Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elyor - IT Blog

Channel

Elyor - IT Blog

@xoliqulov_elyor

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

290subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537506103
TypeChannel
Usernames@elyordev @xoliqulov_elyor
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xoliqulov_elyor

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

290295292.57 August 2026 — 294 subscribers8 August 2026 — 294 subscribers15 August 2026 — 295 subscribers15 August 2026 — 295 subscribers23 August 2026 — 292 subscribers23 August 2026 — 292 subscribers9 September 2026 — 291 subscribers14 September 2026 — 290 subscribers17 September 2026 — 290 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 41 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 289–296 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 02:40290no change
14 Sept 2026, 07:59290-1
9 Sept 2026, 17:36291-1
23 Aug 2026, 09:06292no change
23 Aug 2026, 06:36292-3
15 Aug 2026, 11:39295no change
15 Aug 2026, 11:07295+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:15294no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:12294first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 50s
Average length
1m 57s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1943.2%
🔥1534.1%
👍613.6%
24.55%
🤯24.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xoliqulov_elyor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC54 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

True.... Claude code masovafiy boshqarish (Remote Control) funksiyasi tufayli ish va shaxsiy hayot muvozanati buzildi.

6 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC104 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Urush, ▪️ Uzum marketga foydasiga ishlamoqda.

🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @times_officialuzFile

⚡️⚡️Ўзбекистон илк бор “ишончли давлатлар” рўйхатини тасдиқлади. Энди Ўзбекистонда фаолият юритувчи компаниялар АҚШ, Буюк Британия, Япония, Жанубий Корея ҳамда Европа Иттифоқининг деярли барча давлатларидаги серверларга фойдаланувчиларнинг шахсий маълумотларини қўшимча рухсатсиз узатиши мумкин. Бунда маълумотларнинг тарқалиб кетишининг олдини олиш бўйича зарур чоралар кўрилиши шарт. Бу Google, Apple, Microsoft, Met

👍3

28 Jul 2026, 03:56 UTC208 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anti_agiPhoto

Пацан сказал — пацан сделал. Moonshot AI открыли веса Kimi K3. Уже на HuggingFace. Развернутый техрепорт. @anti_agi

22 Jul 2026, 03:42 UTC160 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sariqdevVideo

🚨 OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol modeli Huggingface platformasiga hujum qildi.

😁1

21 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC171 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Claude Xotiram Claude bilan sinxronlashib qolganday, xotiraga yozib qo'y demqochi edim o'zi bilib qilmoqda.

😁3

21 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC150 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uxeruz

Ideas beat prompts Instagramda juda ko'p blogerlar aktiv ko'paytirish maqsadida o'z sahifasiga, "shu ishni AI bilan qanday qilganim haqida bilmoqchi bo'lsangiz, commentda keyword ni yozib qoldiring va men sizga maxsus prompt yuboraman" deb post joylaydi. Comment qismida esa bir dunyo odamlar o'sha promptdan foydalanib ko'rish uchun keyword ni yozganini ko'rasiz. Lekin muammo prompt yoki bloger da emas, muammo biz o

👍1🤯1

19 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC106 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mukhammadkarim_tukhtaboev

Bir dengizchidan "Ahvol qalay?" deb so'rashganda, "Yomon emas, lekin cho'kyapmiz" degan ekan. Bu gap ham bizni sohaga tegishli. Ayniqsa, AI davrida "AI-First Thinking" ni o'ziga do'st qilib olganlar haqida. @mukhammadkarim_tukhtaboev

17 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC192 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Kimni uyida hozir svet bo'lsa baxtli. Lekin bilasizlarmi o'zbeklar lyuboy vaziyatdan pul qiladigan odamlarde, shotda ham reklama yoqishgan.

😁61

15 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTC190 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @times_officialuz

❗️1 ноябрдан телефон рақамларга эгасининг розилигисиз SMS-реклама юбориш тақиқланади. Реклама қўнғироқлари ва хабарларини 18:00 дан 09:00 гача тарқатишга ҳам йўл қўйилмайди — Президент қарори. @times_officialuz

🔥31👍1

14 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC224 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Kimdir telegramni tagiga suv quyapti shekili-a)

😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xoliqulov_elyor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elyor - IT Blog” (@xoliqulov_elyor), 290 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xoliqulov_elyor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.