Dn.

Channel
Challenge
@xxxsiruissss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002450416381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xxxsiruissss |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xxxsiruissss |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 10 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 12 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 11 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 9 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 8 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 7 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🆒 | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
بیوت رو خالی گذاشتی شناسایی نشی عطر فروش؟🤨
آرامگاه خاطراته یا رد روم؟
معجون شناسی؟ مگه تو عهد باستان مغازه داری این چیه دیگه...
🍾1
یکم دیگه تگ چنلتو ادامه میدادی میرسیدی ماه☝️🏻
پروفایلت تهیونگه، تگ چنلت جونگکوک بیوت پسرامون... امیدوارم توی زندگیت قدرت انتخاب داشته باشی.
سگ افسردگی خیمه زد روم بعد چک کردن چنلت.
💯1
تهیونگ پروفایلتو ببینه دچار شرم نیابتی میشه نکن جان جدت.
عکس بیکیفیت تر نداشتی برای پروفت؟
چنلت چخبره؟ پروف هیونجین پست از بیال و بیتیاس؟ محتوات شبیه خواب هامه یدونه ترامپ کم داره.😂😂😂
🆒1
نیم، پروف چنلت و ایموجی بغل نیمت انقدر ربط دارن به هم که نابود شدم.😂😂
امیدوارم وضعیت روانیت مثل تم چنلت بی ثبات نباشه.😂😭
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xxxsiruissss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@diaryoflove11 · 1051 postㅤ٭ 𝖤𝗅𝗎᥎ᥱ́
@eli7dwarfsbora · 3201 post معجون شناسݷ ( 🔒 )
@MagicBrews · 2501 post 𝖤𝗆𝗉𝗍𝗒 𝖲𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖾
@mixoOz · 1951 postㅤS𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗈ყ
@mni_junkook · 6031 postسَـمفونـےِ مَهتـآب '
@moonpianist · 1,1181 post ㅤ 𝚶𝖻𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗂꯭𝖺𝗇
@obsdin · 7281 post𝖯︎𝖾𝗋𝖿︎𝗎𝗆︎𝖾 𝗁︎𝗈𝗎𝗌𝖾| rest
@perfume_housS · 1301 postit's tee scent 🪐
@teeteepor8 · 2851 post⋆ 贰𝖢𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗒𝖡𝗂𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗌
@TwoCrazyBitches · 31 postآرامگاهِ خاطـرات|🆕
@xmoonmap · 1711 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Challenge” (@xxxsiruissss), 10 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxxsiruissss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.