#机房 专业收割各大盘口,套路基本如出一辙。 前期厚款测试,放一包“鱼饵”建立信任;取得信任后,再诱导对方逐步上量、改为先款。第一次侥幸躲过,但往往躲不过第二次。 对方还会拿其他盘口的预付款、合作记录来增加可信度。等到预付阶段,我方提出减少测试条数,对方表面上仍在积极配合、不断安抚情绪,实际上已经再同步收割所有盘口。 总结:熟人下手最狠,信任让你放松警惕,贪心才是原罪。 骗子昵称:宝剑 一手机房 骗子ID号:8122526843 骗子账号:@baoj83847 诈骗金额:4141 骗子地址: TFuW6mSJdRjuDiVd35UUhz9R2oUxskqvSS ——————————————— 🔣🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔤🔠 💬 聊天/公群:@xinruijituan 🔔 曝光/投稿:@xiaomi77880 👍 便民/信息: 【新锐新闻】【信誉交易】【TG中文包】

Channel
新锐曝光
@xinruibaoguang
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,138subscribers
-282 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001366223530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xinruibaoguang |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xinruibaoguang |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 1,138 | -32 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 1,170 | -49 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 1,219 | -37 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:13 | 1,256 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 1,273 | -31 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 1,304 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 1,321 | -25 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 1,346 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 1,360 | -21 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 1,381 | -17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 1,398 | -22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 1,420 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 1,420 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 16 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
#机房 认识几年的机房朋友,听说刚出来,看到他有困难,出于信任提前预付了 3000U 想拉他一把。没想到之后却转头为其他盘口跑短信,期间满嘴谎话,如今更是直接失联。借此提醒各位同行:合作需谨慎,务必核实信誉,避免踩坑。 骗子昵称:好运 骗子ID号:7892350900 骗子账号:@haoyun88888888x 诈骗金额:3000 骗子地址:TKC7hwnkNB3AcyFvtn3BfmckViG8P49b8d ——————————————— 🔣🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔤🔠 💬 聊天/公群:@xinruijituan 🔔 曝光/投稿:@xiaomi77880 👍 便民/信息: 【新锐新闻】【信誉交易】【TG中文包】
大家注意点 106 通道 骗子 前面可以小包测试 测试没问题 上量 直接演都不演 直接杀,聊天记录还给清了,好几个盘口聊天记录可以帮我证明。 骗子昵称:本宫独尊—106(转账请语音确认) 骗子ID号:@duzun106 骗子账号:791365195 骗子昵称:本宫独尊【主】—106(转账请语音确认) 骗子ID号:@duzun1066 骗子账号:6970264924 诈骗金额:11634 USDT 骗子地址:TL7eGNbbREhkhAoJUcc3EGy7sPFCMYW7Dw 多次转账这些地址 :TKyEU7GNGtGkKvEmJuP9Hfr7xk3mUK5DDn TKg4zgXkuniLS4JcuFgFgRCf7aMF5iYsTQ TTyTVjUXtLXEYeZB168dSHM6aFxJNu6HKM TVVXoekapRhyjYFXqA2sVfpm2PcgHCDLJj TJD9GgQ8yam3GR4EQE8VvuwYD…
#106通道 假数据商和假机房一伙的,先是假数据商来套近乎然后主动推荐几个真实的机房,再真实的机房里面夹杂着自导自演的假机房,假机房冒充幻讯国际的团队,预付之后找各种借口拖延发送,要求退款直接已读不回玩消息。 经细查假数据商和假机房之间有交易,以及共同转账地址,间隔时间不久。 骗子昵称:梅花♣️ 幻讯国际 骗子ID号:8869757616 骗子账号:@meihua_huanxun 骗子昵称:星辰-幻讯国际 骗子ID号:8252477391 骗子账号:@huanxun_xinchen 骗子昵称:传奇耐电王 骗子ID号:8218006331 骗子账号:@anyconet 骗子昵称:中信银行 骗子ID号:8540844801 骗子账号:@Zhongo1 诈骗金额:4570 USDT 骗子地址:TDVyEE6vzbJcVmZGHsjGu4Wcp44dc9wWFr TVdJ6YQwDf9gDDmpyMtwsWMxZZCvxH…
#数据商 占用大家公共资源 清者自清 这种数据商也要出来跟学别人卖数据 也没什么几把格局 都跟她说撤包去 她也说OK 后面她就不行了 这种跟小唐人没什么区别 大脑裹小脑的 吃饱开始打厨子了 卖点数据卖出优越感了 骗子昵称:糕冷 骗子ID号:1314819030 骗子账号:@gaoleng886 诈骗金额:无 骗子地址:无 ——————————————— 🔣🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔤🔠 💬 聊天/公群:@xinruijituan 🔔 曝光/投稿:@xiaomi77880 👍 便民/信息: 【新锐新闻】【信誉交易】【TG中文包】
#盘口 跑路狗直接双清记录 @acai6677 @sjsj773737 @helIo220220 @xh33466 尼玛的死全家台子 169.top 配合中介狗验证台子,跑路机房搞数据 中介跑路后 验证过台子的id已注销账户 1.13晚上 @acai6677 叫阿财的联系过来拉了 @sjsj773737 跟 @helIo220220 建了群 验证了 169.top 台子 第二天跑了一包后直接 群删除 ,实际上给我发的是另一个台子,联系了实际跑的盘口证实对接人的是叫 @xh33466 西胡对接并已结算给地址TUAZjYYZNPM4nxRB4n4ajKUGUpptqDGgV3 跟这个地址合作盘口得留意此地址,同行们有补充的补上,别让这种害群之狗影响卡发的环境 万把条的短信送你们买棺材了大过年的 还有帮忙验证台子的盘口你们不倒 更待何时😁 骗子昵称:阿财 | 如意吉祥 | 西胡 骗子ID号:7227255423 |…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @xinruibaoguang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@xinruibaoguang named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新锐曝光” (@xinruibaoguang), 1,138 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinruibaoguang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.