我休息啦哥哥们等我回来呀爱你们么么哒💋

Channel
欣欣后花园
@xx35357
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
164subscribers
+68 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004138522786 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xx35357 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 25 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xx35357 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 164 | +55 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 109 | +13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 96 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 332.3%
- avg views ÷ 164 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 545
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.127%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 5,995 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
【评价时间】:2026-07-30 【老师名字】:欣欣 【学生名字】:匿名 【人照相似】:10 【身材评分】:9 【敏感程度】:9 【主动程度】:10 【敬业程度】:10 【综合评分】:9.5 【总分】:9.58 【出击描述】:人照确实十分一致,老师是真的无敌嫩,也是真的夸张的紧,紧到后入的时候夹得我直疼 by:🌈沈阳丶全城热恋: @SYQCRL
刚满18岁
❤1
开课
【评价时间】:2026-07-29 【老师名字】:欣欣 【学生名字】:1星 【人照相似】:10 【身材评分】:10 【敏感程度】:10 【主动程度】:10 【敬业程度】:10 【综合评分】:10 【总分】:10 【出击描述】:好好okok可以可以 by:🌈沈阳丶全城热恋: @SYQCRL
❤1
开课
喜欢我刚满十八岁的嫩妹来呀
现在有空
开课
【评价时间】:2026-07-27 【老师名字】:欣欣 【学生名字】:匿名 【人照相似】:10 【身材评分】:10 【敏感程度】:10 【主动程度】:10 【敬业程度】:10 【综合评分】:10 【总分】:10 【出击描述】:老师人照基本无差,就一个字,嫩嫩嫩,太嫩了,上面下面全是粉的,又粉又紧,妹妹干净,一点味道没有,吃起来无敌,嗦到嘴里,喜欢嫩妹的冲冲冲 by:🌈沈阳丶全城热恋: @SYQCRL
【评价时间】:2026-07-27 【老师名字】:欣欣 【学生名字】:Scott 【人照相似】:10 【身材评分】:8 【敏感程度】:10 【主动程度】:10 【敬业程度】:10 【综合评分】:9 【总分】:9.5 【出击描述】:老师特别嫩,刚成年没几天。紧,口不说停不会停,这里给到夯,别的没什么服务,需要自己开发,老师性格特别好,基本有求必应,性价比可以。但是环境确实一般,希望老师可以挑几个好的屋子, by:🌈沈阳丶全城热恋: @SYQCRL
【评价时间】:2026-07-27 【老师名字】:欣欣 【学生名字】:BIG godWx 【人照相似】:10 【身材评分】:10 【敏感程度】: 【主动程度】: 【敬业程度】: 【综合评分】:10 【总分】:10 【出击描述】:好评,忘记拍照了,经过跌宕起伏的一天,终于在最后约上了一位老师,只有一个字《嫩》年轻是真年轻,但会的确实太少,老师很好,笑起来很好看,但今天经历了太多不顺心,状态不好,最后✈️发射 by:🌈沈阳丶全城热恋: @SYQCRL
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @xx35357. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,176,891 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“欣欣后花园” (@xx35357), 164 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xx35357.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.