Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кирилл Янков

Channel

Кирилл Янков

@yankov2023

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

491subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001729852720
TypeChannel
Username@yankov2023
Created9 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yankov2023

Growth

490491490.56 August 2026 — 490 subscribers6 August 2026 — 490 subscribers13 August 2026 — 491 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 490–491 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:35491+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:47490no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:22490first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.2%
avg views ÷ 491 subscribers
Avg views / post
178
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held16 (10 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,485
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5254.7%
2526.3%
🤔88.42%
👎55.26%
💯22.11%
😡22.11%
🔥11.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC86 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#городскойтранспорт #москва О 800 МЕТРАХ НОВОЙ ВЫДЕЛЕННОЙ ПОЛОСЫ на Проспекте Мира : эффект от нее будет незначительным. Комментировал изданию msk1.ru

1

4 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC103 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В заключение обсудили образовательные кредиты под 3% годовых. Считаю, что раз уж государство снова занялась распределением выпускников (пока только медицинских вузов, но лиха беда начало), нужно, чтобы работа выпускника по распределению постепенно погашала образовательный кредит https://tv.rbc.ru/archive/news/6a71a83668ba50013b9db6bb

👍2

4 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC101 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Во второй части говорили о том, почему юридических лиц сейчас больше ликвидируется, чем создается. Я предполагаю, что это эффект чистки реестра от давно не подающих признаков жизни предприятий, а также от снижения востребованности «фирм-однодневок» вследствие более эффективной борьбы с ними https://tv.rbc.ru/archive/den/6a719c9c2ae59683f128f2f1

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC96 viewsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня в первой части эфира с участием Михаила Виноградова обсуждали текущие войны, обратил внимание на паралич судоходства в Черном море https://tv.rbc.ru/archive/den/6a7197c02ae59683f128f2f0

3 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC131 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#авиация КОНЕЦ АВИАКОМПАНИИ «ИЖАВИА» - незаметный, но важный этап перестройки бизнеса авиаперевозок. «Ижавиа» была последним крупным перевозчиком, аффилированным с аэропортом базирования. Такая модель, сложившаяся в 1990-е благодаря приватизации авиаотрядов целиком, позволяла, не пуская в свой аэропорт конкурентов, поддерживать монопольно высокие цены на авиабилеты. Например, в конце 1990-х билеты из Москвы в Новосиб

👍82

3 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC128 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Завтра с 10.05 до 11.35 буду в студии телеканала РБК, в прямом эфире программа «День.Главное»

👍31🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC131 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#такси ЖИВОТНЫЕ В ТАКСИ – МЕНЯЕТСЯ ЛИ ЧТО-ТО ? В СМИ идет информация о том, что с 1 сентября будут изменения в правилах провоза багажа и животных в легковом такси. Действительно, с этой даты вступают в силу новые Правила, утверждённые приказом Минтранса. Новостью это было весной, когда приказ был подписан. Про животных в такси написано: «Допускается провоз в легковом такси собак в намордниках при наличии поводков и п

2👍2💯2

29 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC197 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#метро #москва ЗА ПРОЕЗД В МЕТРО НАДО ПЛАТИТЬ, но к информации о борьбе с безбилетниками, размещенной в канале Дептранса, есть вопросы: а) учитывая, что в метро не пройти мимо турникета, хорошо бы пояснить, как туда попадают безбилетники ? Перепрыгивая турникет? Прижимаясь к впереди идущему пассажиру? По чужой социальной карте? Или есть другие способы? б) читаем, что на каждой станции дежурят минимум по два сотрудник

5👍1🤔1

28 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC159 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#метро #петербург СТАНЦИЮ МЕТРО «БРОНЕВАЯ» СТРОЯТ, ДА НЕ ТУДА Продолжается реализация крупной градостроительной ошибки Петербурга – строительство «Броневой» с выходом, направленным в противоположную сторону от одноимённой платформы

4🤔1

23 Jul 2026, 02:40 UTC254 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#москва #метро ВОЗМОЖНОЕ ЗАКРЫТИЕ ЧАСТИ КОЛЬЦЕВОЙ ЛИНИИ НА НЕСКОЛЬКО МЕСЯЦЕВ - очень скверное решение. Почему полвека назад смогли встроить станцию «Горьковская»(ныне «Тверская») без закрытия движения и обходных тоннелей, а сейчас эти технологии утеряны? Комментировал изданию msk1.ru https://msk1.ru/text/transport/2026/07/22/76545978/

👍43

22 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC237 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#железная дорога ПОЧЕМУ Я НЕ ПРОТИВ РОСТА КОМИССИОННОГО СБОРА ЗА ВОЗВРАТ БИЛЕТОВ Как известно, сбор за возврат был резко снижен в период пандемии, а сейчас предложено его повысить до размера, не превышающего 10% от цены билета. Это не борьба с перекупщиками – с ними эффективно справились изменением алгоритмов системы «Экспресс». Сейчас, когда в СМИ говорят о «перекупщиках» - фактически говорят о владельцах ботов, и

👍9👎5

21 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC365 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#москва #московскаяобласть #метро СЕРГЕЙ СОБЯНИН ОБЪЯВИЛ О ПРОДЛЕНИИ АРБАТСКО-ПОКРОВСКОЙ ЛИНИИ МЕТРО В ПОСЕЛОК ВОСТОЧНЫЙ, за МКАД. Напомню, что все Генпланы предусматривали продление туда Сокольнической линии прямо под Щёлковским шоссе. Арбатско-Покровская, через строящееся «Гольяново», придёт туда, мягко говоря, весьма извилисто. Но, наверное, лучше так, чем никак. Новая станция (если на неё хватит денег в отощавшем

👍5😡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @yankov2023. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTCAnonymous Poll89 voters

ЕСЛИ В ГОРОД (ДО КОТОРОГО ПРИМЕРНО ОТ 300 ДО 700 КМ) ЕСТЬ И ДНЕВНЫЕ, И НОЧНЫЕ ПОЕЗДА - КАКОЙ ВЫ ВЫБЕРЕТЕ ?

  1. Только дневной, ночными не езжу7%
  2. Только ночной, не езжу дневными6%
  3. Выберу, ориентируясь в первую очередь на цену билетов8%
  4. Выберу, ориентируясь в первую очередь на удобное время отправления/прибытия30%
  5. Выберу по совокупности факторов46%
  6. Поездом не поеду, даже если мне приплатят3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 179,379 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кирилл Янков” (@yankov2023), 491 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yankov2023.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.