金富🕹当日流水 🧧红包规格 68U 2026U/888份 218U 1888U/666份 688U 2888U/555份 2188U 3888U/444份 5888U 4888U/333份 8888U 5888U/222份 🧧今日红包已发 领取频道 @jinfubaojiang 1.所获得彩金需完成六倍流水即可取款。 2.如发现同IP注册多账号套利、异常投注等等违规行为,平台有取消资格,收回彩金,封禁账号的权力。

Channel
博彩社【赌狗日记】
@bocaishe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
5,796subscribers
-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002065199924 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @bocaishe @qijijiaoyi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bocaishe |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 5,796 | +12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 5,784 | -23 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 5,807 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 5,819 | +14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 5,805 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 5,808 | -31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 5,839 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 5,839 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 5,839 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.5%
- avg views ÷ 5,796 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,710
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.113%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (3 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,973 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 01s
- Average length
- 3m 31s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 40.9% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
全是熟人 有没有德州高手?
金富德州:点击进入 小金团队 面向全网 活动火爆进行 公平公正 信誉有保障
👍1💩1🤡1🤮1
Signed 小金 U酷哈希筹备中 @kkkkkk
博彩社·赌狗日记(TG大事件) 🌌:9万U不翼而飞?巨富娱乐疑遭“方阳”入侵,富贵集团开出50万美金悬赏! 🌌:400万U盈利之后宣布退网?“扫雷大Boss”Men的传奇故事,到底发生了什么? 🌌:200U→29.4万U→归零!老头距离30万U仅一步之遥,最终为何没能收手? 欢迎大家投稿TG大小事件!奖励红包
👍1
Signed 奇迹
兄弟们? 你们在干嘛?
👍3
Signed 奇迹
Posted without readable text
Signed 奇迹
♠️ 这一局,等你落座。 🎲 房名:金富德州超级VIP 20/40/80 🆔 房号:7217666 🔰 盲注:USDT 100/200/400
Signed 奇迹
金富集团 @JinFu 金富骰子 ➡️ @JinFu88 金富电子 ➡️ @JFYX 金富德州 ➡️ @JFDZ 集团口号:把公平进行到底 金富市场运营-金主 @Jinzhu 金富集团客服-小金 @JinFu3
❤1
Signed 奇迹
金富德州 打工一天赚多少钱? 一小时德州多少钱?
❤1👍1🔥1
Signed 奇迹
金富德州VIP群邀请您进入,每周固定红包和活动会通知。 贡献度100u娱乐过的联系 @jinzhu 可进群
❤1
Signed 奇迹
TG玩德州就到金富德州 :@JinFudezhou OK扑克旗下金富德州俱乐部ID:333333 金富俱乐部 & AK俱乐部 & OK俱乐部 正式联盟 三大俱乐部德州玩家齐聚一堂,同台竞技。 真人现金局|实时对战|稳定开局 一:俱乐部采用深度结合密码学、区块链、纯随机洗牌、实时结算、充提秒结算。 二:实时音视频,纯真人、防代打、防伙牌 官方群:@JinFudezhou
❤2👍1
Signed 奇迹
🇨🇦 加拿大 vs 🇲🇦 摩洛哥 预测比分:1-1(90分钟) 备选比分:1-2、2-1 前瞻分析: 加拿大速度快,反击效率高,主场氛围也有一定优势。 摩洛哥整体防守组织更成熟,世界杯淘汰赛经验更丰富。 预计比赛节奏不会太快,双方都有机会破门,存在加时甚至点球的可能。 推荐方向: ✅ 双方进球(BTTS) ✅ 总进球 2-3 球 ⭐️ 比分:1-1 🇵🇾 巴拉圭 vs 🇫🇷 法国 预测比分:0-2 备选比分:1-3、0-3 前瞻分析: 法国整体实力明显占优,中前场个人能力和阵容深度领先。 巴拉圭防守顽强,但面对法国高强度压迫,防线将承受巨大压力。 如果法国率先进球,比赛可能较早失去悬念。 推荐方向: ✅ 法国获胜 ✅ 法国让胜(视盘口而定) ✅ 总进球 2-4 球 ⭐️ 比分:0-2
❤1
Signed 奇迹
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bocaishe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bocaishe edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“博彩社【赌狗日记】” (@bocaishe), 5,796 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bocaishe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.