Channel
@xjfdggpx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
680subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001576849264 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xjfdggpx |
| Created | 27 June 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xjfdggpx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 680 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 703 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 701 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 701 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 27 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (27 June 2023 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 142 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
12 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2023 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀😀😀低价卡网售卖商品： 美国快手 2.5元 美国微信 3元 美国抖音 6元 国卡快手 缺货 港卡微信 15元 香港支付宝（阿里巴巴全系列） 15元 全平台接码 15元 配套快手解冻思路！ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 卡网链接为： https://918.oioix.cn/links/1C2B7249 后续将增加更多商品品类 客服号 @RIGHT886886 主页双向 请勿直接投诉 售后前请先查看此频道 https://t.me/Righths888
Signed 神小悲
😀😀😀低价卡网售卖商品： 美国快手 2.5元 美国微信 3元 美国抖音 6元 国卡快手 缺货 港卡微信 15元 香港支付宝（阿里巴巴全系列） 15元 全平台接码 15元 配套快手解冻思路！ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 卡网链接为： https://918.oioix.cn/links/1C2B7249 后续将增加更多商品品类 客服号 @RIGHT886886 主页双向 请勿直接投诉 售后前请先查看此频道 https://t.me/Righths888
Signed 神小悲
Posted without readable text
Signed 虚假
https://t.me/r883rr 日常频道qwq
👾2👍1
Signed 虚假 打广
Video, posted without a caption
👍1
Signed 虚假
File, posted without a caption
Signed 虚假/业务号
难绷🤦♂️
Signed 虚假/TG低价账号/低价会员/广告号
Dear Telegram Team My channel does not support, promote, or engage in any illegal activities, including the sale of real-world firearms or prohibited goods. Any mention of terms like "guns," "gunlabs," or similar words strictly refers to in-game items and has no connection to real-life weapons or illegal transactions. I fully respect Telegram’s policies and ensure that my channel is solely focused on gaming-related…
Signed 虚假/礼物出售/TG低价账号
الموضوع: [إشعار الامتثال الرسمي | عدمسامح بالتبليغ الكاذب الضار] إلى مشرفي تيليجرام وجميع الأعضاء: تعمل هذه القناة كناصة مخصصة للتبادل الفني المحترف، وتشير إلى الامتثال الدائم للإجراءات القانونية الأوروبية، بما في ذلك لائحة حماية البيانات العامة (GDPR) وشريعة الخدمات الرقمية (DSA) وشروط خدمة تيليجرام. تقتصر جميع المحتويات على مناقشات فنية مشروعة. يُحظر صراحة أي مادة غير قانونية أو سياسية أو عنيفة أو مُنكرة أو انتهك…
❤4
Signed 虚假 主页频道3.5港微
To the Channel's Entire Membership, Administrators, and Telegram Support Team: Dear Members — This space is an exclusive platform dedicated to EU-compliant technical exchanges. We are committed to upholding a pure technical discussion orientation in strict accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Digital Services Act (DSA), and Telegram's platform rules. The following are inviolable bottom line…
❤1
Signed 虚假/杂货铺
Dear channel administrators, members and Telegram team, This channel strictly prohibits the publication of any information that violates laws, regulations or Telegram policies in any region, including content related to politics, violence or infringement of the rights of others. Recently, we have noticed a large number of users maliciously inciting reports on this channel. Once verified, we will keep the complete ev…
❤1
Signed 虚假打广告号
⚠️ Channel Protection Tips | Jointly Maintain Community SafetyDear membersRecently, malicious reporting behavior has been discovered on some platforms. To protect channel security, please strictly follow the following rules:one ️⃣ Prohibit inciting speech: Do not post content related to politics, violence, hatred, and infringement, and prevent malicious whistleblowers from taking advantage of it; two ️⃣ Be wary …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @xjfdggpx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 791,027 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“虚假副频道” (@xjfdggpx), 680 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xjfdggpx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.