Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Yankee go home

@yankacuba

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

387subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001379169984
TypeChannel
Username@yankacuba
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yankacuba

Growth

384387385.56 Aug 2026, 01:51 — 384 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:17 — 384 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:31 — 387 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 01:517 Aug 2026, 01:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 384–387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:31387+3
6 Aug 2026, 20:17384no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:51384first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1078.2%
avg views ÷ 387 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,170
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.609%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total20,863
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

400 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁28070.0%
4110.3%
😢358.75%
🤔225.50%
🗿102.50%
🔥82.00%
🐳10.25%
👍10.25%
👏10.25%
😱10.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈18,000 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кто понял, тот понял.

😁28🗿5

4 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC675 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Трамп по уровню неодобрения вышел на четвёртое место в истории США. С учётом того, что у него еще два года впереди, возможно, это не предел.

😁15

2 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC657 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мы встроили лотерею в казино, чтобы ты мог лудоманить, пока лудоманишь!

😁21

27 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC799 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Жажда скорости живет внутри каждого грузина, даже если это кот.

19😁11🔥3

18 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC732 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Что иронично, Apple - это единственная из бигтех-компаний, которая не инвестировала в разработку собственной открытой для сторонних пользователей LLM. Кажется, в очередной раз осуществляется сценарий "улиточка - работник месяца".

😁213👏1

14 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC774 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В Китае за прошлый год закрылось 30 тысяч детских садиков и начальных школ. Вымираем с ускорением.

😢124😁2🤔1

14 Jul 2026, 06:46 UTC624 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Этот маленький зелёный столбик в правом нижнем углу выглядит таким тонким-претонким лучиком надежды. (на самом деле, не знаю, почему мне так интересно смотреть за падением Мосбиржи, я не русский, и денег у меня там нет)

😁21🗿2

9 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC670 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Похоже, производители "харда" сожрали весь свободный кэш у создателей софта и просят добавки.

😁9😢4🤔3

9 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,530 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Как мы докатились до такого?

😢10😁51🤔1

9 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC510 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Примерно про эту аномалию на западном фондовом рынке я говорю.

😁11🔥4

8 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC499 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Несколько месяцев не мог вернуться к теме массовых увольнений в ИТ. Только начинаю сочинять пост для Хроник умеренного оптимизма - выходят новости, которые заставляют переосмыслить ситуацию. Решаю переименовать рубрику в "Хроники уверенного пессимизма" - при ближайшем рассмотрении все оказывается не так плохо. В результате я, наконец, решился, поэтому встречайте, в эфире Хроники не такого уж и уверенного оптимизма.

🤔73😁1

8 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC409 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Либо рынок что-то знает, либо сейчас очень удачный момент, чтобы закупаться российскими активами. https://t.me/Finindie/2853

😢6😁2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yankacuba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 88,109 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Yankee go home” (@yankacuba), 387 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yankacuba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.