Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

xrgv.tv (18+)

@xrgvtv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

89subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001552150809
TypeChannel
Username@xrgvtv
Descriptionaka funnitas funnitatum aka сука смертная все соцсети доступны по тегам @xrgvart и @aveegrex
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/xrgvtv

Growth

898 Aug 2026, 10:00 — 89 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:16 — 89 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:009 Aug 2026, 15:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88–90 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 15:1689no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:0089first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,730
Videos
100
Links
220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5939.3%
custom 62087129611213235662516.7%
😭2114.0%
custom 5278373321971344663106.67%
🥰106.67%
🤝96.00%
🌭74.67%
👏74.67%
😨21.33%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 23:02 UTC254 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Прикоснулась к Ателье колдовских колпаков и ощутила какую-то безграничную нежность. Я аниме-онли (пока что), поэтому сужу только по тому, что вижу, но как будто весь проект насквозь пронизывает какая-то трогательная, чуткая, осторожная любовь. И в отношениях Кифри и учениц, и в отношениях Кифри и Олругио, и в тонкой плетенке мира - везде безграничная, беспардонная нежность. Действительно такого не хватает в медиа в

custom 62087129611213235668🥰5

29 Mar 2026, 15:47 UTC390 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вчера мне исполнилось 27. Подумалось, что пора вернуться. Отсюда меня вытащила нехватка времени из-за работы и учебы. Мне предстоит еще несколько месяцев в таком интенсивном режиме. Да что там, возможно, и после этого я придумаю что-то, что будет занимать у меня все свободное время. Разумно было бы не отказываться от канала и всех чудесных людей, кто сюда пришел, а вести его посильно. Так и поступлю - без громких о

custom 620871296112132356617

10 Aug 2025, 23:09 UTC955 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Что, почитать завтра с комментированием последние глав эдак 6?

🔥10

10 Aug 2025, 23:09 UTC936 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

возможно, во мне что-то сломано, но я поняла, что не хотела бы абсолютно радостную концовку для Ван пис (хотя я только что посмотрела На западном фронте без перемен, так что можете делить все эти рассуждения надвое) Я бы хотела, чтобы в самом конце Луффи испытал что-то схожее с тем, что было на Сабаоди - бескрайнее, душащее бессилие. Может, ему помогут, может, он придумает что-то и справится, но пусть хоть на секун

🤝9

9 Aug 2025, 11:00 UTC788 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @xrgvfm

У Люцифера травма отвержения. First born. Seeking validation from the significant adult. Вы когда-нибудь чувствовали необходимость соглашаться с самими ужасными словами любимых, чтобы от Вас не ушли? Чтобы в Вас не увидели «очередного, кто просто уйдет»? Доказать свою нужность. Важность. Верность. Верность, не ложность. Вас когда нибудь заставляли годами балансировать между клеймом предателя и клеймом коллаборанта?

🔥8

9 Aug 2025, 11:00 UTC537 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @xrgvfm

АНГЕЛАМ ПЛЕВАТЬ НА ПОЭЗИЮ. ЧЕЛОВЕК СИЛИТСЯ И ДАВИТ ИЗ СЕБЯ ЯМБЫ И АМФИБРАХИИ, ИЗ НЕГО ТЕКУТ ГЕКЗАМЕТРЫ, НО АНГЕЛ НЕ ПОНИМАЕТ. АНГЕЛ СЛИШКОМ СВОБОДЕН. ИХ СВОБОДА БЕСКОНЕЧНА, ОНА НЕ СПОТЫКАЕТСЯ ОБ ОГРАНИЧЕНИЯ РЕЧИ И ЯЗЫКА, ОНИ ОДНО С МИРОМ И НЕ ОБЛАДАЮТ ТОЙ ЗАКЛЮЧЕННОЙ В ТЮРЬМУ ИНДИВИДУАЛЬНОГО СОЗНАНИЯ САМОСТЬЮ, КОТОРАЯ МУЧАЕТ ЧЕЛОВЕКА. У АНГЕЛОВ НЕТ ЯЗЫКОВ. НЕТ УШЕЙ. ОНИ СЛЕПЫ НО ВИДЯТ ВСЕ. ОНИ ЕСТЬ ВСЕ.

🔥7

12 May 2025, 15:18 UTC≈1,450 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

сказки 1001 ночи написал человек, который не мог заставить себя ничего написать, и ему потребовалось внести в свой творческий процесс себя и того, кто угрожает ему расправой за НЕрассказывание историй стопроц

😭13

9 May 2025, 12:10 UTC≈1,060 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

сделаю вам шашлык за поцелуй. женщинам два по цене одного.

👏7🥰5

9 May 2025, 09:49 UTC818 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

отношения на расстоянии это сложно

😭8

8 May 2025, 18:00 UTC562 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😨2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @xrgvtv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 976,727 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“xrgv.tv (18+)” (@xrgvtv), 89 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xrgvtv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.