Channel
@xyctchannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001612132708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xyctchannel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xyctchannel |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 14 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 13 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 13 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌭 | 9 | 52.9% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2023 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
突然想起高中毕业时暗中给自己定下的人生目标，要为了获取更多知识而行动。可以说这是没有目标的情况下，为了寻找目标而不得不设立的目标：因为知识越多，未来定立目标时就越容易。 而我过去几年总体上确实贯彻着这个目标，也是同时导致我感觉青春荒废的原因：大多数的知识，对于任何事情都无用。 可以说人生已经进入一个新阶段，因为我已经从作为bootloader的第一个目标中获得足够信息，来定立更有价值的目标：不是为了获取更多知识，而是要为世界做出更大的正向影响。
机缘巧合下回到了阔别6年的小别野，目之所及的所有东西都在将思绪拉回6年前。当年的焦虑，当年的憧憬，当年的骄傲和遗憾，一切都成了过眼云烟。 6年前的自己想象中的未来是怎么样，而实际又是怎么样的呢？可以说大体上还没有偏离得太严重：如愿从南大毕业，走上了不算太差的coding岗位。 但这一切似乎又不是以我当年想象的方式发生的：从6年前的6年前开始，持续困扰我的睡眠问题，至今依然没解决，甚至心脏功能大有衰退之势。牙齿健康问题，鼻窦健康问题，视力问题，长期被忽视和压抑。人际关系，物是人非，想留的人留不住。心理状态近3年来都维持在勉强不会死的状态。 心中有一种感觉，最贴近它的表述是：don’t walk gentle into that good night，而我很显然正在这良夜中无忧地安眠。 一种观点认为，人的一生应当这样度过，在他回顾往生时不会因碌碌无为而感到羞愧。而我今天的感觉让我发现这句话并不是装逼，而是对一种真实心理过程的写实…
好好好，调成中->日->英后不出所料出现了向我展示日语的应用 可惜还没拿到匈牙利电话卡，不然高低得登进去跟片假名大战八百回合
识别到我是+86于是决定向我显示越南文的神经APP，莫非是按国旗相似度匹配语言的？ ———— 我知道了，我的系统语言优先级是：中文->日语->越南语。中文和日语他都不支持，于是就显示了越南语 是一年前的我高估自己的语言学习速度了🥲
我太可爱了wwww
🌭2
两个梯子加起来没用到50M流量，感觉我是给机场做慈善的。。（不过确实便宜，且机场主还挺可爱的🥰）
🌭2
大鲸鱼～ 内部视角晚上可能有，因为下午要去秋游～
🐳1
仍然无法回答最根本的问题：人生的意义是什么。一位旧友总是说，人生没有意义。一位新友总是说，人生的意义就是要爽。但前者是在语言层面逃避问题，而后者是在逻辑层面逃避问题：我所指的当然是战略层面，甚至更高层面的行动纲领，而不是把所有物质都拆解到质子、中子、电子的粒度，而认为这就是世界的本质。 我曾经以为，能够更多更详细地理解这个世界，可以作为人生纲领性目的。但现在又发现，对这个指标的度量本身就是主观的：拿物理定律做比方，如果你认为他们都是真的，那就是理解了；但一旦考虑到我们并没有证明任何物理定律，而仅仅是没找到反例，所以本质上都只是猜想时，似乎又感觉什么都没有理解。 而且，这个指标对于完整的“我”来说，并不是“完备”的。怎么讲呢？“理解”这件事，只依托于“思想”而存在。但“我”的存在，显然很大一部分是“身体”的形式。甚至就“思想”本身，也分为“感觉”和“逻辑”两部分，而”理解”似乎只讨论了“逻辑”的部分：感觉的部分被完全无视了。 …
突然发现一件事：好像并不是所有跟我熟的人，都应该是我的朋友。我是说，有些人可能对他了解很深，但相处下来对自己只有消耗。这样的人，应该主动采取措施让他远离我。 🤔似乎有许多现成的词描述这个道理。这种行为似乎可以用“疏远”描述。“疏远”的条件似乎可简单描述为“喜欢”与否…
😭
迟早交代在这儿
😇1
新的频道名，意味着我的人生进入了新的阶段。是的，我已经成为社畜超过一年了。学生时代的纠纷和瓜葛，就这样烟消云散吧。新的挑战永远在前方迎接着我们。
👍2😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @xyctchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“从零开始的社畜生活” (@xyctchannel), 14 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xyctchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.