Channel
@xxxxFederation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
163subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001696590940 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xxxxFederation |
| Description | What is your xxxx? Tags: #TECH #BACKUP #SERVICE |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xxxxFederation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 163 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 163 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 30 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
20 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 35.0% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[閒談 - 指數投資睇TER嘅重要性] 上回提要 以前喺香港買非槓桿美股指數基金，基本盤不外乎 QQQ (Nasdaq 100)，VOO (S&P 500)，而呢2隻喺英國嘅Tax Wrapper (ISA/ SIPP) 係買唔到嘅。咁自然就要搵替代品，不過喺我嘅圈子入面，無論身家係4位數定8位數，揀嘅多數都係比較貴嘅基金，我先驚覺原來係咁多人唔睇 Expense Ratio, 只睇 Fund size 嚟買 (甚至連Fund size 都唔睇，人哋話買咩就買咩)。 一個fund 既Expense ratio 對長期投資回報係可以有唔細嘅影響，今日手痕就順便分享下對於唔同嘅指數，我會買邊隻基金。 當然，如果要講ETF / Mutual Fund，係可以講好耐嘅 (Legal structure, Replication method, Index, Distribution policy, Currency risk, …
👏2
Signed Espouse
Heading to Ukraine soon. If I'm dead, my last words shall be 'Glory to Ukraine and Hong Kong'.
🫡4🔥2
Signed Espouse
[緊急公告 - Telegram 開源客戶端 Nekogram 被發現竊取用戶註冊電話號碼及使用者號碼] 今日，有用戶喺 Telegram 客戶端 Nekogram 嘅 Github 開咗個Issue, 指 Nekogram 開發者喺 Release Package 植入咗可疑代碼，用於竊取用戶註冊電話號碼及使用者號碼並上傳至開發者持有嘅 Bot。 及後有另一用戶同樣喺 Nekogram 嘅 Github 開咗另一個Issue ，指用戶每次透過Nekogram 登入 (連接)，Nekogram 都會通知該Bot。 用戶註冊電話號碼為高度敏感資料，詳情請按此 。 Nekogram 聲稱自己係開源既Telegram 客戶端，可以經由 Google Play , Telegram Channel 或 Github 下載。 呢次被發現既可疑代碼，並唔存在於 Github 嘅原代碼，而係藏喺開發者上載既 "Release bui…
😱2
Signed Espouse
承上文 點都好，我建議 a. 曾經嘅服務使用者、資料提供者以及合作伙伴，向相關公司就上述第 1-5 點提出正式查詢。 b. 大眾喺相關疑慮解除前，切勿向相關公司及人士提供任何個人資料或參與任何佢地舉辦或合辦嘅活動，以保障個人安全。 c. 任何人如果曾向相關公司及人士提供任何個人資料，請從速更換可以更換既通訊方式，如有必要，例如身份較為敏感既人，更應該考慮搬屋。 --------- 呀!!!仲有特務On9案，大家仔細D 睇HKB 創辦人既聲明同龍五既供詞，順便上埋HKB Social media 睇 2020年10月既 posts，你會發現好有趣既事， Keyword "Life in the UK vs Life in the UK TEST"。 我並無Imply 任何嘢，我只係提出我覺得有趣嘅地方遮。 Edit: 我知道HKB 有低調 Del Post 前科，所以我已經做左備份，大家如果有興趣就記得備份啦。 最後，再…
👍1
Signed Espouse
[閒談 - 被監視追蹤嘅人，應否繼續接觸敏感資料] 上文提要 我知道old news is so exciting，我喺2月底已經知呢件事，不過一直都冇打算講D咩，畢竟 I have no stake。 不過，既然見到D令人擔心嘅現象，而且我又得閒，咁就寫兩隻字作為消遣。 我睇完篇野, 唔係好明, 以下係相應提問: 1. "因此新組織成立後，將更審慎處理資訊，包括減少無權責人士接觸敏感資料，不再保留可追蹤紀錄" - 即係舊時無權責人士可以接觸敏感資料, 同埋會保留可追蹤紀錄?點解新組織只係減少而唔係杜絕? 2. 就港共蟈安提出嘅要求，「我們配合了一部分，但沒有完全照做。」 - 配合左D咩? 我相信所有The Hong Kong Scot / Scottish Hongkongers 曾經嘅服務使用者、資料提供者以及合作伙伴，都值得一個直接而且詳盡嘅回應。 3. "憂慮一旦資料在未經授權下外洩，或令在港合作夥伴及相關人士被識…
😁1
Signed Espouse
頻道管理員已經做完要做嘅嘢，本頻道以及 @Espouse 帳號現回歸封存狀態。 有關野子追究部份英國港人組織、CIC、港人媒體、議員或個人事宜，頻道管理員會繼續提供所需協助，直至野子滿意為止。
👍4👎1
Signed Espouse
仲喺香港既人, 識做啦?
