2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 08:30
55
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:20
55
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
4
Videos
2
Links
17
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
138 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5377320714112087415
31
22.5%
custom 5384182740411240426
19
13.8%
custom 5474177367712735995
19
13.8%
❤
18
13.0%
custom 5418063924933173277
10
7.25%
custom 5408880430155836385
8
5.80%
custom 5386766919154016047
7
5.07%
custom 5235624876819098821
6
4.35%
custom 5384563678240580805
6
4.35%
💔
6
4.35%
custom 5370574634750056701
5
3.62%
🐳
3
2.17%
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2024 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 17 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yaosoznal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 November 2024 to 3 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Эйай прочитал мой год по музыке. И попал слишком точно.
Стриминговые сервисы — странный дневник. Мы туда не пишем, но они всё равно фиксирует то, что происходило внутри: спад, подъем, кто мы были в марте, что чувствовали в июле, куда пришли к декабрю.
Я закинул свои топы из Spotify и Яндекс.Музыки в эйай — просто ради интереса.
Но то, что он выдал, оказалось настолько точным, будто я сам это писал в какой-то другой…
Наверное, раз двадцать пересмотрел сегодня этот кусочек. Часто включаю подкасты с Либерманами, просто чтобы почувствовать, как им вместе тепло. Кажется, так выглядит счастье — когда два сознания делают один вдох
Иногда между людьми возникает нечто вроде распределённого разума.
Когда не нужно объяснять — просто знаешь. Когда пауза одного уже содержит ответ другого. Когда разговор превращается в поток, а поток — в систему с общей памятью и целью. Это редкое состояние, где границы между «я» и «мы» стираются не ради зависимости, а ради точности.
Shared mind. Human version.
Я часто чувствую благодарность к тем временам, когда …
Мы разошлись.
Прошло больше 6 лет, и всё это время я не давал себе горевать — просто выключил процесс и пошёл дальше. Но, кажется, некоторые процессы нельзя просто остановить. Они продолжают работать где-то в фоне, даже если ты не смотришь в их сторону.
🌙 Сказка на ночь про тревожного человека
Жил-был человек, у которого по вечерам мысли начинали кружиться, как листья в осеннем ветре.
Он ложился в тёплую постель, закрывал глаза — а мысли шептали ему в темноте:
«А вдруг не справлюсь?»
«А если всё пойдёт не так?»
«А может, надо прямо сейчас что-то решать?»
Он пробовал их унять — глубоко дышал, отвлекался, прогонял. Но мысли становились только громче, и внутри начина…
📱 Почему технологии так усложняют наше общение и отношения?27%
🧠 Как понять, что вами манипулируют в интернете?23%
🔒 Как не разбрасываться личными данными в сети?55%
🤖 Можно ли доверять нейросетям свои чувства?18%
🎓 Как нейросети изменят образование и карьеру?23%
The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Так обидно, когда разговор доходит до самого интересного и вдруг — пауза. С @yaosoznal это уже случалось несколько раз, и хочется скорее вернуться к незавершённым темам. Вот 5 направлений, которые стоит раскрыть по-настоящему:
📱 Почему технологии так усложняют наше общение и отношения?
Кажется, мы уже обсуждали с @yaosoznal, как приложения для знакомств и соцсети порой мешают людям сближаться и доверять друг другу.…
Иногда даже неловко получается, когда Венди себя хорошо ведёт.
Разговаривал на прогулке с другой собачницей, упомянул, что собака моя — непростая. Удивилась — как, почему?
А Венди в этот момент прыгает вокруг меня, волоча за собой поводок, который я намеренно выпустил из рук, не убегает далеко и тотально слушается.
Кажется, я в этот момент выглядел супер неадекватом, который предъявляет собаке странные претензии 😅…
Я выхожу на улицу и ловлю себя на мысли: почему никто вокруг не говорит про эйай? Новые модели, сервисы, агенты… Их становится всё больше 🤪
Но сегодня — не о них.
В декабре брали собачку на передержку. Было то ещё приключение — особенно с нашей Венди и котиками :)
Тогда я гулял с ними по три часа в день. Соцсети, телеграм-каналы, весь бесконечный поток информации просто исчез. Всё "не суперважное" ушло в архив. Ос…
custom 537732071411208741518
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yaosoznal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📱 Почему технологии так усложняют наше общение и отношения?27%
🧠 Как понять, что вами манипулируют в интернете?23%
🔒 Как не разбрасываться личными данными в сети?55%
🤖 Можно ли доверять нейросетям свои чувства?18%
🎓 Как нейросети изменят образование и карьеру?23%
The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2024 to 3 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@yaosoznal” (@yaosoznal), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yaosoznal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
