Channel
@xiixchao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
61subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004490779250 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiixchao |
| Description | 思思频道t.me/xiixchao 联系老师：@siisxi |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiixchao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 61 | no change |
| 29 Sept 2026, 21:47 | 61 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 17 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (17 September 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,152 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎰 上海桃桃折扣券 📮 参与条件： 🌏️ 归属地 上海 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-桃桃🍑的私密世界(宝山） 🎫 加入-野寻·上海学生交流群 └ 🔑 发送口令﹝欢迎桃桃﹞ 🎫 加入-野寻·上海打卡通告群 🎫 加入-野寻·上海修车档案 ❗ 口令提示： 请先参与抽奖，再发送口令激活 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 桃桃200立减券 现价600 × 3 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 中奖后请24小时内联系桃桃兑奖（ @siisxi ），无出击意向不要参与 在3天内完成报告向 @chaseshxc_bot 🔋 人品加成：⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年10月01日 13时00分00秒
❤1
Channel name was changed to «桃桃🍑的私密世界(宝山）»
现在有🈳宝贝们😘😘😘 地铁方便 好停车
中秋节快乐宝子们
♡ 星野严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-09-24 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：思思 👨🏻💻 留名：DeandraMall 💌 服务过程 ： 看思思老师的频道觉得很漂亮，中了工来的。遥控到达gsz，还是头课，进门ls颜值真的不错，虽然和频道里稍微有点不一样，但一样好看。身体稍微有点丰满，黄皮偏白，皮肤超好，滑嫩。 果断交了水费，一起yyy，ls的🐻竟然是D，真的没想到，还软软的，抱着舌吻也好舒服。 洗完先在床上温存一会儿，然后69，下面呀很嫩，而且ls也很敏感。 戴t上阵，通道包裹感强，温温润润的，抱着ls来cjs，超级舒服。最后换后入，123出货，洗个澡再聊会儿天，满意离开工作室。 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasesh_lsda/3467
❤1
还有🈳位宝贝们 😘 想与你有一个难忘的邂逅～☺️
🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号：H178964257906 🎰 上海思思半价券 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 中奖后请24小时内联系思思老师（@siisxi ），在3天内完成报告向 @chaseshxc_bot 💁 参与情况：55达标 / 56报名 🔋 人品加成：59票 ⚡️× 9 🎅 联系领奖：野寻·星野 1. Deandra Mall⚡️× 9 奖品：宝山思思半价 祝大家心想事成好运连连！
开课了宝贝们😘😘😘
开课了宝贝们，提前预约，空位不多了😘
哥哥提前和你们说一下今天课满了不要跑空了只能约明天的了
♡ 星野严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-09-19 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：思思 👨🏻💻 留名：匿名 💌 服务过程 ： 老师非常配合，态度也很好，聊天的时候也非常愉快，也不会催课，还一直在夸我，该有的服务一点不少，必须好评。 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasesh_lsda/3467
♡ 星野严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-09-18 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：思思 👨🏻💻 留名：匿名 💌 服务过程 ： 鸡鸡好痒呀 出击！ 小区环境不错 很安全 遥控上楼 见到老师 有点微微丰满 但肯定不胖 人长得不错 尤其态度很好 全程不冷场 可惜我只是个害羞的小处男 服务方面一流 还能🐍能69 下面粉嫩无异味 好吃🥵 过程中不停娇喘 情绪价值拉满 问了问还能口爆 可惜我口爆没出货😭最后又带上套套冲刺出水 舒坦 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasesh_lsda/3467
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @xiixchao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“桃桃🍑的私密世界(宝山）” (@xiixchao), 61 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiixchao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.