Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for یواشکی دوست دارم

Channel

یواشکی دوست دارم

@yavaashaki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,249subscribers

-186 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000502006
TypeChannel
Username@yavaashaki
Descriptionمن ﻫﻨوز ﮔﺎﻫﯽ ﯾﻮﺍﺷﮑﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﺏ ﺗﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﯽ ﺑﯿﻨﻢ ﯾﻮﺍﺷﮑﯽ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺖ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﻢ ﺻﺪﺍﯾﺖ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﻢ ﺑﯿﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻦﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﻮﺭﺍ ﯾﻮﺍﺷﮑﯽ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yavaashaki

Growth

52,24952,43552,3425 August 2026 — 52,435 subscribers6 August 2026 — 52,435 subscribers6 August 2026 — 52,430 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,417 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,368 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,340 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,310 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,299 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,284 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,271 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52,249 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -186. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,221–52,463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:2752,249-22
13 Aug 2026, 17:5452,271-13
12 Aug 2026, 17:3752,284-15
11 Aug 2026, 14:5552,299-11
10 Aug 2026, 12:0452,310-30
9 Aug 2026, 08:3152,340-28
8 Aug 2026, 11:4552,368-49
7 Aug 2026, 12:0652,417-13
6 Aug 2026, 09:1052,430-5
6 Aug 2026, 01:4652,435no change
5 Aug 2026, 19:5052,435first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 31 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.37%
avg views ÷ 52,249 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,900
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held33 (31 December 20249 August 2026)
Views total63,660
Reactions total1,361
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
42,700
Videos
2,030
Links
328

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,957 reactions across 33 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,89048.5%
1,23920.8%
💔78613.2%
👏3315.56%
😭2674.48%
😢1452.43%
👌761.28%
🤣470.789%
🙏340.571%
😁270.453%
👎260.436%
🥰230.386%
💯140.235%
🥴120.201%
🔥90.151%
🕊70.118%
😐50.084%
😇40.067%
🤮40.067%
🥱40.067%
4 further kinds70.118%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,957reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2024 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈4,320 views107 reactionsread 16 August 2026

‏+ چه نسبتی باهات داره ؟ - یه موجود اضافی توی اکثر خاطراتم ! @yavaashaki

👍58💔269😭7👎3👏3💯1

9 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈4,290 views111 reactionsread 16 August 2026

اگه يه دخترو خوشبخت كنى، اون خوشبخت ترت ميكنه اينو فقط مرداى واقعى ميفهمن… @yavaashaki

👍7426💯7🔥3😁1

9 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈4,380 views130 reactionsread 16 August 2026

نوشته بود: هرچقدر بیشتر بخشیدمش، از اون به بعد همونقدر کمتر دوسش داشتم من این جمله رو زندگی کردم. @yavaashaki

👍7230💔23😭4👎1

8 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈5,100 views110 reactionsread 16 August 2026

بدترین نوع چاپلوسی، تایید حرفیه که می‌دونید حقیقت نداره... @yavaashaki

👍8420💯6

8 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈4,830 views101 reactionsread 16 August 2026

واسه کسی که نیاز داره بغلش کنی سخنرانی نکن... 🫂❤️‍🩹 @yavaashaki

56👍40💔5

8 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈4,780 views49 reactionsread 16 August 2026

و آیا چیزی از ما باقی مانده که مرگ با خود ببرد؟ -چارلز بوکوفسکی @yavaashaki

💔29😢155

8 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈4,670 views59 reactionsread 16 August 2026

آباد تر از آن بود، که یاد من ویرانه بیفتد ... @yavaashaki

💔4110😢8

8 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈4,610 views89 reactionsread 16 August 2026

بزرگترین اشتباه هر مردی در رابطه اینه که فراموش میکنه مردان دیگری هم وجود دارن... همین… @yavaashaki

👍7613

8 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC≈4,280 views107 reactionsread 16 August 2026

یه وقتایی یه غم انقدر طولانی میشه دیگه روت نمیشه به کسی بگی هنوز بابتِ اون غمگینی... @yavaashaki

💔64👏1413👍8😢8

7 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈5,410 views122 reactionsread 16 August 2026

حتی حوصله قطع ارتباط ندارم 😏 گذاشتم خودش قطع شه انشالله🫠 @yavaashaki

👌45👍26😁2310🥴7💔5😇4🕊2

7 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈5,770 views144 reactionsread 16 August 2026

یادمون باشه: آدمِ عاشق، پیگیره... آدم برای کسی که دوسش داره توضیح میده… کسی که دوستت داره یکبار بهت میگه ده بار بهت ثابت میکنه… @yavaashaki

👍7643👏9💔9👎5🕊2

7 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈5,620 views130 reactionsread 16 August 2026

انگار وقتی کسی دوستت داره، با انگیزه‌تری … @yavaashaki

73👍34💔18🕊3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @yavaashaki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,172,808 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🎸ترانه های قدیمی🎸
@tanehayeghadimi · 217,701
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“یواشکی دوست دارم” (@yavaashaki), 52,249 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yavaashaki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.