Channel
@CDCJFL
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
6,513subscribers
+525 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003936399156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CDCJFL |
| Description | 成都出击福利收录频道 深夜打飞机直接点开就开干！ #成都 #出击 #福利 #老师 #修车 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CDCJFL |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 6,513 | +471 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 6,042 | +54 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 5,988 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (6 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 72,339 |
| Reactions total | 178 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
178 reactions across 29 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 39.9% | |
| 👍 | 59 | 33.1% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 14.6% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 6.74% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.25% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.25% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
你会因为在电报上看到其他城市老师的频道，各种福利视频照片美图，心里面惦记着以后去那个城市约这个老师吗？
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#姊姊 @zizi525305 光之国福利频道更新出击实拍福利 看奶子还挺拔 报告有优惠！
❤4
看着这么清纯可爱的妹儿，居然是一个反差骚母狗女装机 昆明的一个嫩妹老师， 来自昆明迪迦福利频道的出击实拍， 露脸 口交 做爱 调教 母狗视频 看了评论区链接视频不想来一发的是这个👍
👍6🔥2❤1
😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚽世界杯官方指定博彩平台 😍开云集团旗下亚洲最顶级博彩平台 😍体育 H5版 — WEB端入口 😍体育 PC端 — 网页版入口 😍体育 全站APP — APP下载 🔤🔤小程序，免实名-不限IP-U存U取 😍😍😍😍😍😍😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 匿名首选 📱飞投入口 ⭐首存加赠2⃣5⃣🔣复存加增1⃣0⃣🔣 ⭐足球/篮球/电竞首单包赔1⃣0⃣0⃣🔣 ⭐真人无门槛双边返水0⃣🔣9⃣🔣仅限飞投版 ❤❤❤❤ @MKFTWL🧸 ⚡⚡⚡⚡易换支付钱包，1⃣0⃣亿🔤资金池储备 ⚡⚡⚡⚡全网5⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣万🔤担保，拒绝野鸡台 ⚡⚡⚡⚡千万域名，豪客之选 网页入口 ❤❤❤❤代理分润 5⃣5⃣🔣 @MKFT888 ❤❤❤❤ @MKFT777 关注🔈😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 t.me/rdsjo 掌握东南亚一线动态，看清风向料定先机 频道每周抽取100名TG会员，群发言积分兑🔤
更新收录性价比福利老师 300米一🔥的嫩妹，还可以拍不露脸福利视频， 我还能说什么？这还要啥自行车 可舌吻 69 口 拍视频 #黑曼巴 @hmb000777 学生会上新嫩妹！频道还有嫩妹实拍嫩B 你们来评价一下吧 交流群组👉 https://t.me/CDFL9999
❤4👏2🔥2👍1
#果儿 @meili20241 也是成都名师了，云长出击福利频道更新！
👍2❤1👏1😁1
#佐佐 @zz6688zzj 这B拍得太粉嫩了！ 来自猫哥的福利频道更新，嫩妹嫩B
❤1👍1👏1🔥1
昆明的迪迦光之国更新妹儿实拍出击福利 曦曦 @jizi2008 成都的朋友看看福利打打飞机
❤3👍3
果然是极品，连颜值都是 被群友找到分享出来了！ @FTyic1 可惜不是成都的，是深圳的老师
❤5👍3👏1🔥1🥰1
嫩妹群上新嫩妹 #小歆歆 @abh343536 来自大锤的福利频道更新实拍 皮肤看着就光滑，胸也挺拔
👍2👏2❤1🔥1
#姗姗 @shan4169 emmmmm这是个TS哦 不多说了，还得是大锤的TS福利频道
❤3👍1🔥1
😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚽世界杯官方指定博彩平台 😍开云集团旗下亚洲最顶级博彩平台 😍体育 H5版 — WEB端入口 😍体育 PC端 — 网页版入口 😍体育 全站APP — APP下载 🔤🔤小程序，免实名-不限IP-U存U取 😍😍😍😍😍😍😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 匿名首选 📱飞投入口 ⭐首存加赠2⃣5⃣🔣复存加增1⃣0⃣🔣 ⭐足球/篮球/电竞首单包赔1⃣0⃣0⃣🔣 ⭐真人无门槛双边返水0⃣🔣9⃣🔣仅限飞投版 ❤❤❤❤ @MKFTWL🧸 ⚡⚡⚡⚡易换支付钱包，1⃣0⃣亿🔤资金池储备 ⚡⚡⚡⚡全网5⃣0⃣0⃣0⃣万🔤担保，拒绝野鸡台 ⚡⚡⚡⚡千万域名，豪客之选 网页入口 ❤❤❤❤代理分润 5⃣5⃣🔣 @MKFT888 ❤❤❤❤ @MKFT777 关注🔈😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 t.me/rdsjo 掌握东南亚一线动态，看清风向料定先机 频道每周抽取100名TG会员，群发言积分兑🔤
❤2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @CDCJFL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
你会因为在电报上看到其他城市老师的频道，各种福利视频照片美图，心里面惦记着以后去那个城市约这个老师吗？
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 463,883 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成都出击福利导航” (@CDCJFL), 6,513 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CDCJFL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.