Channel
@YCXS21
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
339subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002605348921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YCXS21 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YCXS21 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 339 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 332 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 327 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 326 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 326 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 11 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (11 January 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 234 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 87.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢【關於妍川外送茶預約制+預約費公告】 各位VIP、熟客、生客哥哥們，感謝大家一直以來的支持！ 妍妍為了提供更高品質的約會體驗、也避免小姐被卡位的時間衝突，妍妍這邊的獨家優質正妹們，很早就全面實施【預約費預約制】 💰預約費規則： 1️⃣每一單一節預約費為 $200。 ✅現場滿意成交 ➔ 收取單節金額+$200 預約費（按節數計算）。 ❌現場打槍不滿意 ➔ 免收 $200 預約費（部分地區收取車錢）。 例：5000一節+200預約費。10000兩節+400預約費 🌟 妍來解釋一下為什麼要實施預約制？（您的權益保障） 📝之前很多優質熱門的小姐，因為怕被臨時放鴿子，都不願意接預約單。現在我們使用全部預約機制，由妍妍為哥喬出專屬你的時段~ 📝保留妹妹時段，準時到達：更多優質的心儀熱門正妹，時間直接鎖死，不再怕被別人臨時卡位或是妹妹臨時有事無法約到，妹妹更會在預約時間之前到達，不耽誤你的時間。 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️…
🔥1
為什麼預約時需要提供 LINE 或手機號碼呢？ 常常有哥哥問妍妍： 「我們不是都在 LINE 上聯絡了嗎？為什麼還要手機號碼呀？」 妍妍完全懂哥哥想保護隱私的心情 但留手機號碼 真的不是為了騷擾哥哥 而是希望整個預約流程更安心 更順利 也是對彼此的一份信任 🌸 1. 熟客福利登記 不怕資料遺失 妍妍對自家的熟客哥哥真的很偏心 🤍 留下手機號碼 累積優惠 登記專屬熟客福利 萬一哪天 LINE/TG帳號異常 換帳號 或是不小心遺失聊天紀錄 只要報電話 妍妍還是認得哥哥 熟客福利也不會因此消失 🫶🏻 🌸 2. 避免臨時失聯 白跑一趟 電腦偶爾也會鬧脾氣 網路也可能突然有狀況 如果臨時需要確認時間 地點/房號 或有任何突發狀況 妍妍才能第一時間聯絡到哥哥 避免哥哥到了現場卻聯絡不上妍 白白等妹妹/浪費時間 🌸 3. 我們不要身分證 只需要最基本的信任 現在很多同行為了安全 要求拍臉照 手持證件 身分證 工作證 甚至各種個資 妍妍一直…
所有人都要看一下
⚠️ 外約注意事項（請務必看清楚）⚠️ 請認準妍川外送官方TG🌐 @yc09091 近期盜用、詐騙頻繁 請自行提高警覺 因為我也是發現很多和我接近的ID 特地出此告示⤵️ ⭐ 本店不收任何會員費／保證金／訂金 ⭐ 不需提前匯款、不用買點數、不需要轉U ⭐ 一律「見面滿意後」才付款 ‼️ 重要聲明 見到小姐「只收現金」且「只交給本人」 不接受轉帳、不接受代收、不會有第三方收款 ⚠️ 任何形式的「提前收費」 包含假冒客服、假帳號、假流程 一律視為詐騙，請直接封鎖 若未經確認私下交易導致損失 本店一律不負責任 妍妍這邊流程一向公開透明 不玩話術、不走模糊地帶 請哥哥們自行判斷 保護好自己 請認準妍川外送官方TG🌐 @yc09091 請認準妍川外送官方TG🌐 @yc09091 請認準妍川外送官方TG🌐 @yc09091
🥰很好笑的對話~順便解答一下大家的疑惑 提前預約⬇ 一般提前1-3天確定好時間 妍給出預約單就算預約成功~ 關於一節的時間⬇ #北部 #雙北 #桃園 實際支付金額 10000含以上 60分 實際支付金額 8000含以下 50分 #中部 #台中 實際支付金額 10000含以上 60分 實際支付金額 8000含以下 50分 #南部 #高雄 #台南 實際支付金額 10000含以上 60分 實際支付金額 8000含以上 50分 實際支付金額 7000含以下 40分 ⬆#新竹 #台南 和 #高雄 相同
