Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for not ur online girlfriend

Channel

not ur online girlfriend

@yairgayuvgenshin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

580subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001285104138
TypeChannel
Username@yairgayuvgenshin
Created6 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yairgayuvgenshin

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5805925861 September 2026 — 586 subscribers2 September 2026 — 592 subscribers10 September 2026 — 591 subscribers25 September 2026 — 580 subscribers1 September 202625 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 24 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 578–594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 11:21580-11
10 Sept 2026, 11:21591-1
2 Sept 2026, 03:12592+6
1 Sept 2026, 05:45586first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
352.5%
avg views ÷ 580 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.893%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held17 (13 August 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total8,177
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 05:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

303 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52761999826202260917424.4%
custom 54583951238365262206120.1%
custom 52831052678299972423812.5%
custom 53596512830808728393611.9%
custom 53596863042442043113110.2%
custom 5280534588169419348258.25%
custom 5283247263743770216216.93%
custom 5282812784852107537175.61%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 303 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC104 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

НУ ПУСТЬ ТОГДА САМ ВЫНАШИВАЕТ БЛЯТЬ!!!!

custom 52828127848521075379

31 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC154 views19 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

аня меня кормит репостами как своего ребенка который был очень амбициозным в детстве но соскуфился и прячется в тени, а она как заботливая мама подкитывает косарик на пиццу и пиво с долькой разочарования в своем чаде, но все же с любовью……

custom 545839512383652622019

31 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC159 views24 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

спасибо мне за меня

custom 535965128308087283915custom 52761999826202260915custom 52832472637437702164

30 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈7,760 views21 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

ладно давай лучше по старым правилам

custom 528053458816941934819custom 52831052678299972422

28 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC400 views11 reactionsread 1 September 2026

⚡️Человек, похожий на Диму Билана, был замечен с людьми, похожими на внуков

custom 545839512383652622011

28 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC386 views13 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @nytkablogPhoto

теперь суррогатное материнство предоставляет возможность получить сразу внуков? невероятно 👍

custom 528310526782999724213

24 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC547 views15 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

последний короткий тикток перед сном

custom 528310526782999724215

22 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC515 views21 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

индусы бегут оккупировать мой канал потому что в названии есть «онлайн девушка»:

custom 535965128308087283921

22 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC419 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

просто оставлю это здесь

custom 52828127848521075378

21 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC626 views27 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

даша будто бы одна из тех кто «блин у меня нет подруг, все бабы змеи, все телки суки, мне с мужиками комфортнее❤️»

custom 527619998262022609115custom 52831052678299972428custom 54583951238365262204

20 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC656 views30 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

а можно сука смотреть на ребенка без размышлений о том что о ней будут думать мужчины

custom 527619998262022609130

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @yairgayuvgenshin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“not ur online girlfriend” (@yairgayuvgenshin), 580 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yairgayuvgenshin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.