Channel
@xmzybgpd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
207subscribers
+44 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003962685606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xmzybgpd |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 17 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xmzybgpd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 207 | +36 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 171 | +8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 163 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 163 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,127 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【验证时间】：9-7 【妹子艺名】： #影子 【场所类型】：城中村 / 海沧 【安 全 性】：8 【修车水费】：2P 【人照几成】：8 【身高体重】：目测160 【胖瘦赘肉】：不是瘦的类型。 【凶器罩杯】B到C吧 【老师类型】：乖巧型 【服务类型】：快餐 【服务态度】：ls态度还可以，不会催人 【优点缺点】：ls态度好，能简单聊的来 【自由发挥】： 进门，看到老师，比照片大致接近。ls拉出床垫在地上半事，隔壁有邻居开着门，老师确认没关系。聊了几句，开始传教士位置输出，ls皮肤有点弹性。因为没有变换姿势，一撸到底，输出体位有点硬。其他良好。快餐型。 【推荐程度(自身主观评分)】8 联系方式： @yingzi1213
【日期】：9.6 【验证技师】： #影子 【地 区 】：海沧新垵 【颜值人照】：8 【服务水平】：8 【服务价格】：200 【皮肤身材】：8 【服务详情】：今天晚上刚看见挂出来就立马约了一下，城中村地址也比较好找，屋子里面的环境也比较好。老师跟照片差异不大，稍微胖了一点点，但是肚子上面没有赘肉，身材皮肤都比较好，尤其是戴着眼镜，搞起来感觉就比较不一样了。老师说在床上搞动静太大就铺张床垫在地板上搞，即使搞的是快餐说要洗澡也会让你去洗一下，洗完搞硬后老师会细心的帮你戴好套，后面搞了十几分钟左右就结束了，任意换姿势，也不会催人。总的来说200这个价格性价比很高，态度也挺好的，推荐兄弟们过去试试看 联系方式： @yingzi1213
【验证日期】：9.6 【验证老师】： #小妖 【地 区】：思明加州广场 【服务价格】：4升级6 【人照几分】：8.5 【胸部状况】：C到D，挺，乳头小，粉嫩 【优点缺点】：房间干净，身体紧致，皮肤白嫩细滑 验证过程及感受:跟老师约好时间，摇控上楼，见到老师的第一眼：气质有品味。 跟老师聊了会天，交费洗澡 洗的很干净，小弟弟翻过来翻过去的洗，水中箫时就特别有感觉…… 移步到床上，先b后a，服务一条龙，跟之前的莞式服务没差……老师下面好紧，我一个指头都塞不进，感觉比18.19岁小姑娘下面还要紧，我从来只做95服务的人，因为我戴套压根没感觉…这会我直接升级到98，果然没让我失望…终于有个让我破例的老师了！因为我自己原因截套没感觉，最后还是老师给口出来的…但一定会复刷！ 联系方式: @xiaoyao9678
【验证日期】：9.6 【验证老师】： #柔柔 【地 区】：厦门翔安 【服务价格】：400全套 【人照几分】：9 【胸部状况】：c 【优点缺点】：服务好 今天喝了一点小酒，有点微醺就想着找个妹子快乐一下，在群里面一眼就相中了柔柔老师，果断联系，打车出发十多分钟就到了，位置很好找，一进门就被老师的黑丝深深地吸引住了，小老弟肃然起敬，老师帮我简单的冲洗了一下随后就直奔主题，老师的嘴巴特别灵活把小老弟整得醉生梦死，差一点就泄了，我赶忙让老师停下，老师也很懂，随后开始了经典的传教士体位，老师的下面紧紧的暖暖的包裹着小老弟，让我只想大力的回应着老师，听着老师嗯嗯啊啊的声音，数个回合后便败下阵来。 总的来说柔柔是一个性价比很高的老师，下次有空一定还会去找柔柔老师。 联系方式： @TTianzi88
【验证日期】：9.3 【验证老师】： #子欣 【地 区】：同安 【服务价格】：600 【人照几分】：99 【胸部状况】：c➕ 自然手感软滑 【优点缺点】：情绪价值很好 验证过程及感受:天青色的烟雨，而我在等你。 很不容易约到老师头课， 水中萧，老师口的技术见长（相当好评），让我发现三日不见，当拔吊相见。 从浴室服务到床上，传教发车，哥哥的妹妹叫爽爽。 看着窗外雨夜，稀稀拉拉的下雨，弟弟鼎力相助于妹妹。 老师超级有耐心，也很细心，女友感满满。值得多次刷 联系方式: @hujianzhou12 https://t.me/xmzyjlqnew
