Channel
@xigang361
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
137subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001612193905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xigang361 |
| Created | 7 December 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xigang361 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 137 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 137 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
37 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 83.8% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 16.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2023 to 25 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
当地时间8月24日，社交媒体“电报”（Telegram）创始人帕维尔·杜罗夫在法国被捕。 法国TF1电视台报道称，帕维尔·杜罗夫可能面临恐怖主义、洗钱和贩毒的指控。俄罗斯国家杜马副主席达万科夫25日凌晨呼吁俄罗斯外交部设法解救杜罗夫，他表示已经向俄罗斯外交部长拉夫罗夫发出了相应的请求。俄罗斯外交部表示，俄罗斯驻法国大使馆已经采取了必要措施，以了解帕维尔·杜罗夫的有关情况。帕维尔·杜罗夫1984年出生，媒体称他同时具有俄罗斯、法国、阿联酋等多国国籍。有报道称，由于帕维尔·杜罗夫是法国公民，因此不会被交换或引渡至其他国家。帕维尔·杜罗夫所创建的社交媒体“电报”（Telegram）是目前俄罗斯媒体和俄语用户所使用的最主要社交平台之一。
❤6👍3
加强打击电诈！西港突查涉诈涉赌大楼 据柬媒消息，8月12日下午，内政部国务秘书宋波在西港召开会议，就加强打击电信诈骗和网赌等问题进行交流。 西港省长蒙西那、国家警察总署副总监兼西港省警察局长苏洛塔、国家警察总署副总监，负责打击商业赌博犯罪工作组韩速万上将等出席会议。 会后，工作组还实地突查疑似涉嫌网赌和电信诈骗的大楼。
❤3
https://t.me/gongxin
西港警方破获58公斤毒品案 一名中国籍嫌犯被捕 西港警方侦破特大毒品走私案，缴获毒品58公斤，一名中国籍嫌犯被捕。 据警方报告，嫌犯为PENG XIONGFENG（33岁），来自中国湖南省。 警方报告指出，5月10日，警方突查位于西哈努克市一号分区一家酒店时，现场抓捕中国男子，查获毒品58公斤毒品和一把手枪。案情重大，省长都到场了！ 有柬媒报道称，此案最初是因为本地人在嫌疑人的车辆内发现了枪支，在报警后，警方顺藤摸瓜最终破获此案。
❤8👍3
#劝返 关于敦促安福籍非法滞留境外人员限期回国的通告 为坚决贯彻落实党中央决策部署，严厉打击治理电信网络诈骗违法犯罪活动，维护社会治安稳定，保护人民群众生命财产安全，依法打击跨境违法犯罪行为，根据《中华人民共和国刑法》《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》《中华人民共和国出境入境管理法》《中华人民共和国反电信网络诈骗法》等有关法律规定，现对14名非法滞留境外的安福籍人员予以通告，具体如下发布下： 本通告发布后，非法滞留境外人员限期在2024年5月31日前主动回国，并在入境前7日内向户籍所在地公安机关报备。非法滞留境外人员家属及亲友应积极配合劝返，敦促非法滞留境外人员回国或投案自首，对涉案人员主动投案、如实供述自己违法犯罪行为的，可以依法从轻或者减轻处罚；犯罪情节较轻的，可以依法免除处罚。对一意孤行、拒不回国或投案自首的，公安机关将依法打击处理，并依法采取惩戒措施。本通告自发布之日起实行。 安福县打击…
❤3
#新规！入境中国或将被检查手机等电子设备‼️‼️ 中国国家安全部4月26日公布《国家安全机关行政执法程序规定》和《国家安全机关办理刑事案件程序规定》，这是国家安全部首次公布执法办案程序的规定，将于今年7月1日起施行。 其中提到，当地执法人员将被赋予检查电子设备的权利，届时到访中国的游客或会被当地执法人员检查智能手机或电脑。 紧急情况下，确有必要立即查验的，经设区的市级以上国家安全机关负责人批准，执法人员经出示人民警察证或者侦察证，可以当场实施查验。 ps:把自己的老百姓当贼防，民主国家敢这么搞？他们到底害怕什么？😐😐 ➖➖➖赞助广告➖➖➖ 项目众包 @zhongbao Telegram所有赚钱项目就在这一个频道 公信担保 @gongxin 诚于信，担于行；服于公，保于众！ 华人日报 @huarenribao 聚焦全球华人新闻 海天盛筵 @haitianshengyan 长期招聘外围，可兼职或全职 海外求职招聘就上猎聘 @…