💯找妍川外送茶的好處💯 #台灣外送茶 #妍川外送茶 寶貝，是不是覺得外送茶價格比較高？ 其實價格高絕對有它的道理 價格不是重點 重點是體驗與品質 我整理了5個外送茶ㄉ優點： 1⃣. 品質好、選擇超多 可以依照你的喜好挑選各種類型：清純學生妹、蘿莉系、小隻馬、會噴水的敏感體質、熟女、巨乳、輕熟女，甚至極品麻豆級網美，應有盡有，總有一款能讓你心動！ 2⃣. 每日更新班表（新鮮短期兼職） 怕你所在區域（台北、台中、高雄）的妹子擔心被你約過，或是已經兼職很久？妍妍親自面試把關，資源每天更新，還有隱藏版VIP私房菜名單，保證每一位都是新鮮不重複！ 3⃣. 服務彈性、私密性高 沒有店家規定、沒有SOP流程的壓力，採用預約制，你的時間安排更自由。想怎麼玩就怎麼玩，也可以依照你的需求客製化服務，不受任何規則限制。 4⃣. 乾淨安心、重視品質與服務體驗 很多妹妹都沒做長期的，甚至有剛開苞就出來兼職、剛下海的素人。只要報班妍妍這邊嚴格要…
❤1
💗 妍川外送茶 💗 ⭐️新手快速上手 #新手喝茶 #價位 #類型 第一次喝茶的哥哥，常常會糾結「我該挑哪種妹妹？」 妍妍幫你把不同類型的妹妹用心介紹清楚～ 讓你一眼就知道哪款適合自己🥰 💛 Gleezy：YC0909 🩵 妍のTG：@YC09091 ❤️ 選妃頻道：@ycyc268
💗 妍川外送茶 💗 ⭐️新手快速上手 （第一次的哥哥看這篇就夠了） 其實不用想太多 不用試錯太多次 也不用浪費時間 把需求/預算/雷點丟給妍 其他妍來處理就好❤️ 整個過程簡單 清楚 不彎繞 該注意的 妍會幫你先顧好 讓你第一次約也很安心❤️ 💛 Gleezy：YC0909 🩵 妍のTG：@YC09091 ❤️ 選妃頻道：@ycyc268
#關於外送茶妹妹的健康問題 #旗下所有兼職的小姐都是兼職斜槓方式 #價格高低對比的是品質安全隱私 有些話其實很多哥哥都想問 卻不知如何開口 妍妍呢 也不想用很官方的方式回答 就用最真實的方式給哥哥們解釋吧 🫶🏻 1️⃣關於體檢這件事 老實說 健康這件事 跟是不是外送 沒有直接關係 重點一直都在「來源」跟「管理」 妍妍這邊在配合的妹妹 只要報班 都是固定有在做檢查的 基本上是三天小檢查 五天大檢查 而且不只是檢查 基本的安全觀念、保護措施 我們對小姐和客戶都一定會提醒到位❗️ 你在意健康 妍妍一定比你更在意 因為妍不是在做一次性的生意 是長期在做的口碑 找一個有在管理、有在控的店家/茶莊 才是真的比較安全的做法 2️⃣關於妹妹為什麼是兼職 妍妍這邊的妹妹 都是兼職 都是斜槓 那兼職代表什麼？ 代表她們不是每天都在接也不是每天都有空更不是隨時等客人 可能今天有空報班幾小時 可能一週來個一兩次 甚至有的半年之後再找妍妍 再次返…
❤1
🫶妍妍公告｜關於Gleezy⭐ 最近TG機制整改真的超級嚴 妍妍的群組前幾天又被掃掉一個😮💨 從上次所有帳號＋群組被一次大清除之後 也看到蠻多 同行都陸續被掃… 好多熟客都推薦我改用 GLEEZY 這陣子用下來都沒什麼問題 介面簡單、通知也正常 介紹.推薦.預約都可以來這邊找我👇 妍的Gleezy ⭐ YC0909 或是直接點文字就可以轉跳 💥為了感謝願意跟著妍妍的哥哥們 只要在 GLEEZY 私訊預約 都有立減2000的優惠唷 怕斷聯的快加起來～✨ 妍妍在等你✨
《外約為什麼要客人先開房間？》 其實今天有一位哥哥問妍妍一個問題 我覺得很多新客可能也會好奇 所以整理一下說明給大家 有些人會問： 為什麼你們是客人先開好房間 再讓小姐進房？ 因為有些個工會要求 先見面再一起去開房。 看起來好像比較合理 但其實很多人沒有發現裡面的差別。 妍妍簡單說幾個原因。 1️⃣ 小姐和你之間不會留下任何資料 如果是一起到飯店櫃檯check in 很多飯店會要求 雙人房需要兩個人資料登記 但小姐通常不會留下任何資料 而如果是 客人先開好房 小姐只需要用 訪客身份進房 櫃檯也不會留下小姐曾經與你同住的紀錄 這對客人和小姐來說 都是一種隱私保護 2️⃣ 先開房其實是一種誠意 對小姐來說 這代表你是真的要約 因為大家都知道 沒有人會先開好房間只是為了聊天 所以當小姐知道房間已經開好 她也會全力準備自己 打扮好 準時到 努力去把這一單做好 成交她才有收入 3️⃣ 雙方都不做「無成本交易」 不管是客人還是小…
❤3
【🔈妍妍小提醒｜外約常見詐騙方式】 最近其實看到不少哥哥和妍妍說被騙 有些甚至是第一次外約的新手 因此不敢再信任外約 妍妍想說還是整理一下常見套路給大家看看 有看到這兩句話的 基本上99%都是詐騙 哥哥們看一下 可以在喝茶上少走很多彎路 1️⃣「先匯訂金／先買點數再安排」 常見幾種： ・先匯訂金才幫你排 ・先買點數才能安排 ・先付車馬費妹妹才出發過去 ・要先驗資/先開通會員才算真客 ・先匯1000／2000證明你是真客,消費時抵扣 真相其實很簡單： 只要你一轉帳/匯款 對方不是直接消失 就是開始跟你說還要再補什麼費用 今天說訂金 等等又變安全費 接著又說房間費 最後錢越轉越多 人卻永遠見不到 妍妍的小鐵律： 👉 正常外約都是 見面滿意現金消費 👉 不需要買點數/轉帳/匯款 👉 也不需要先開會員VIP再介紹 任何要求你 先匯款、先買點數、先開會員 的 基本上就可以直接黑單封鎖了 請自行分辨 2️⃣當你猶豫後出現「今天最…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @YCXS21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,465,347 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“˚ʚ♡ɞ˚新手課堂開課了加我Gleezy :YC0909” (@YCXS21), 339 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YCXS21.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.