 🦋妍女士
•ɞ•歡迎光臨~ @yc09091 ᴅᴜwᴅᴜ…✨八月好運正在派送𓂂𓈒𓏸𓏸𓏸
Signed 🦋妍女士
⭐#南部客評 #客評 #𝟏𝟗號 163.45.D.24Y 點擊查看妹妹詳細介紹 #妍碎碎唸 🦋 嘿嘿 咋說呢 謝謝生客哥哥~ 直接過來就選好了19號沐沐 雖然中途有改時間也有改旅館 但是都準時到~感謝妹妹配合 也感謝的哥哥信任和支持❤️ 百位精選特價只有到月底ㄛ~ 要約特價妹妹的哥哥們不要錯過啦~😗 *⭐好素質經得起時間的檢驗 * 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🎀 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ ⭐ YC0909 🌐@YC09091 🔴全台班表 🔴客評專區 🔴獨家精選高檔區—0踩雷 🔴請點擊加Gleezy選妃專區 ♥️我負責貼你負責看，適合就密我 不適合就當逛街， 當你愛上了品質 就不再習慣廉價， 當你習慣了精緻 就再難接受將就， 不辜負客戶 不擴大宣傳。 沒有套路，只有真誠 只要您需要，妍隨時都在 ♡
Signed 妍女士🦋
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @yc772. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 91,554 of 1,599,580entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“客評+幹話文學+Gleezy :YC0909” (@yc772), 455 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yc772.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.