【验证日期】： 【验证老师】： #叶子 【地 区】：集美 【服务价格】：600包时 【人照几分】：7 【胸部状况】：大小刚好，但下垂 【优点缺点】：态度很好进门就宝贝宝贝的叫，屁股挺大后撞着还行但是感觉下面有点送紧点就yyds了，肤色没频道看的那么白有点黄 验证过程及感受:进门ls就连连宝贝的叫，然后立马交了水费就脱光光进浴室了，ls洗的挺细完了帮擦，上床开始口，不知道我大还是ls技术有待提高有齿感，想69的但是ls说没这服务，然后硬邦邦了戴套传教士开干，干了一会来感觉了想吸奶子ls不喜欢不给无奈只能闷头干发射了，歇了十多分钟，开始二番战后入几分钟交货赶紧洗洗下班，爱爱全程有点迁就ls，要不是ls态度还行直接甩脸走了体验感一般般 联系方式: @xiaoyezi https://t.me/xmzyjlqnew
【验证日期】：8.28 【验证老师】： #子欣 【地 区】：同安 【服务价格】：600p 【人照几分】：90 【胸部状况】：C➕手感很棒 【优点缺点】：情绪价值高 验证过程及感受:进门热情的招呼哥哥，互相洗，水中萧，超敏感体质，就像水浒里面的浪里小白条，一碰就开始入水游起来，全身敏感，情绪价值很足，哥哥，爸爸，老公都会叫，总说她受不了。 从床上到浴室，到窗户，妹妹真的太贴心，一点都不会没有耐心。中间休息，搂着妹妹，摸着大🐻，软软的，妹妹说很有安全感。 奈何最近劳累，发挥不好，超级体验感，妹妹说她很满足。 联系方式: @hujianzhou12 https://t.me/xmzyjlqnew
【出击时间】：9.1 【验证技师】： #自渡 【颜值人照】：8 【服务水平】：8 【服务价格】：320 【皮肤身材】：8 【服务详情】：已经是老回头客了。最近雨多天气不好，又来找老师，还是一样的热情，奔放，服务面面俱到，先是口活伺候，卖力良久以后，带上套套，一顿女上差点被夹出来，赶紧传教士一顿挺近，在腰酸背痛中，终于喷射，瘫软床上，跟老师唠嗑了一阵，洗洗，跟老师拥抱一阵，啧，过几天再来。 联系方式： @zdzy710
【验证日期】：9.1 【验证老师】： #晨晨 【地 区】：湖里区 【服务价格】：1200pp 【人照几分】：本人 【胸部状况】：c 【优点缺点】：很健谈 验证过程及感受: 没有赘肉 肉紧致 皮肤滑 屁股翘服务内容：毒龙 舌吻 AB 面 激情艳舞 口活真他妈的好优点缺点：进门服务的明明白白基本全自动服务顶级完全不用自己动特别是帮洗口活毒龙ab面安排的明明白白口活技术好差点快交代了情趣衣服也多可以自选玩法多样上位后入等等满足各种要求 但是可能很多哥哥也是喜欢的试试看就知道略人照95%吧总之要服务干就完了 联系方式： @qwetta66
【出击时间】：8.27 【验证技师】： #自渡 【颜值人照】：8 【服务水平】：8 【服务价格】：220kc 【皮肤身材】：8 【服务详情】：已经是老回头客了。烈日当空，唯有老师的房间能让我静下心来。刚一进门，老师便迎了上来，关切地问我热不热、累不累，让我先歇一会儿。简单交流几句后，我便冲了个澡。 然而，短暂的清凉并没有让我真正平静下来，反而让心里的燥热愈发明显。随后两人相拥上床，气氛也逐渐升温。先由女上位开始，随着彼此不断深入，老师渐渐酥麻难耐；随后转为平躺的节奏，接着换成传教士式，循序渐进，在一次次起伏与呻吟中逐渐加快节奏。 最后转为后入式，彻底进入冲刺阶段。十分钟后，一切终于落下帷幕。整场体验从最初的燥热，到中途的投入，再到最后的释放，过程连贯而尽兴，确实是一次令人印象深刻的体验。 联系方式： @zdzy710
【验证日期】：8月23号 【验证老师】： #花腿腿 【地 区】：集美 【服务价格】：6p 【人照几分】：10分(人照一致，比照片还好看) 【胸部状况】：36C 【优点缺点】：身材好，服务好，姿势全配合 验证过程及感受: 第一天刷到，第二天就忍不住想去验证一下，跟妹妹联系好，洗了个澡就过去了，因为路上开车的原因，时间又没跟妹妹对接好，导致到了楼下罚站半个小时，上楼后，开门第一眼首先确认人照是否一致，因为被忽悠过本来都做好照骗扭头就走的准备，结果妹妹完全没有忽悠人，洗完澡就开始做服务，吹了一会我都觉得受不了，太会了，19岁还有这技术，简直不可多得，于是让妹妹给我带上套，干了再说，先是妹妹在上使劲榨我，干了一会妹妹累了，换我在上，狠狠冲击妹妹的鲍鱼，干了一会又换妹妹趴着后入，后入的第一感觉就是身材好，视觉冲击很强，拍打妹妹的屁股干了好一会，让她站起来手背在后面，头抬起来边撞边蹂躏妹妹的胸部，干得妹妹低声哼哼唧唧，因为动作…
【验证日期】：8月21号 【验证老师】： #花腿腿 【地 区】：集美 【服务价格】：6p 【人照几分】：9分 【胸部状况】：C 【优点缺点】：身材好皮肤好，接受度高 验证过程及感受: 早就在频道里关注她多时了，在一个暴雨的下午，终于约上了心心念念的花腿腿。妹纸地方很好找，略微在楼下瑞幸等了一小会，一收到信息就急忙上楼了。开门见面，妹妹比我想象中要高一些，不是传统意义的小只马，但身材凹凸有致，目光上移，长相也和频道一致，正是我喜欢的类型。 交完水费就来到卫生间开洗，妹妹有帮洗，可能是卫生间空间小的原因，身体距离的接近也让心理觉得更亲近了。洗好后来到床上，妹妹开始展示她的👄技，考虑到妹妹能接受舔逼，我这种👅教中人直接让妹妹换成69姿势，狠狠吃一顿鲍鱼。数十回合之后👅饱了，拍拍妹妹翘臀示意进入正题。女上开局，一坐上来就感受到强烈的包裹感，很紧，妹妹也堪称女骑士，上下节奏把握得很好，每次又深又重的起落差点让我没把持住。随后…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xmzybgpd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“厦门资源共享报告频道” (@xmzybgpd), 207 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xmzybgpd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.