Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for xstreetcalls

Channel

xstreetcalls

@xstreetcalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

180subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002010622172
TypeChannel
Username@xstreetcalls
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 14 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xstreetcalls

Growth

1801861837 August 2026 — 186 subscribers8 August 2026 — 185 subscribers8 August 2026 — 185 subscribers15 August 2026 — 183 subscribers30 August 2026 — 182 subscribers9 September 2026 — 180 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 179–187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 14:22180-2
30 Aug 2026, 06:07182-1
15 Aug 2026, 16:15183-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:17185no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:04185-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:29186first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1242.9%
932.1%
👀310.7%
💯310.7%
🤣13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2024 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 02:34 UTCviews —

xstreetcalls pinned «every meaningful $BTC development. written once. no noise. — if it's here, it matters — if it's quiet, nothing mattered — the full story is in the post, no click needed receipts + history → notis.gg/btc also on X → x.com/btcnotis turn notis on 🔔 @btcnotis»

6 Jul 2026, 02:33 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @btcnotis

every meaningful $BTC development. written once. no noise. — if it's here, it matters — if it's quiet, nothing mattered — the full story is in the post, no click needed receipts + history → notis.gg/btc also on X → x.com/btcnotis turn notis on 🔔 @btcnotis

20 Oct 2025, 22:02 UTC76 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

zora 👇 https://x.com/xstreetbets/status/1980393652951318704

11 Sept 2025, 07:02 UTC92 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

idrawline agrees. A3frFUizT1XYA28x5C5pf8UnuaUufmkpm73V8AY5WgBY

10 Sept 2025, 03:07 UTCviews —

xstreetcalls pinned «Creator capital markets A3frFUizT1XYA28x5C5pf8UnuaUufmkpm73V8AY5WgBY https://x.com/xstreetbets/status/1965612804456808629»

10 Sept 2025, 03:07 UTC90 viewsread 8 August 2026

Creator capital markets A3frFUizT1XYA28x5C5pf8UnuaUufmkpm73V8AY5WgBY https://x.com/xstreetbets/status/1965612804456808629

6 Sept 2025, 19:30 UTCviews —

xstreetcalls pinned «The ticker is $BALL, tomorrow will be fun 🔴 https://x.com/xstreetbets/status/1964166766487040428»

6 Sept 2025, 03:21 UTC113 viewsread 8 August 2026

The ticker is $BALL, tomorrow will be fun 🔴 https://x.com/xstreetbets/status/1964166766487040428

20 Nov 2024, 23:42 UTC226 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

the conversation between you and your girl before you go off to the trenches like you're headed off to war 🤣

🔥3🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xstreetcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“xstreetcalls” (@xstreetcalls), 180 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xstreetcalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.