Channel
@xinwen8855
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
35subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002159441609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xinwen8855 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xinwen8855 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 35 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 36 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 36 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 31 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#泰媒称已找到失联的中国演员星星：💥目前人在缅甸，今日移交泰国 1月6日晚，泰国电视台在社交平台发布消息，称已经找到失联的演员星星，目前正在缅甸，安全无恙。 1月5日，演员 王星星 的女友嘉嘉利用社交账户“失眠爹地”在社交平台上发文求助，称男友星星（王星）赴泰国进组拍戏，于北京时间1月3日中午12时许在泰缅边境失联。 #消息 一出引发公众关注，相关词条登上微博热搜高位。 ps ：还得是上了热搜，不然不知道在哪个园区敲键盘，吃电棒了😂 #跑路 #寻人 #新闻 #东南亚 #迪拜 #灰产 #违法 #曝光 🏰官方招商：@pctop5555 🏰官方客服：@yili5777 🏰官方投诉：@yili5555 🆒 小小米专属 划水 吹皮
整治电信诈骗、优化旅游服务，泰国在行动⬇️ 泰国头条新闻社讯 1月4日，据泰媒报道，泰国总理府办公室发言人吉拉育表示，泰国总理佩通坦近日收到来自国家警察总署署长吉迪拉警上将的工作报告。报告指出，国家警察总署已引入先进数字技术和现代化设备，进一步加强公共安全保障，全面防范和应对新型犯罪活动。这一举措与政府紧急政策高度契合，尤其针对电信诈骗和网络犯罪问题，旨在提升执法效率和犯罪打击力度。 为强化游客安全，国家警察总署与泰国旅游警察局联合开发了名为“泰国旅游警察（Thailand Tourist Police）”的手机应用程序。该应用的主要功能包括： 1. 紧急求救（SOS）按钮：用户可通过该功能发送求助信息。 2. GPS定位系统：用户可共享实时位置，确保旅游警察快速定位并提供帮助。 当用户发出求助请求时，系统会将信息传递给辖区内所有执勤旅游警察，实现迅速响应和协助处理。此外，游客在遇到紧急情况时还可拨打旅游警察局紧急热线…
泰国警方大规模行动，捣毁多个窝点、查获大量豪车⬇️ 泰国头条新闻社讯 泰国科技犯罪调查厅近日开展了一次大规模行动，成功摧毁了臭名昭著的在线赌博网站“Macau888”背后的犯罪团伙。在曼谷和暖武里府多个地点展开突袭行动，成功捣毁了三个犯罪窝点。这次行动不仅展示了泰国政府打击网络犯罪的坚定决心，也向国际社会展现了泰国警方的高效与专业。 据泰国科技犯罪调查厅厅长透露，行动前警方进行了周密的情报收集和部署，确保了行动的顺利实施。在暖武里府巴革县Bang Phlap区Thanon Chaiyaphruek路上的“S-Car Import Car”公司，警方凭借暖武里府法院于1月3日发布的第5/2568号搜查令展开突袭，查扣了大量通讯设备、电子设备及计算机数据记录设备，并获取了与案件相关的重要证据。同时，现场还查获一辆兰博基尼Urus，这是一名在线赌博嫌疑人所使用的车辆。 此外，警方还在曼谷拉差普鲁路附近的一处豪宅内查获121辆豪车…
曝光！中国人在泰国不用1万元，就能培训做“警察”？！ 泰国头条新闻社讯 据泰媒报道，1月2日，泰国人民党曼谷市议员萨西南近日在推特上发文称，收到一名警务人员的举报，揭露一个针对中国籍人士的警察志愿者培训项目。根据举报，该项目每名学员需缴纳38,000泰铢的培训费。她对此表示质疑，泰国国家警察总署是否有权开展此类培训项目？同时她还对培训费用的归属、经费来源，以及是否合规使用警察徽章和国徽，发放证件等问题提出了疑问。 她的发文，迅速在网上引发网友热议。有网友表示疑惑：“这种操作真的合法合规吗？”而另一些网友透露，类似情况已存在多时，并建议相关部门前往芭堤雅进行深入调查。 为此，泰媒对曼谷京畿警察署署长西亚姆警中将进行了采访。他表示，已指示曼谷警察第三分局，对此事展开详尽调查。初步调查显示，确实存在这样一个培训项目，该项目由吞武里地区的一所大学发起，并邀请曼谷警察第三分局的警务人员担任讲师，共同参与警察志愿者的培训工作。 目前…
女子疑遭出租车司机下药抢劫并性侵，泰国警方介入全面调查 近日曼谷发生了一起恶性案件，一名女子在乘坐出租车后疑似遭到“下药”被迷晕、抢劫，并可能被性侵犯。案件引发社会对城市治安和非法迷药泛滥的严重关注。 而案件的关键在于，犯罪分子疑似通过迷药迷晕受害人后实施抢劫甚至性侵。Oil在事发前仅记得自己喝了几瓶啤酒，并上了一辆出租车，此后便失去意识。这一事实揭示了迷药泛滥的严重性。据调查，曼谷市内非法迷药的获取途径较为容易，即便是普通出租车司机也能通过黑市渠道买到这些致幻药物。 这一现象令人不寒而栗，迷药可能被滥用于抢劫、性侵等恶性犯罪，严重威胁居民和游客的安全。 #跑路 #寻人 #新闻 #东南亚 #迪拜 #灰产 #违法 #曝光 🏰官方招商：@pctop5555 🏰官方客服：@yili5777 🏰官方投诉：@yili5555 🆒 小小米专属 划水 吹皮
有中国公民在内！曼谷酒店失火致3死7伤 泰国头条新闻社讯 12月29日晚，曼谷考山路一家酒店五楼的511号房间发生火灾，事故导致3名外籍游客不幸身亡，另有7人受伤。接到报告后，紧急救援人员迅速行动，成功救出被困屋顶的36名客人。当时，酒店共有75名住客。 在此次火灾中，7名伤者的具体情况如下： 1.一名日本男子因吸入浓烟被送往医院。 2.一名外国女性昏迷后被送往医院，目前在重症监护室（CCU）接受治疗。 3.一名泰国男子因吸入烟雾接受现场急救，未送医院。 4.一名34岁的泰国男子因吸入烟雾被送往医院。 5.一名约34岁的德国男子因手部烧伤被送往医院。 6.一名约32岁的德国女性因从高处跳下导致腰部受伤，并因吸入烟雾被送往医院。 7.一名中国男子昏迷后被送往医院，目前在重症监护室（ICU）治疗。 火灾中，有3名外籍游客不幸遇难，具体情况如下： 1.一名外国女性因烧伤当场死亡，身份尚待确认。 2.一名外国男性昏迷后被送往医院抢…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @xinwen8855. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@xinwen8855 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“泰国曝光新闻” (@xinwen8855), 35 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinwen8855.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.