Channel
@xxyq3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,497subscribers
-66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003536252895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xxyq3 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 11 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xxyq3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 1,497 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:11 | 1,515 | -28 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 1,543 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 1,563 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 1,563 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
473 reactions across 8 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 238 | 50.3% | |
| 👍 | 96 | 20.3% | |
| 😭 | 33 | 6.98% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 4.23% | |
| 🤡 | 19 | 4.02% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 3.81% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 2.11% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 1.90% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 1.48% | |
| 😇 | 6 | 1.27% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.27% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 1.06% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.846% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.211% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.211% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 473reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
实锤曝光：福利来所谓“担保公正”，到底公正在哪里？ 今天，6月28号晚上，信心与勇气 @xxyyq 福利来188公群这件事，我直接摊开讲。 我在188公群连续下注半小时，最后盈利1.2万U。期间客服全天在线，全程看着我下注，没有任何提醒，也没有任何制止。 可等我收手、赢钱结束后，平台立刻找仲裁木木冻结我的钱，逼我退款。 下注的时候不说话，赢钱之后才跳出来讲规矩。 这不是公正，这是只等玩家输，不能让玩家赢。 既然今天你们要处理这笔账，那富贵集团PC加拿大那笔旧账，也别继续装看不见。 骰子各个群走势不一样，如果我是在骰子赢钱被扣，我认，半句废话没有。 但PC开奖是全网同步，我同一时间在外平台下注一样能赢，开奖结果根本不受你们群操控。 当初我在富贵PC赢55400U，你们直接全额划扣。 可4月5号早上，我在富贵输了将近50万U的时候，富贵却一口一个“正常接待”，半个字不提补偿。 别说我翻旧账。 这段时间我持续大额输钱…
❤46👍19🤡9😭7👏6🤣3
大家早上好，我是信心与勇气，也就是赌狗们口中的信心老师，很高兴来到飞机跟赌狗们一起打狗庄，经过这段时间对赌狗们的了解，99.99%的赌狗赢不了钱的原因，首先我不管你手里有没有子弹，大多数人都有一个想法，觉得我的本金足够可以慢慢磨慢慢倍投，这种打法属于理性同时也是最傻逼最赢不到钱的打法，狗庄最喜欢你们这帮人，说白了你一直小额小额的打，给你一条20-30口的龙你也赢不到钱，大多数赌狗遇到长龙他们内心的越赢越恐惧，反而金额越打越小，这种人就是敢输不敢赢，好不容易靠时间磨出来一点点，一黑几下直接上头，长龙断了就开始后悔刚才为什么没打，因为你是废物你连自己的内心都不相信，你配赌博吗，这种人跟送钱有什么区别？赌博只有一种人狗庄是最怕也是最讨厌的，那就是上去直接拼命的人，打几口就直接跑，跟他拼命一条龙来了狗庄就要倾家荡产，为什么诚信 高进 C罗包括我能赢大钱，我们都是上去就跟狗庄拼命我们不会打什么所谓的叠加慢慢磨，我们上去就是奔着干死他的，狗…
👍20❤16🔥4🥰4👏3🤣3
家人们信心与勇气的故事从这里开始，一路过五关斩六将，杀遍狗庄，赢了8000万人民币的故事（最后本金1.7） 一个赌狗至今保留我的辉煌战绩，一路陪我走过来，感谢🙏 穷时独善其身，富时心怀天下 ---信心与勇气
❤25👍6🤣1
信心与勇气在这里为赌狗们创建一个大家庭 聊天探讨打狗群，邀请TG的赌狗们加入 赌瘾来了就上 @duyin 将记录每一位赌狗的高光时刻，最新动态资讯 我们是赌狗要有共同的目标 我们的目标是什么？ 打倒狗庄，让他们家破人亡，妻离子散，无家可归，最后沦为丧家之犬🐩 https://t.me/duyin
❤3
在这里给TG赌狗的一封信💌 故事才刚刚开始，很多人输钱了就要死要活，你那点负债算什么，你不妨看看许家印许老板，为什么人家还没要死要活，你输一点钱就开始要死要活，我非常看不起这种废物，而我面对当下的处境，信心只会越兴奋，突破自己，突破死局，唯有梭哈才能上岸，一个赌狗最怕的是输了信心与勇气，因为你害怕所以你成功不了，在这里告诫赌狗们，你是心住大别墅还是想住出租屋，怕就进厂打螺丝，输赢非常正常，要相信自己能创造奇迹，在TG的生态每天都有奇迹，为什么不会发生在你身上，因为你是一个废物，你不敢赌不敢拼，信心与勇气只是摔倒了，还没摔死，很多人开始落井下石，而落井下石的这帮人不都是挂壁仔，乞丐也有三年好运，一个赌狗从来缺的都是信心与勇气，为什么我赢了8000万我还要干，从始至终都是赌狗被狗庄打死，我也想打死狗庄，让狗庄们妻离子散，家破人亡，敬请期待！ 为什么日本🇯🇵那么小的国家他就敢对外开战 靠的是什么 靠的天皇的信仰，你一个赌狗靠的是什么…
❤50👍28👌10🔥10💩4🏆1😁1
家人们 休息了这个月度过了人生最难熬的一个月 抽了上下50条烟 ，还好命大钱亏了人还在，赌博给人要窒息的感觉，手机都干碎了好几个，等我好消息吧 调整一段时间，狗庄们等着我吧我会带着信心与勇气再次归来，厮杀狗庄是我这辈子的梦想，赌狗们记得替我报仇，一定要让狗庄痛苦，让他们睡不着，这段时间我也让很狗庄家破人亡，也值了，休息了有事留言 @xxyyq 5个号兄弟们本月在福利来赌博 前无古人 后无来者，心在滴血🩸 总赌博输了 2976605U 359492U 1009436U 1820652U 3483663U 合计🟰9649848U人民币6600万 赌博无情兄弟们，量力而行
❤37😭26👍13🤡10😇6🔥3🥰2💩1
回归了家人们 这次带着信心杀回来了，赌神们一定要记住 每天睡醒就得出征打狗庄，让狗庄睡不着，让狗庄痛苦，给我杀
❤32👍10❤🔥9👏4🔥3
兄弟们等我回归 这段时间先休息在研精蓄锐
❤29👏5😱4
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @xxyq3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 453,249 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“信心与勇气厮杀狗庄 @xxyq3” (@xxyq3), 1,497 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxyq3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.