Signed Espouse
[閒談 - 1210投廢票定唔投票定取消選民登記？] 是日放假，咁啱又見到以下呢篇 "新聞"，諗起久唔久就見人為 "應該投廢票定唔投票定取消選民登記" 嘈到面紅耳赤， 每次都諗唔明有咩值得嘈。 廉署：任何人煽惑他人令選票無效可能干犯《選舉條例》 https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1730018-20231129.htm 其實，香港區選投票率對比英國 local election 算係非常高，所以港共成日自我安慰話香港繁榮安定，投票率低並唔意外，呢點表面睇並唔係完全唔合理。 所以，要最大程度侮辱港共政府，唔係拉低投票率，而係要 1. 取消選民登記 2. 人人投廢票，仲要用個章寫哂所有 "禁語" 多人取消登記減低基數，高投票率代表人民求變，高廢票率代表你唔認可任何選項，寫 "禁語" 係逼佢展示，同埋誘使佢進一步 "完善" 點票過程，逼佢喺 "不停公開自我侮辱" 同 "黑箱點…
Signed Espouse
https://www.threads.com/@hmtwinter/post/DRzWrI7jBIu 100% respect. Let's see how we can pick up the database.
👍2
Signed Espouse
大家好，我係 #何歡喜 ，相信大家都為 #中國香港 #大埔 #宏福苑 大火感到難過，但何歡喜感到更多嘅係悲憤。大家作為愛國愛黨嘅中國香港人，當然要要求 #中央政府 直接處理呢一件事，我要求嘅係炒咗李家超，炒咗鄧炳強，何歡喜頻道絕對一定百分百肯定無意煽動同推翻中华人民共和国政府同中國香港特區政府！ https://c.org/QPS5zPLh25 #香港加油 願逝者安息
❤1
Signed Espouse
[放負] 長年不作為，仲整埋呢D野，比埋D false sense of security 呃鳩D市民，講撚到自己做咗幾多野。 嘩! 喺個誠信名單度喎! 嘩! URA 個網度拎好高分喎! 嘩! 份標書D公司簽哂反圍標聲明喎! 有撚用咩? 呢D垃圾機構根本冇做 due diligence，根本就係用黎呃CV，保自己後門，根本就係呃鳩班業主 宜家出左人命，即刻落哂remarks 同strikethrough 係你班港共走狗同市民講佢地信得過嫁! 係! 你地落撚哂 Disclaimer，仲有港共加持，邊撚到到班 Top management 上身? 咪又係最多捉個SM 祭旗。 但係咁樣唔會改變到 URA 同 ICAC 有份害死200個人，令幾千人無家可歸，可能終身都走唔出個陰影。 香港勝在有ICAC? 市建局真係有向業主提供資助及技術支援? 屌你老母成班殺人幫兇 [/放負] ————————- 希望大家持續幫忙整理11.…
Signed Espouse
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @xxxxFederation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,003,544 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“xxxx Federation” (@xxxxFederation), 163 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxxxFederation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.