Channel
@xiaoyu8494
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
834subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002742520652 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaoyu8494 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaoyu8494 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 834 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 839 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 839 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 June 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 9,061 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号：H178470716579 🎰 浦东区颜值嫩妹小玉福利抽奖 @xiaoyu8756 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 🎁 创建抽奖·设置抽奖说明（非必填） 当前抽奖说明：禁止恶意水群。 禁止刷屏。 禁止军团参与抽奖。 禁止不写报告。 中奖者多次无故不去，取消所有资格，并清退出群，不去就不要参与抽奖。 希望兄弟们多多推介老师上榜，切记精品老师 👉 请输入抽奖说明文案: 💁 参与人数：139人 🔋 人品加成：9票 ⚡️× 9 🎅 联系领奖：@xiaoyu8756 1. lumen kai 奖品：1p五折优惠劵 祝大家心想事成好运连连！
开课中可预约
呃，不高冷🙂
【时间】：2026-07-23 【老师】：小钰 【评价人】：cc29重生版 【颜值评分】：9 【人照评分】：9 【身材评分】：9.9 【科室环境】：9 【服务评分】：9 【态度评分】：9 【出击金额】：1p 【推荐指数】：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 【约课记录】： 【服务过程】老师挺早之前就想打卡 看到开课了就约了时间前往 科室略偏 不过安全 但不怎么隔音 开车前往是最好的选择 停车位多多。小钰人罩一致 黄皮偏白 身材非常的哇塞 前凸后翘 乳头粉粉的 观感非常的不错 。有前后陪浴 不用自己动手 上床之后开始正常的的嫩妹三件套 还挺不错 戴套cjs开始 低声的呻吟很带感 捂着自己的脸也让我感觉异常兴奋 不一会有感觉 马上让小钰试试女上 果不其然 很会动阿 没几下就出货了😂的确是美滋滋 结束之后帮忙洗澡 穿衣服走人了。 老师挺好的 就是偏冷 如果能热情一点体验感会更好。
❤1
可以提前预约明天的课啦🙂
欧美新妆容，通知一下，在我群里或者频道里面的，来上过课宝，今天200优惠卷，只限今天和老客！！！！！
❤1
小钰的频道 pinned a photo
🎰 浦东区颜值嫩妹小玉福利抽奖 @xiaoyu8756 📮 参与条件： 🎫 加入-vpn销售维护售后 🎫 加入-小钰的频道 🎫 加入-上海老师开课自助广告轮播群 🎫 加入-上海集团（疯狂星期四）恶意水群直接踢 🎫 加入-上海公开榜 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 1p五折优惠劵 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 🎁 创建抽奖·设置抽奖说明（非必填） 当前抽奖说明：禁止恶意水群。 禁止刷屏。 禁止军团参与抽奖。 禁止不写报告。 中奖者多次无故不去，取消所有资格，并清退出群，不去就不要参与抽奖。 希望兄弟们多多推介老师上榜，切记精品老师 👉 请输入抽奖说明文案: 🔋 人品加成：⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年07月25日 20时00分00秒
❤1
谢谢宝宝的好评
💃艺名：小钰 ✈️资料：https://t.me/shxyls/27729 ⛳️位置: #浦东新区 🙍♂️学生：上岸版 ———————————————— 老师颜值:10身材我这里是满分肤色没那么白，老师工作室再小区里面的，昨天约了一个夜课，以为又是那种照片差距很大，进去一看标准网红脸是我喜欢的类型，没有白等那么久，进门给我递拖鞋给我水细节这方面没得说，然后就交水费，本来就心急水都没有来得及喝，就要求妹妹给我洗澡！脱了衣服这些发现小钰身上有肉的地方是真的顶，细细的把玩了一下，洗的时候要求妹妹给我口，看着妹妹缓缓蹲下去开始吞吐的时候简直爽翻无齿感会吸不痛，完事没有控制住出了一次，洗完以后上床又开始，服务这方面有点欠缺，无非就是嫩妹三件套，但是我喜欢这种无所谓，后入小钰屁股看着很大，视觉冲击到底，持续了10来分钟到底了，完事以后陪着小钰聊天吹牛，总体来说这个老师真的很顶，吃颜值的首选小钰老师，会回锅，早上醒来小钰老师已经把早餐买…
开课啦！今天天气很好，可预约给位宝！
https://t.me/jiangnanlu1/16407?single
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xiaoyu8494. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 941,598 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小钰的频道” (@xiaoyu8494), 834 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoyu8494.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.