Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
📚 Я считаю! || Бухгалтерские услуги
@ya_scitayu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
241subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002164386860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ya_scitayu |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ya_scitayu |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 241 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 245 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 245 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.05%
- avg views ÷ 241 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 17.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 February 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 17 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
936 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 277 | 29.6% | |
| ❤ | 269 | 28.7% | |
| 👍 | 218 | 23.3% | |
| 😁 | 37 | 3.95% | |
| 🤝 | 32 | 3.42% | |
| 🙏 | 20 | 2.14% | |
| 🏆 | 18 | 1.92% | |
| 🥰 | 17 | 1.82% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 1.50% | |
| ☃ | 10 | 1.07% | |
| ✍ | 7 | 0.748% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.427% | |
| 😨 | 4 | 0.427% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 0.427% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.321% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.214% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 936reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ya_scitayu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 February 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Малый бизнес освободили от нового НДС до 2029 года. Совет Федерации одобрил закон, который сохраняет порог годовой выручки в 20 млн рублей для предпринимателей на упрощённой системе налогообложения. По оценкам властей, решение затронет около 360 тысяч компаний и 4 млн человек.
🔥8❤5
Кто такой бухгалтер? Это человек, который решает ваши проблемы, о которых вы даже не знали. Путями, которых вы не понимаете 😁
👍15🔥8😁6
Профи не работают за еду — у нас в команде спецы с 10+ лет опыта. Наши услуги для тех, кто строит долгосрочные планы. Мы не занимаемся расчлененкой учёта. Наш подход к работе: Полный учёт в комплексе - бухгалтерский, налоговый, кадровый учёт в одной системе! Автоматизация процессов — меньше ошибок, больше точности; Онлайн‑доступ к данным из любой точки мира; Потому что Мы думаем на шаг вперёд! Законодательство н…
🔥23👍19🤝14
Сегодняшняя мысль дня — мой личный девиз на сегодня 😀 С утра всё пошло не так, как задумывалось… Но, может, это Вселенная намекает: расслабься и получай удовольствие от неожиданных поворотов?🙂 Я не отменяю свои намерения — я просто меняю маршрут. И это тоже часть пути 😃
❤26👍16🔥14😁2
❗️❗️❗️Внимание! Экстренное сообщение! Я ухожу в МАХ, этот канал удаляю… Стоп, стоп, стоп! Это была репетиция драмы. С 1 апреля вас, дорогие мои! 🤪 Приключения Телеграма в России — круче любого сериала. Кто следующий? Что будет? Попкорн уже наготове! Вы тут? Всё работает, или тоже готовите план эвакуации?
😁5👏3
🦜Представьте: ваш корабль уверенно идёт по торговому маршруту, паруса наполнены ветром, трюмы полны добычи… И вдруг — аврал! Руль заклинило, паруса обвисли, корабль встал как вкопанный. Так бывает, когда банк или госорганы блокируют расчётный счёт. Разберёмся, почему это случается — и как снова поднять паруса! ⛵️ Почему корабль встал на якорь? Чаще всего шторм поднимают три силы: 1️⃣Береговой дозор (банк по 115‑Ф…
❤22👍22🔥8🤝4🙏4
Меня часто спрашивают: при какой доле вычетов НДС применение ставки 22% будет выгоднее, чем использование пониженных ставок 5% или 7%? 1.Сравнение со ставкой 5%: Доля вычетов> ((22%/(22%−5%))×100%≈77,27%. Вывод. Если доля вычетов НДС превышает 77,27%, применение ставки 22% с правом на вычет экономически выгоднее, чем ставки 5% без вычета. 2. Сравнение со ставкой 7%: Доля вычетов>((22%/(22%−7%))×100%≈68,18%. Вывод. Ес…
❤27🔥19👍13
ЕСХН: ветер в паруса вашего фермерского дела! 🌾Приветствую, отважные капитаны полей и фермеры‑мореплаватели! Знаете ли вы, что в бурном океане налогов есть тихий и выгодный залив — Единый сельскохозяйственный налог (ЕСХН)? Это не просто режим, а настоящий попутный ветер для тех, кто ведёт хозяйство на суше, и даже для рыбаков, бороздящих водные просторы! 🎣 Кто может взять курс на ЕСХН? На борт допускаются: капита…
🔥29👍22🏆10❤2
Приветствую вас, юнги и бывалые капитаны торговых судов! Закалённый ветрами корабельный хранитель корабельной казны, что бороздил налоговые воды тридцать лет, нынче поведает вам про АУСН - автоматизированную упрощённую систему налогообложения. Это не просто гавань, а настоящий оазис для тех, кто устал от рифов отчётности и ураганов деклараций! Раньше слово «налоги» означало ворох бумаг и головную боль, а теперь — …
👍7❤4💯2
Признаюсь честно: деньги, конечно, приятны, но настоящая радость — в другом. В том самом моменте, когда владелец бизнеса наконец то спит как младенец и не подскакивает от каждого звонка с незнакомого номера. (Шутка. Ну, почти.) Сейчас все только и делают, что трубят о своих победах, размахивают дипломами и кричат: «Посмотрите, какой я крутой!» А я считаю, что в этом нет особого смысла. Я до сих пор горжусь, что п…
🔥25❤18🥰13👍3
Приветствую, отважные мореплаватели бизнеса! Устали бороться с волнами НДС и рифами сложного бухучёта? Пора сменить галсы и направить свой фрегат в тихую бухту упрощённой системы налогообложения (УСН) с налоговой ставкой 6 %! ‼️Представьте: вместо океанских штормов — лёгкий бриз отчётности, вместо поисков сокровищ по сложным картам — прямой курс расчёта налога. Звучит как сказка старого боцмана? А это реальность для…
👍30🔥20❤16🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ya_scitayu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 995,200 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📚 Я считаю! || Бухгалтерские услуги” (@ya_scitayu), 241 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ya_scitayu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.