Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Xoxo_boy

Channel

Xoxo_boy

@xoxoboyOfficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

607subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001810060805
TypeChannel
Username@xoxoboyOfficial
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xoxoboyOfficial

Growth

60711 Sept 2026, 04:22 — 607 subscribers12 Sept 2026, 15:41 — 607 subscribers11 Sept 2026, 04:2212 Sept 2026, 15:41
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 606–608 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 15:41607no change
11 Sept 2026, 04:22607first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 6 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

889 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21724.4%
❤‍🔥17019.1%
😭9911.1%
custom 53617619717440384589510.7%
custom 53167885832086016459010.1%
custom 5314299215868871131859.56%
💘515.74%
🥰252.81%
🔥202.25%
👍131.46%
👏50.562%
😍50.562%
😨40.45%
🤯40.45%
30.337%
💔30.337%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 889 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 12 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2025, 14:33 UTC≈4,790 views217 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Всем привет! Это владелец этого фан-аккаунта. Очень не хотелось принимать это решение, но, к сожалению, фан-аккаунт XOXO_BOY больше не будет существовать. Это решение я приняла ещё летом этого года. Возможно, вы заметили, что в TikTok и Telegram каналах стало гораздо меньше контента, связанного с Ваней. Причина одна — некоторые могут подумать, что я слишком о себе возомнила, но я всё же хочу объяснить. Я начала слуш

😭98custom 53142992158688711314028🥰21custom 53167885832086016459🔥4🤯4custom 53617619717440384584

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

8 Oct 2025, 04:10 UTC≈3,850 views92 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 536176197174403845834custom 531429921586887113126❤‍🔥13custom 5316788583208601645136

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

5 Oct 2025, 09:37 UTC≈3,530 views64 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @muztvVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

45❤‍🔥9💘73

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

5 Oct 2025, 09:37 UTC≈3,170 views31 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @muztv

Уже в 14:00 узнаем, что в плейлисте у XOLIDAYBOY в новом выпуске шоу «Моя волна» на МУЗ-ТВ🔥🔥 Не пропусти❤️ @muztv

25❤‍🔥2custom 53167885832086016452custom 53617619717440384582

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

3 Oct 2025, 19:55 UTC≈2,950 views67 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥40🔥119💘6😍1

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

23 Sept 2025, 11:33 UTC≈3,140 views68 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня просыпаюсь, а мне говорят, что почти все билеты на второй концерт в ВТБ Арене проданы.. Если бы мне пару лет назад сказали, что это возможно и что столько людей хотят послушать нашу музыку, я бы никогда в это не поверил.

💘3314❤‍🔥14custom 53167885832086016457

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

17 Sept 2025, 07:00 UTC≈2,550 views63 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

40custom 53167885832086016458custom 53617619717440384588😍4❤‍🔥2😭1

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

10 Sept 2025, 04:33 UTC≈2,470 views55 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

33❤‍🔥7🔥5custom 53617619717440384585custom 53167885832086016453💘2

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

10 Sept 2025, 01:03 UTC≈2,050 views58 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥29custom 531429921586887113112👍65😨4👏1custom 53617619717440384581

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

10 Sept 2025, 01:03 UTC≈2,500 views35 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥225👍4👏4

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

7 Sept 2025, 11:02 UTC≈1,740 views77 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 536176197174403845841❤‍🔥12custom 531678858320860164511custom 53142992158688711317🥰42

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

6 Sept 2025, 22:38 UTC≈1,600 views62 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 531678858320860164537❤‍🔥175💘3

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆✞

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @xoxoboyOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

xolidayboy
@xoxoliday · 57,523
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Xoxo_boy” (@xoxoboyOfficial), 607 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xoxoboyOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.