Channel
@xqzyinyue
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
311subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002322832556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xqzyinyue |
| Created | 18 December 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xqzyinyue |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 311 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 318 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 318 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (18 December 2024 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢bgc越南 bgc小菲 ... 📢露脸,露内,漏奶 📢皇冠私网🅰️亚星私网�... 📢皇冠招商 皇冠娱乐 欧博... 📢欧博私网 欧博假网 亚星... 📢马来西亚云顶博彩平台 📢亚星百家乐 利博百家乐 ... 📢狂人日妓|赏花阁🔞 📢ntr 换妻 📢媚黑 黑鬼 📢环球异事|未解之谜|奇闻... 📢利博代理 利博官网 真人... 📢飞机会员-TG账号-代开... 📢财神集团（博彩）平台 📢美女图片-美女视频-性感... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢🔰开元官方🔥代理70%|电子棋牌|AG百家乐 📢 全网最全面、最便宜的自助引流服务 🚀蓝图数据🚀SDK+DPI｜106通道技术分析全行业💰技术实力诚邀合作🔥 📢 飞驰号铺 [主营：飞机号 开会员 代充星星] 📢东南亚今日头条|新闻|爆料|悬赏|通缉|吃瓜缅甸妙瓦底大揭 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHel…
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢游侠客旅行 📢人间易拉罐🔍 📢自说自话的总裁 📢小颖💞｜实用工具分享 📢农村艳舞团 📢开云体育 米兰体育 电竞... 📢澳门桑拿👍24小时接送... 📢三立iNEWS 📢贷款数据🔥企业贷🔥助... 📢哈萨克女孩 Kazash... 📢兼职妹子每日更新频道 📢韩国女生Judy 📢所遇皆美好 📢抖音快手直播裸舞-头条-... 📢新盛赌场-百家乐-龙虎-... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢球速体育相信品牌的力量、老品牌值得信赖、不限ip、免实名。 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 📢⚽️注册送138🧧百家乐/棋牌/电竞体育信誉平台 📢 Ton 中文索引 📢💎85.CC电子百家乐0审核包出款支持汇旺提U 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速增长。
❤1
来自Ton流量小助手推荐 📢反差少女小女精神小妹—2... 📢世界历史|人文|地理|漫... 📢高端外围上门服务【真实靠... 📢江门中山95-98 📢黑料吃瓜 📢全国上门服务【面付】真实... 📢美食攻略（厨艺大比拼） 📢高端外围上门服务【真实靠... 📢生理少女|私密讲座 📢Telegram 中文知... 📢电影|剪辑|墨逗❤️ 📢（九郎出品）影视动漫 📢甜御女神💢黑丝旗袍🤷... 📢妈妈｜乱伦熟女｜母子 📢性感黑丝 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢蕾丝舞社官方频道 📢在 Telegram 中拥有属于自己的商店，开启您伟大的事业。 📢小夜数据🔥一手源头 📢官方收量🔥诚邀站长SEO流量大佬合作 📢 X Panel 商店 [主营：苹果ID] 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速增长。
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
❤3
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @xqzyinyue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 660,330 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@xqzyinyue named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小强仔-车载音乐🚀/炸街DJ📀/私房歌单🎙” (@xqzyinyue), 311 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xqzyinyue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.