2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 232–234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:38
233
no change
12 Aug 2026, 01:30
233
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.4%
avg views ÷ 233 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held
20 (13 March 2026 – 25 July 2026)
Views total
193
Reactions total
15
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 08s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
73
45.1%
😁
39
24.1%
🔥
37
22.8%
👀
3
1.85%
🙈
3
1.85%
⚡
2
1.23%
🐳
2
1.23%
✍
1
0.617%
👍
1
0.617%
💯
1
0.617%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yav01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 March 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Короче я решил, что культурный обмен должен работать в обе стороны и сделал канал про культуру России. Начну с перевода песен русского рока.
Первую песню, которую я перевел: "Сказочная тайга" Агата Кристи.
https://t.me/culturadarussia/8
А какие песни по вашему мнению нужно перевести?
Кстати перешлите ссылку на канал вашим бразильским друзьям.
А я создал ещё один канал — Мифы и легенды Бразилии.
Решил, что пусть здесь будет только про себя, а там уж буду писать про культуру Бразилии.
Сейчас я читаю и перевожу книгу об афробразильской религии, про духов (ориши). Это очень интересно и главное мало, что есть почитать об этом в рунете.
Первый переведенный мною миф уже в канале.
Война и мир
Текст написан под впечатлением от сериала Эйфория, войне США с Ираном и массового увольнения сотрудников в компании Oracle (до 30 000 человек одним днем) по всей видимости из-за ИИ.
Эйфория заканчивается…
Мне нравится новый сезон сериала Эйфория. Многие его критикуют за бессвязность, а мне кажется этот сериал как никто другой в действительности отражает сегодняшнюю реальность.
Напомню чем занимаются г…
Сегодня побывали в Palacio Gustavo Capanema.
Вновь памятник бразильского модернизма и пространство с невероятно живой выставкой.
Честно говоря не было сил снимать рилс, но как-то телефон сам включился и начал снимать и очень не зря я думаю.
Пространство огромное, а сама выставка небольшая, но очень согревающая.
Всем рекомендую, кто в ближайшее время окажется в центре Рио.
Всегда любил городские прогулки, но исследовать Рио — это особый кайф.
В этот раз жена показала своё любимое место — рядом с популярным Парком-руин скромно расположился музей "Небесная усадьба".
Великолепная панорама на залив Гуанабара. Внутри — коллекция промышленника и филантропа Кастро Майя. Но главная жемчужина этого места — восхитительный сад, который запускает удивительное медитативное состояние.
Выходишь из…
Думаете, маленькие дети смогут понять современное искусство? 🎨👧
Они его творят! ✨
Наша учительница из кружка по рисованию организовала экскурсию в Дом Роберто Мариньо. Мы пошли на выставку бразильской художницы Беатриз Мильазес — и это оказался восторг! 😍
Беатриз, впитавшая в себя энергию карнавала и яркие краски местных тропических растений 🌺🌴, создала в своих работах неповторимый стиль — «тропическую абстракцию»…
Что было у меня украдено в Рио-де-Жанейро за 3 года:
- Амелия забыла детский рюкзачок с игрушками на остановке, вернулись через 10 минут их уже не было.
- Стоя в толпе с детьми на блоко, у меня из кармана вытащили телефон.
- Адель вчера на лавочке в парке оставила рюкзачок с новыми шлепками и отошла (но при этом она не выходила с площадки), вернулась через 5 минут и его уже не было.
В целом жить с этим можно тем бо…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yav01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Curly mum @curly_mum · 212,317 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Явь” (@yav01), 233 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yav01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.