‼️ 先卡套路 免费陷阱 有的客户说有的地方可以先卡! 我们的建议就是你去试试,我们这不可能白嫖。 好,那么这里就给大家讲解一下先卡的套路 首先 -1️⃣他们会发广告特别强调可以先给你卡密不要钱 -2️⃣你去问的时候,人家会告诉你,先给你卡密但是你需要有Usdt而且要给人家看一眼。这都没问题,比较合理 -3️⃣之后会要求你把币放在指定的钱包里(例如火币钱包、im钱包等)截图发给他们看。 -4️⃣这时候会要你的trx充值地址,他们会会给你转一些trx证明你这个钱包可用(其实这就是他们提现你usdt的手续费,没有trx是提不了币的) -5️⃣接下来会要求你转一个u过去,那么这一个u你转过去了(这个操作是为了截取你的助记词) -6️⃣现在已经万事俱备了,指定钱包存币、trx手续费、助记词全有了。直接就可以把你的币都转走了 天上不会掉馅饼,你一个几块钱的TG号就可以免费拿卡密是不可能的。踏踏实实做事,不要想着可以白嫖那种好事 给大…

Channel
偏门/话费卡/洗货/高利润 唯一真货
@xyxihuo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001581111430 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xyxihuo |
| Description | ☄️小白可教!简单易上手! ☄️卡券回收!轻松赚差价! 唯一客服:@kkkygh |
| Created | 21 June 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xyxihuo |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 18 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 18 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 21 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 3
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
348 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 114 | 32.8% | |
| 😱 | 62 | 17.8% | |
| 💩 | 57 | 16.4% | |
| 🤬 | 34 | 9.77% | |
| 🤮 | 32 | 9.20% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 7.47% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 5.17% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.15% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0.287% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 348reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2022 to 16 September 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
近期有很多朋友反馈欧意的u均是24小时甚至一个星期才可以用,给大伙推出新平台,购买后当天可以使用,需要可以自行下载 币久官方下载地址 ✅ S6交易所官网:https://www.s6.com 🔥 国内打不开官方的安卓用户,联系客服索要最新官方客户端 ✅ 币久官网:https://www.b9ccc.com ✅ 优易UEEX官网:https://www.ueex.com/zh_CN 遇到问题的 联系客服:@kkkygh
👎56💩29😱27🤬20🤮17😢8👍1
怎么兑换 ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔘闲鱼省心卖➖卖卡劵➖话费充值卡➖面值100➖填写卡号密码➖提交➖等待质检➖完成收款 🔘京东➖首页搜索拍拍回收➖进入之后搜索话费充值卡➖选择面值100 🔘微信➖微信公众号➖搜索人人销卡➖关注公众号➖点我要卖卡➖话费充值卡➖面值100➖填写卡号密码➖提交➖等待收款 客服:@kkkygh
👎58😱35💩25🤬11🤮10😢10😁4👍1
感谢新老客户代理的信任,货一直在出,因为发现近期有人偷取我的图片等出去招摇撞骗,所以很少发交易记录。有句话说的好,那些老板哪个起家的时候不是捞偏门,现在怎么样,个顶个的人上人人模狗样,所以说一句话英雄不出出处,人们只在乎结果。货一直在出,需要拿货的直接联系我即可:@kkkygh
👍4🤮1
货源多多 欢迎团队 工作室对接。 唯一客服:@kkkygh
👍6🤬2🤮1
招收代理~有量你就来,躺赚模式。 不会做的可以先找拿一张先做 ,冲冲冲。 备好 USDT 拿货方便快捷,不懂的咨询客服下载交易所 快捷 方便 ✅在线客服:@kkkygh
💩1🤮1
目前一切交易 主要USDT 少量支付宝和微信 还有很多兄弟不会玩币的有空学习下吧,黑灰产必备!交易只接受USDT 欧易:USDT交易流程详述 1️⃣在欧易主页点击购买数字货币 2️⃣进入买币页面选择:我要买-USDT(泰达币),可选择支付宝、微信、银行卡进行购买; 3️⃣购买成功后,返回主页面点击下方导航栏:资产→点击划转,将购买的USDT从法币账户划转至通用货币(币币账户); 4️⃣最后点击提币,选择币种(USDT),链名称(TRC20),输入提币地址,输入数量后点击提币即可完成交易。 Okex APP 注册/购买地址: https://www.okex.com 下载Okex: https://www.okex.com 建议用okex 没有提币时间限制 如需帮助咨询:@akhd23
👍3💩1🤬1🤮1
解决86+不能私信问题 +86用户 双向聊天限制,无法私聊问题请看 向官方 @SpamBot 发送消息申请(跟着提示操作就行) ,几分钟后即可解除限制 步骤: 1 发送内容 /start 2 点击按钮 But I can’t message non-contacts! 3 点击按钮 NO,I’ll never do any of this! 4 发送内容 accidentg
👍3💩1🤮1
✅【 新人常见问题汇总】 1、为什么10张起? 因为是平台自动发卡,每次发卡,后台接口对下发数量有要求,零售你们一天拿不了几张,我们一天也出不了几张,费时费力大家都不挣钱。 2、有没有风险? 兑换虚拟充值卡无风险,充值卡属于匿名物品,任何渠道可以出售可以自用。只要在充值卡有效期内兑换即可,平台所发卡密有效日期3-6个月左右。有效期内出现不能兑换情况,工作室负责! 3、支付成功,多久收到充值卡密? 系统24小时自动发卡:当成功支付后,联系机器人自行提取即可。也可联系人工客服提取。 4、为什么用USDT支付? 相信很多人都知道数字货币USDT,中文名称为泰达币。其发行方式为1:1与美元挂钩,即1个USDT可以兑换1美元。同时也为了保障会员隐私安全,通过USDT支付是目前最稳定的! 5、为什么工作室自己不置换? 首先1个账号每天的回收限额是5000,而工作室每天需要兑换的量都接近千万,目前还在快速增长中。而且众所周知国内的外…
👍3❤1
✅项目介绍 卡密回收项目,通过手机话费充值卡帮菠菜平台洗货,你从我这里拿话费充值卡再到闲鱼上回收赚差价。 比如你中国移动面值100元的充值卡,现在闲鱼回收价格98.2元,我这里拿货价85元。也就是你在我这拿这张卡,再到闲鱼回收可以赚13.2元,闲鱼一个号每天可以回收50张,也就是50*13=650元。 这是一个账号,一天可以赚的钱,卡卷是官方回收,不需要等待别人来买,只要输入卡号卡密,大概2分钟之后就可以成功回收,然后官方就会帮钱直接转到你支付宝。 公司规定拿货最低10张起,85元1张,如果还不会操作的,可以先申请买一张测试卡去熟悉一下流程,遇到什么问题问我们就行。 全程辅助回收成功,平台卡都是对接通道的电子卡包,购买后直接发文档电子卡密,我这边是一个通道代洗货,你只管销卡就行,别的不需要问,别说没有信任什么的,你信我就开始,不相信就别做,别浪费彼此的时间,机会不是为所有人准备的!
👍5
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @xyxihuo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,206,707 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@xyxihuo named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 6 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“偏门/话费卡/洗货/高利润 唯一真货” (@xyxihuo), 18 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xyxihuo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.