Photo, posted without a caption
❤1

Channel
@xixi023520
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
349subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004405802021 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xixi023520 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 21 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xixi023520 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 349 | +19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 330 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (21 August 2026 – 12 September 2026) |
| Views total | 10,180 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
今天刚体验完老师的课程,人照高度合一,说话非常随和很聊得来,服务好会尽量满足要求,服务质量也好,体验过程很有情绪价值如大姐姐一样照顾你,我反正是情绪上肉体上双倍享受😎,后面来重庆一定会再来哈,感谢老师
去过了 人照一致 服务也到位 有什么要求跟老师提就可以了 不过分的老师都能满足 中间还有按摩 值得一试
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
完成验证,人照7到8份像,态度好,口活好,服务完一直按摩放松,聊天也能聊,不敷衍,年龄30多也差不多准确,喜欢享受服务的可以来试试。
【验证留名】:leihan 【验证时间】:8.31 【出击老师】:@jxx023(九龙坡,茜茜 A6极品贵妇) 【所在地区】:九龙坡 【修车水费】:600 【人照相似】:10 【大约年龄】:30 【身高体重】:160/苗条 【凶器罩杯】:B+ 【服务态度】:热情、敬业 【体验过程】:一进门,就看到穿着性感的美女冲我微笑,小弟弟立即就微微一硬表示礼貌,然后猴急洗完澡,躺床上。老师很美很健谈,正准备和老师闲聊几句,结果老师一下子就含住小弟弟,一股莫名的舒软席卷全身,看着老师美丽的面庞认真的给小弟弟上课,我也很体贴的帮老师按摩大腿、腰部、胸部等,老师身材很棒,皮肤很好,又很配合,老师口的时候包裹感很强,弟弟慢慢进入云端,老师一路漫游,对我的咪咪头一顿输出,瞬间就舒服的想叫出来,老师继续在我身上认真上课,最后对着弟弟一阵强烈口技,让我欲罢不能,我实在受不了,于是提枪上阵,采用老汉推车,把玩老师的嫩细长腿,同时看着小弟弟在老师的嫩穴中进进…
❤1
山城x夜里的渴望 https://t.me/fyeick https://t.me/fyeick
有空哦
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 week
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @xixi023520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“茜茜的私密空间” (@xixi023520), 349 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xixi023520.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.