Channel
@xxllnn05
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004484474915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xxllnn05 |
| Description | 私聊：@xxllnn01 双向🤖️：@xxllnn03_bot 开课频道：https://t.me/xxllnn02 |
| Created | 30 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xxllnn05 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 17 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:47 | 17 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (30 August 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 373 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】小玲珑 【联系方式】@xxllnn01 【所在位置】天河区 【验证留名】他说 【验证时间】9.3 【修车费用】500p 【颜值身材】嫩妹高颜值，萝莉大胸型。 【服务内容】舌吻💋69，口爆，乳交 【服务态度】态度很好，不催不机车 【优点缺点】长得漂亮，身材好。 【推荐程度】10分 【体验细节】见面第一反应，500的价格有这样的极品老师，迫不及待给水费，拉着老师坐在沙发上就开始腻歪了，色从心中起，胆从两边生，亲了一会儿去洗澡，开始享受服务，好温柔，小小只，抱在怀里很满足，小女友的感觉太美妙，边洗边占便宜，把玩着老师的胸部，屁股也很有手感，腰肢纤细，盈盈一握，皮肤白嫩紧致细腻，触感很好，洗完澡抱着老师来到床上，缠绵在一起，没想到比我还骚，极度的反差感，超主动的舌吻，从床上到沙发到阳台，到厕所，到厨房，都尝试了一遍，日感极好，口活和服务也是挑不出毛病，紧致…
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】小玲珑 【联系方式】@xxllnn01 【所在位置】天河区 【验证留名】 匿名 【验证时间】 26.09.02 【修车费用】 5p 【颜值身材】 9 【服务内容】 9 【服务态度】 10 【优点缺点】 健谈、不催⏰ 【推荐程度】 10 【体验细节】 老师小小只，皮肤白，面容精致，身材比例好。刚在广州下海，服务态度很好，各种要求不过分都能满足。小穴紧、滋润，屌感好。值得推荐。 ♥️温馨提示: 以上仅代表个人体验，报告仅供参考！ 👎🏿府上专员严查假报告！写手代谢出门右转！ 报告提交：@Chenyaoyao1_bot
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】小玲珑 【联系方式】@xxllnn01 【所在位置】天河区 【验证留名】QY 【验证时间】9月2日 【修车费用】500 【颜值身材】玲珑剔透，浑然天成 【服务内容】XCZ，🐻推，💋 【服务态度】耐心，温柔 【优点缺点】不能独享 【推荐程度】⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【体验细节】进门一只娇滴滴的“小兔子”静待你的到来，眼睛水灵，脸蛋精致得以为在天宫，有上去拥抱的冲动，嘘寒问暖一番后，交学费，蠢蠢欲动，差点露出狰狞的面孔，好在义务教育的洗礼下，克制了原始的兽欲，保持彬彬有礼，等待小兔子的温柔以待。褪去包裹，白白的酮体，完美的曲线，举手投足都能为之动容，你只要静静的待在原地，小兔子口腔的热度就能把弟弟的水流蒸发，感受高端SPA的舒爽。之后引导到玉床上，开始了共赴巫山的胜境体验（此处省略一万字，自己来体会）。直到离开也完全没有催促，走在路上，还余犹未尽，期待未…
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】小玲珑 【联系方式】@xxllnn01 【所在位置】天河区 【验证留名】天蓬 【验证时间】9.1 【修车费用】500p 【颜值身材】10分 【服务内容】舌吻，69，口爆，陪浴，胸推 【服务态度】女友感，超听话，超温柔 【优点缺点】满满的情绪价值，嫩，好看，小巧玲珑，胸大，真胸， 【推荐程度】💯 【体验细节】进门我还以为碰到我的前女友了，高颜值，萝莉型，娇小玲珑，抱着刚刚好，会关心人会聊天，态度特别好，身材前凸后翘，和推特小萝莉一样，白嫩白嫩的，未结婚未生育，舌吻很主动管饱，挺敏感，容易高潮，不耐桩，小穴紧致能听到水声，叫床声音挺好听，满满的女友感，刚开课没有准备丝袜制服，没有毒龙，不过这个价格也是无敌了，八百九百的我感觉都比不了，人漂亮服务好态度好价格低，和其他老师比起来简直无敌。 ♥️温馨提示: 以上仅代表个人体验，报告仅供参考！ 👎🏿府上专员…
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】小玲珑 【联系方式】@xxllnn01 【所在位置】天河区 【验证留名】西门不吹穴 【验证时间】9.1 【修车费用】1000pp 【颜值身材】小巧玲珑，细枝结硕果，瘦底，颜值10分 【服务内容】主动式舌吻，69，口爆。 【服务态度】温柔体贴听话 【优点缺点】颜值高，身材好，可以抱起来搞 【推荐程度】满分 【体验细节】小玲珑老师，人如其名，颜值身材并存，嫩妹一枚，800的质量，500的价格，夯爆了，最满意的一次出击，人照基本一致，白嫩的皮肤，真胸，紧致的小穴，敏感点很多，服务也是顶中顶，打爆很多会所出来的老师不在话下，很主动，我只需要把脸凑过去 老师就会吻上来，用力的索取，小巧玲珑的身材一把抱入怀中，用力的疼爱，女上很卖力，老师自己把自己动高潮了，满满的情绪价值，叫床声也很好听，第一次高潮后巨大的反差就来了，真的骚，说实话真怕老师在了解广州的行情后涨…
❤2
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @xxllnn05. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小玲珑的报告频道” (@xxllnn05), 17 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxllnn05.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.