Channel
@xmdbgq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
604subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002045055723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xmdbgq |
| Created | 31 October 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xmdbgq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 604 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 608 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 609 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 609 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 31 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
13 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 46.2% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 46.2% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2023 to 22 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xmdbgq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 October 2023 to 22 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
小默担保免费安全vpn 韩国线路： ss://YWVzLTI1Ni1nY206TWpka05qZ3haams0TlRBd1lqazVOVFl4WVRSak5tRmpNV1JsTUdZMQ@cn-2.tonworldnews.com:8095?prefix=%16%03%01%00%C2%A8%01%01#kr-dcc65335bd 日本线路： ss://YWVzLTI1Ni1nY206TkRNNVlqTXlOMlEzTkRRNVlURm1OR1k0WkRoa1pqWmlZak0zTm1Gag@cn-2.tonworldnews.com:9096?prefix=%16%03%01%00%C2%A8%01%01#jp-4182035900
🤗1
Signed 𝑨𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝑺𝒖𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒎𝒆
小默担保创业者计划： 欢迎执行力强的团队加入，计划将达到最高50%的收益。
❤1
Signed Admin Supreme
疯狂的小默： 我们会一直在一起，加油吧，感谢一路陪伴我们的小伙伴
❤1
Signed 小默担保-老牌TG资源负责人
大量出售888+号码
👍2
Signed 小默担保-老牌TG资源负责人
盘口和TG优质用户可申请加入小默朋友圈，分享有趣、日常、需求、话题、活动等内容。
Signed Admin Supreme
最新可用的TG代理 一键链接： 小默自费搭建高速TG代理，关闭VPN使用，请勿长时间下载超大文件，关注本频道不迷路 👉 点击使用24小时供需机器人 👈 官方频道 https://t.me/XMgongqun 赞助商 @xwwee @XMgongqun @owika @xiaomoneibu
👍3❤1
最新5个可用的TG代理 一键链接： 小默自费搭建高速TG代理，关闭VPN使用，请勿长时间下载超大文件，关注本频道不迷路 👉 点击使用24小时供需机器人 👈 官方频道 https://t.me/XMgongqun/136 赞助商 @xwwee @XMgongqun @owika @xiaomoneibu
❤3👍1
🤌欢迎来到高速TG代理免费分享频道. 此频道免费分享高速安全的翻墙梯子 TG代理长时间使用有可能会被墙，请持续关注本频道，定期更新高速免费的TG代理链接。（可定制独享代理，更安全稳定） 使用代理请关闭vpn🫶 使用代理请关闭vpn🫶 使用代理请关闭vpn🫶 【小默担保自建】
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @xmdbgq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 696,356 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小默boss朋友圈” (@xmdbgq), 604 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xmdbgq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.