Channel
@yanaduprel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
255subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001984077020 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yanaduprel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yanaduprel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 255 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 255 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (30 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,837 |
| Reactions total | 203 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
296 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 54 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5332492937852890015 | 49 | 16.6% | |
| custom 5228962497779740222 | 48 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5230975226828825393 | 45 | 15.2% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5231157543895574567 | 25 | 8.45% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 4.39% | |
| custom 5332565402541107747 | 11 | 3.72% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 2.03% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.01% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.338% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🌟 настало время долгожданного анонса ребятки.... никто не ожидал но все знали 16 августа, вы увидите меня в Сенку Ишигами на Аджисае, как выступающего и простого научного работягу!!! до встречи и успешной вам подготовки к фестивалю!!
💘16custom 533249293785289001512custom 522896249777974022210custom 52309752268288253935
до встречи на аджисае!!!🌹
💘14custom 52289624977797402221custom 52309752268288253931
микроволнуюсь
custom 533249293785289001510custom 52311575438955745674custom 53325654025411077474💘1
👽🧦™️🦄🛼🥑🐈™️🪀🍷 Представь, что мы делаем с тобой парный косплей. Кого будем делать и почему? 👁 Или кем ты меня видишь в пару к уже своему сделанному образу? 😇
❤🔥5custom 52289624977797402221custom 53324929378528900151
а вот увидите все сами😁
🎉4👌3custom 52289624977797402222
есть у меня связь какая-то с аджиком, он во всех планах первый хд первый фест, первое групповое призовое, есть небольшие надежды на первое призовое в соло нооо я предпочитаю чисто кайфовать🌹 не для работы создан я, а для счастья любви удовольствия и отдыха из друзей и знакомых много кстати кто едет!!
custom 52311575438955745679custom 52289624977797402224custom 52309752268288253934
makeup baby
custom 52289624977797402225custom 53324929378528900154custom 52309752268288253932
надеюсь, что пройду хд я бы не сказала, что я прям пиздец!!!!! ожидаю что-то от аджисая, просто буду рада выступить и провести там время со своими кентами✨
custom 53324929378528900156custom 52289624977797402223custom 52309752268288253932custom 52311575438955745671
у многих уже увидела, давайте тоже что-ли перед аджиком полялякаем http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=kYTIRw_wzyUVC4q
custom 52289624977797402224custom 52309752268288253933custom 52311575438955745671custom 53324929378528900151
все ребята с богом
❤🔥6💘2custom 53324929378528900152custom 52289624977797402221custom 52309752268288253931custom 52311575438955745671custom 53325654025411077471
боже поможи дослать мне фотки
custom 52311575438955745678custom 52289624977797402226custom 53325654025411077476
происходит лютый воркинг перед закрытием досыла материалов на аджисай
custom 52309752268288253938custom 52289624977797402224custom 53324929378528900154💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yanaduprel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 199,184 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“рест | красный бархат ака яна дюпрель” (@yanaduprel), 255 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yanaduprel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.