我比較喜歡大叔,不喜歡同齡真的很怪嗎
❤2

Channel
@y93988
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
502subscribers
+31 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002746185872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @y93988 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/y93988 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 502 | +22 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 480 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 470 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 471 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 471 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 December 2025 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 674 |
| Reactions total | 97 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
295 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 195 | 66.1% | |
| 🥰 | 68 | 23.1% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 7.80% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.02% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.678% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
我比較喜歡大叔,不喜歡同齡真的很怪嗎
❤2
一個人的晚上,好像特別容易覺得寂寞🥺 有人陪我聊聊天嗎? 不然…今晚你陪我一下好不好🤍
❤11
為什麽沒有人約我是我身材不夠好嗎
❤15
好想談戀愛喔 誰可以把我領走 今天穿這套
❤13
今晚又是一個人 又35歲大叔嗎
❤12
大叔說我有點營養不良 誰能告訴我這樣的身材該怎麼補?
❤12🥰1
穴穴都自己流水了 沒人幫忙滿足嗎 現在約我的有驚喜 #想愛愛 #需要密我
❤12
有活人嗎 活人真人點一個愛心❤️❤️
❤10
Channel name was changed to «可欣秘密花園»
男生到底都喜歡怎麼樣的女生? 不吵不鬧的? 還會撒嬌等你回家的?
❤9
Channel photo updated
我是喬伊。 以前的我,一直都是靠個人兼職在打拼,什麼都接、什麼都做,只為了讓生活過得去。那段時間真的很累,但也讓我更清楚,自己想給家人的是什麼樣的未來。 後來因為家庭的關係,我選擇讓自己穩定下來,慢慢「上岸」,希望可以給家人一份安心。 也是在那段轉變的過程中,我去銀行辦理貸款,認識了佩宣。聊著聊著才發現,她也是一位單親媽媽,一樣為了孩子努力撐著生活 也有在做個人兼職 那一刻我其實很有感觸——原來我們都在不同的地方努力著,為了同樣重要的人。 也因為這樣,我開始更願意把自己接觸到的機會分享出去。不是什麼誇張的承諾,而是希望,能讓正在努力的人,多一條路可以選擇。 如果你或你身邊的朋友,有想要按摩 或者舒壓的 可以幫幫這個正在努力的單親媽媽 佩宣 她的line:6723322 她的fb個人主頁: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61583781870445 麻煩大…
👍11❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @y93988. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,084,333 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“可欣秘密花園” (@y93988), 502 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/y93988.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.