谁来帮我训犬

Channel
宝宝
@xxx2005714
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,409subscribers
+1,243 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003278450213 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xxx2005714 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xxx2005714 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 6,409 | +114 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 6,295 | +90 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:02 | 6,205 | +230 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 5,975 | +187 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:43 | 5,788 | +196 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 5,592 | +191 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 5,401 | +186 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 5,215 | +49 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 5,166 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
76 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 64.5% | |
| 🤡 | 13 | 17.1% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 9.21% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
得吃~
❤4
24包天11点之后可以约~,
【成都龙凤阁·书苑已验证】 花名:#丹宝 车牌: @baoba885 收费:#600P #1000pp 包时1300 坐标:#市二医院 特征: 年龄:20岁 身高:166厘米 体重:60公斤 罩杯:D罩杯 标签:#舌吻 #调情 #情趣诱惑 #态度车 #制服诱惑 #深喉 #骚逼 【福利】:“成都龙凤阁•修车群”,出击8次免费一次 【免费上牌】 推荐人:(真 希波) 总结:早早就约上了课,私聊的时候语音叫着老公,像个小女友一样。等待是一个令人焦灼且期待的过程,终于在周四这天晚上如约跟丹皇见上了面,她进门的一瞬间,我的视线一直审视着面前的丹皇,傲人的双峰,漂亮的美甲,还有这一具让所有男人都愿为之驻足的肉体,摄魂心魄,叽叽喳喳的讲述着今天所遭遇的事情,女友感十足。由于丹皇走路过来的,很累,于是我们便躺床上休息了一会儿。我很喜欢听丹皇讲有关于她的事情。 聊着聊着,看着眼前令人血脉喷张的肉体,二…
❤7🤡2
得吃
双飞报告1️⃣ 【双女主角】:香菜 & 丹宝 @xcovocx @baoba885 【花了多少】:2300+2300➕200 【身材如何】:香菜 170/125 丹宝 168/120 均为顶级沙漏微型bbw 【芳龄几许】: 均20左右 【颜值描述】:香菜为美萌轻熟风 丹宝为大眼甜美风 【凶器罩杯】:顶配双大D/F 【空中服务】:不间断同时组合进行的:无🍑口,👅批,大蟒🐍,轮换做,时刻左拥右抱,上下同行。 【优点缺点】:双圈内顶级微型bbw,大胸大屁股,身姿妖娆;都非常敏感,日感顶级,两位喷水娃像竞赛一般,持续潮喷;情绪价值足,同时不同的服务能弥补各自不足:如香菜无69,丹宝却很喜欢你舔她;丹宝口技稍逊但香菜口舌生花… 唯一不足:由于刚开双飞不久,配合还有少许生疏,偶尔会尬住,流程不够丝滑;且双巨乳bbw配置,喜排骨者劝退。 【推荐程度】:9.5/10 0.5分主要是价格有一定门槛,不过物以稀为贵,个人觉得值满分 【飞行…
❤10🤡8💩3
24🉑约上门~宝宝们~照片以前嘟
❤3
宝宝 pinned a photo
新菜单骚逼们~可以上门了
❤5😈1
今日上门中~@baoba885
❤3
饿死了
问我双飞的~看 总价:4h 4600 3次8h 6500 4-5次 包天 24h 10520 无限火力🔥
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xxx2005714. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“宝宝” (@xxx2005714), 6,409 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxx2005714.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.