Channel
@xpertindc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
115subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002618086903 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xpertindc |
| Created | 13 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xpertindc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 115 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 113 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 114 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 114 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 13 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 98.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2025 to 5 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
XPERT Indicator 6/14 - 7/5 Performance Summary Timeframe: 15-Minute Only (using our advanced buy/sell signals and key price levels) Signals Issued: 66 Results: • +3750 Pips ✅ • +77.85 Rr Gain ✅ • -13 signals loss❌ • Win Rate: 80% Accuracy (53 Wins / 66 Signals)
❤6
Weekly XPERT Indicator 6/9 - 6/13 Performance Summary Timeframe: 15-Minute Only (using our advanced buy/sell signals and key price levels) Signals Issued: 38 Results: • 5 day ✅ • +2150 Pips ✅ • +46.25 Rr Gain ✅ • -7 signals loss❌ • Win Rate: 81% Accuracy (31 Wins / 38 Signals)
❤5
Weekly XPERT Indicator 6/2 - 6/6 Performance Summary Timeframe: 15-Minute Only (using our advanced buy/sell signals and key price levels) Signals Issued: 47 Results: • 5 day ✅ • +3125 Pips ✅ • +66.5 Rr Gain ✅ • -5 signals loss❌ • Win Rate: 90% Accuracy (42 Wins / 47 Signals)
❤3
Today’s XPERT Indicator Performance Summary Timeframe: 15-Minute Only (using our advanced buy/sell signals and key price levels) Signals Issued: 8 Results: • 1 day ✅ • +605 Pips ✅ • +12.25 Rr Gain ✅ • -1 signals loss❌ • Win Rate: 85% Accuracy (7 Wins / 8 Signals)
❤3
Today’s XPERT Indicator Performance Summary Timeframe: 15-Minute Only (using our advanced buy/sell signals and key price levels) Signals Issued: 7 Results: • 1 day ✅ • +705 Pips ✅ • +11.25 Rr Gain ✅ • -1 signals loss❌ • Win Rate: 85% Accuracy (6 Wins / 7 Signals)
❤4
Note: This performance is based solely on the 15-minute chart. If you’re a scalper, you could have captured even more profits using additional entries. ⸻ 💡What’s Next? Once you purchase the indicator, we’ll provide you with a full step-by-step trading plan showing exactly how to use it effectively To join contact @adm_gx
❤3
Today’s XPERT Indicator Performance Summary Timeframe: 15-Minute Only (using our advanced buy/sell signals and key price levels) Signals Issued: 8 Results: • 1 day ✅ • +825 Pips ✅ • +16.85 Rr Gain ✅ • -1 signals loss❌ • Win Rate: 87% Accuracy (7 Wins / 8 Signals)
❤4
Members feedbacks ❤️🔥
❤3
On top of all that, the Xpert indicator gives you its own ( buy/sell with tp ) signals completely separate from the premium levels. These signals are generated based on a different strategy, so you’re getting two powerful tools in one:) high accuracy signals from Xpert, and proven key levels updated daily by our expert team.
❤3
That was a free signal based on our premium levels updated daily by experts. As you saw, once price broke above the resistance, it was a textbook buy. These aren’t just random levels Gold respects them consistently across all timeframes. Our subscribers get full trading plan showing how to place SL and TP If you want to trade with confidence and precision, this is your edge
❤4
What a beautiful morning +12R and +495 pips Precision, patience, and clean execution more to come, just getting started
❤4
Today’s XPERT Indicator Performance Summary Timeframe: 15-Minute Only (using our advanced buy/sell signals and key price levels) Signals Issued: 14 Results: • 1 day ✅ • +1205 Pips ✅ • +26.3 Rr Gain ✅ • -4 signals loss❌ • Win Rate: 71% Accuracy (10 Wins / 14 Signals)
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @xpertindc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 408,404 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XPERT INDC⚡️” (@xpertindc), 115 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xpertindc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.