❤5
一个在柬埔寨的越南仔爆料 我是越南籍潮汕人 要举报一些中国人在柬埔寨特别是是做诈骗回不了国了现在就是针对越南人的钱和买卖越南人，包谷按照中国诈骗大陆模式像缅甸这些园区。 走到我的朋友被绑架了找不到人都是中国网头背后，很多人人开了一个集团房地产公司，其实背后都和一些网投园区有关系，我知道的这伙人就是专门骗越南籍华人到柬埔寨。 凯博集团真正的老大就是叫一个老健整个中国城园区这里不输缅甸那边。以前做中国也死很多人。现在越南我们被死不知道上多少。 这个凯博园区算法律来说台湾刚被上网拍视频虽然是违法，可是也是有真实，在这个园区老板是福建 浙江。 现在因为针对中国的比较难做了就开始对越南的下手了，越南也是很可怜的，前段时间柬埔寨某园区一越南人跳楼视频一些都见过，就是被这些园区公司老板逼的走投无路才会选择跳楼。希望有关部门重视起来。早日铲除黑恶势力。 ➖➖➖赞助广告➖➖➖ 项目众包 @zhongbao Telegram所有赚钱项目就…
❤2
西港诈骗园区 又一名中国盘总惨死！ #网友爆料：昨天晚上（3月31日）西港海豚湾下面的永望（诈骗园区）内一名中国男子惨死！！！ 据知情人透露死者是东北人，今年三十岁左右，朋友都叫他大雄或者雄哥，生前是做一个印度诈骗盘口的代理，这家诈骗公司主要是做印度股票诈骗盘，公司规模很大，主要是针对印度人进行诈骗。 知情人说，大雄在西港混很多年了，平时为人比较仗义，性格比较豪爽，很喜欢结交朋友，跟圈里人一直相处的很融洽，没听说他在西港得罪过什么人，也没听说他最近与何人结怨，他孩子还小，老婆在西港的家里带孩子，他出事惨死，不知道他老婆孩子未来的日子怎么过。 据死者身边人讲诉，昨天晚上一个叫su哥的人叫大雄去诈骗园区谈事情，然后大雄带着兄弟就过去了，到了诈骗园区的办公室后，跟一群人开始喝酒，期间他家人还给他打了视频电话，问他什么时候回家，他跟家人说忙完就回去了。当时办公室里有七八个人一起喝酒，然后喝完酒后在下楼梯的时候被摔死了......…
❤2
警方共在西港新云顶园区抓捕804人，其中包括约600名中国人 西港这两天冲园区，本地媒体是完全不知道，我看到有西港本地媒体记者还在一脸懵逼到处打听消息。 这次行动为什么没有通知或者说本地媒体没有知道消息，主要原因我推测有如下： 一、园区地点太偏僻了，远离西港市区，闹出点动静也很难传出来； 二、打击行动仍在继续进行，或许到收官之时，官方才会召集记者再搞个发布会； 三、这次冲的园区中，有土地和物业据说是DPM级别官员的，可能官人打了招呼，冲归冲，但尽量低调点，别闹的满城风雨，把这些人收拾了，还得招商割下茬儿韭菜呢。 四、再补充一点：尽量低调一点冲，以免引起西港整个社会面恐慌，这样对于西港经济而言是不利的。
❤1
中国投资者遭地主强行收楼？西港省政府通报详情！ 据柬埔寨头条报道：3月20日，西港一处由中国人投资的大楼被查抄的消息在网络上传播，有投资者在华人群里称“老邱东升酒店被地主警察法院抄家了，设备被全部搬走，监控被拔，跪求各位兄弟姐妹拍照片或视频作为证据。” 据悉，该名中国投资者邱某与本地房东的土地纠纷案已持续多年。上述消息发布后，一时间，“中国投资者遭地主强行收楼”的消息疯传，引起投资者热议。随后，西哈努克省政府发布了关于该处建筑物投资租赁纠纷案的通告。 西港省政府通报投资租赁纠纷案详情 西港政府通告指出，这起纠纷案的租客是中国人，房东为柬埔寨人，在省政府的协调下，租客拒绝调解，最终法院决定执行判决书。 西港政府通告指出，这起纠纷案的租客是中国人，房东为柬埔寨人，在省政府的协调下，租客拒绝调解，最终法院决定执行判决书。 详情如下： 2018年，邱某在柬埔寨房东金荷那里租赁了一块土地，并于2018年6月10日签署租赁合同，租金…
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @xigang361. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@xigang361 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西港TV|西港大事件|华人日报|安危事件|头条新闻|灰产新闻|灰产日报” (@xigang361), 137 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xigang361.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.