Channel
@xynell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001896929427 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xynell |
| Description | † Хелло-хелло † Здесь вы можете увидеть творчество с вампирчиками и всякими готическими вайбами🦇 Как говорится, welcome🤍 |
| Created | 30 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xynell |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 32 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 32 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
88 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 36 | 40.9% | |
| 💋 | 30 | 34.1% | |
| 🍓 | 22 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🙄 Недавно вернулась в кукиран после большого перерыва и ну мне не мог не понравиться Silent Salt Cookie. Я хз, что буду с этим делать, проработанный скетч или полноценку. Сейчас мой комп разобран из-за ремонта, так что сделала первые шаги на ноуте в старой версии CSP (и бля насколько же удобная новая версия по сравнению с ней), так что буду заканчивать на этой неделе как комп обратно соберу
🍓2💋2🕊2
Артов нет, потому что автор хуярит шпаклёвку на стены своей комнаты и страдает, так что вот вам годовалый скетч с Эллен🙂
🍓3💋2🕊2
🌹 Такая вот шапочка для твиттера вышла Знаете, хоть это не полноценка, а всё же больше проработанная зарисовка, мне она почему-то нравится больше, чем тот же арт с Ноем, с которым я ебалась так долго..
🍓2💋2🕊2
🌹 Делаю шапочку для акка в твиттере
🍓2💋2🕊2
Я вот всё думаю начать снова вести Твиттер, но так, чисто постить сами арты для набора англоговорящей аудитории и выходить, потому что ебала я в рот с твиттерскими общаться
💋2🍓1🕊1
Вообще заметила, что последние два арта, что я постила после "возрождения" залетают преимущественно на русскоязычную аудиторию, хоты года три назад мой контент залетал англоговорящим и, внезапно, испанцам И как-то они пощедрее в плане взаимодействия с контентом.. 👿
🍓1💋1🕊1
🤩Что-то мне непонятно, залетает арт или нет. Подожду наверное до завтра. Если так и останутся несчастные 200~ просмотров, буду использовать тактику "спамить видосами пока один из них не залетит"🤩
🍓2
Я только щас вспомнила, что хотела ему на пальцы колечек понатыкать, ну ладно, останется бедным 🤷♂️
🕊3
Сейчас буду постить в тт, делайте ставки, залетит или нет, учитывая отвратительные алгоритмы 🏃♂️
🤩 Наконец закончила этот арт с Ноем Лучше б его голым рисовала, честное слово, я эти геншиновские дизайны на хую вертела😢 Арт в хорошем качестве в комментах⬇️
🕊5🍓2💋2
💍 Держите что-ли випку с красивым камушком Долго конечно я с этим артом ебусь, но процесс и то, что выходит, мне благо нравится
🕊3🍓2💋2
🍷 Работаю-работаю.. Сегодня в доме выключали свет. Видимо, не хотят, чтобы он был закончен😊
🕊4🍓2💋2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @xynell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,062,564 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“_xynell_” (@xynell), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xynell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.