Channel
@xjjpzy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001929870846 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xjjpzy |
| Created | 19 May 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xjjpzy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 7 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 7 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 19 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2023 to 29 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
编号: #XNXB2 已验证 【寻欢时间】：2023年5月20日 【寻欢地点】：#乌鲁木齐 经开万达附近（大概位置） 【信息来源】：狼友推荐、论坛、亲身体验 【服务项目】：鸳鸯浴，漫游，胸推，69式，冰火，口活，毒龙，爱爱等莞式一条龙（可选，勿必填写真实服务项目） 【妹妹数量】：1 【环境设备】：小区 【营业时间】：12-12 【价格一览】：800/次1300两小时/2300夜 【安全评估】：评分，满分100。 【服务星级】：★★★★★（最高5星）应适当评价质量 【重点推荐】:服务很好，骚，小穴会吸 【联系方式】：👉 VIP用户点击可查看联系方式 👈 点击此处 👉 开通会员 👈 【寻欢细节】：自己和妹子约好时间，地方比较好找，见面付款。妹子是我比较喜欢的类型，大长腿，瘦瘦的，还有胸也不小，洗完澡上床，妹子先调戏一下我，然后开始慢慢服务，过程很舒服，特别是毒龙和吹箫时候，差点喷了，把她按倒先来一发，插进去几下还会…
🔥1
编号: #XNXB1 已验证 【寻欢时间】：2023年5月20日 【寻欢地点】：#新疆 #乌鲁木齐 【信息来源】：狼友推荐、论坛、亲身体验 【服务项目】：鸳鸯浴，漫游，胸推，69式，冰火，口活，爱爱、SM（可选，勿必填写真实服务项目） 【妹妹数量】：多位 【环境设备】：酒店上门 【营业时间】：全天 【价格一览】：788～1588 【安全评估】：评分，满分100。 【服务星级】：★★★★★（最高5星）应适当评价质量 【重点推荐】：最值得推荐的地方以供参考 【联系方式】：👉 VIP用户点击可查看联系方式 👈 点击此处 👉 开通会员 👈 【寻欢细节】：美女神仙姐姐。很低调也很有经验，和这样的兼职女约会，你就放心好了。性格也是我喜欢她的一个原因，很亲和，还会跟你撒撒娇，就是女朋友的感觉 洗澡 调情 ，一顿乱摸乱亲之后 开始啪啪 小逼很粉紧 甚至夹的我有点痛 出来好多水 垫的枕头都湿了一半 慢慢熟悉之后我的动作也更随便…
👍2🥰1
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @xjjpzy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 501,729 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新疆精品资源 新模式” (@xjjpzy), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xjjpzy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.