Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔏переезд| плачу от красоты сю минхао

@xmhdctarchive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

953subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728446139
TypeChannel
Username@xmhdctarchive
Created13 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xmhdctarchive

Growth

953956954.512 Aug 2026, 20:46 — 956 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 18:15 — 953 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 20:4613 Aug 2026, 18:15
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 953–956 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:15953-3
12 Aug 2026, 20:46956first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

817 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33240.6%
custom 535933961877902358513216.2%
💘10913.3%
custom 5292142978532404498799.67%
🤯617.47%
🍓344.16%
🔥212.57%
🦄141.71%
💔131.59%
❤‍🔥101.22%
💋101.22%
🐳20.245%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 817reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 26 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jan 2026, 14:46 UTC608 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

♡. • * hao’s typing 🤩 Двждвдсщвщвзвзвз. Дсдавддввдвж 🌟#weverse 🌟 #update 🌟

custom 5359339618779023585103🍓3💘1🦄1

6 Dec 2025, 08:22 UTC711 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xmhdctPhoto

CARATLAND AWARDS 2025 🌟 by @xmhdct & @junhao_m0_0n небольшое интерактив-развлечение в преддверии нового года ! будем рады, если поучаствуете и поделитесь опросом с другими 💗 ➡️ внимание ! пожалуйста, пишите канал так, чтобы мы поняли, кто это 🤲🏻 Голосование до 27.12 18:00 мск https://forms.gle/RK5tdepDnkBic6mW9

4

1 Dec 2025, 17:01 UTC711 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xmhdctVideo

😂. •✩🌟 minghao adoring and being adored by members ➡️long #thread pt.2 — 96z 🐾

custom 53593396187790235851

16 Nov 2025, 21:31 UTC≈1,040 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xmhdctVideo

😂. •✩🌟 minghao adoring and being adored by members ➡️ long #thread pt.1 — 95z 🐾

9💘1

29 Oct 2025, 15:09 UTC≈2,150 views208 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Можно реакцию, мне страшно. А точно ! Этот канал останется как архив, жалко удалять Извините за долгий скример 😋 кто со мной давно, знает, что я люблю такое;) Буду безумно признательна и рада, если вы останетесь со мной 🥰😍

custom 5359339618779023585101custom 529214297853240449848💘3915💋5

29 Oct 2025, 15:06 UTC≈1,830 views210 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Итак 😎 Это решение далось мне с огромным трудом. Первые мысли появились давно, но в последнее время я серьезнее над этим задумалась. Больше всего я переживала за свое моральное состояние, так как думала, что не вывезу (оно у меня шаткое довольно 😃) НО, взвесив все "за" и "против", я пришла к выводу, что это лучший вариант Сегодня, 29 октября 2025, история поксм завершится. Этот канал давно пошел на спад и, наверное

97🤯61💘29💔13💋5custom 53593396187790235853🦄2

29 Oct 2025, 13:04 UTC≈1,130 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как они идеально распределили роли....

46custom 535933961877902358517custom 529214297853240449811🍓2🦄1

29 Oct 2025, 12:57 UTC906 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ничего не понимаю, но он красивый.

40💘18❤‍🔥7custom 52921429785324044986🦄2🍓1

29 Oct 2025, 12:20 UTC637 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Адвокат Со Менхо 🙏

39🍓16custom 52921429785324044985🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @xmhdctarchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Oct 2025, 13:50 UTCAnonymous Poll98 voters

До или после др минхао 😞?

  1. до59%
  2. после34%
  3. Админ кнопка7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 26 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,039,787 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔏переезд| плачу от красоты сю минхао” (@xmhdctarchive), 953 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xmhdctarchive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.