Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小敏丝足抓龙筋

Channel

小敏丝足抓龙筋

@xiaoyangzlj66

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

740subscribers

+733 since we began measuring on 16 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004368029990
TypeChannel
Username@xiaoyangzlj66
Created9 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded16 October 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiaoyangzlj66

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7740373.516 October 2026 — 7 subscribers16 October 2026 — 519 subscribers23 October 2026 — 620 subscribers30 October 2026 — 699 subscribers6 November 2026 — 740 subscribers16 October 20266 November 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +733. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 09:25740+41
30 Oct 2026, 11:06699+79
23 Oct 2026, 02:36620+101
16 Oct 2026, 13:06519+512
16 Oct 2026, 05:227first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 9 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.41%
avg views ÷ 740 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held6 (9 October 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total120
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Oct 2026, 05:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

16 Oct 2026, 03:53 UTC41 viewsread 16 October 2026
Photo

小雪老师 资深抓筋培训导师,国内前高女王🌟 sm经验丰富,新加坡明星抓筋老师🌟

13 Oct 2026, 13:59 UTC37 viewsread 16 October 2026
Photo

好多性感变装 等你来选择✔️ 御姐💖 古风💖 女仆 💖媚御

9 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC36 viewsread 16 October 2026
Photo

【什么是抓龙筋?】 泰国抓龙筋以前是皇室才能享受的项目,后来传到了民间,只要体验过-次,就会有明显的舒适感。在现在的泰国街头,有很多泰国抓龙筋的店铺。而且很受当地人的欢迎。是泰国除了马杀鸡第二受欢迎的一个理项目,很多人体验都是因为好奇,体验后才发现还有这种独特神奇的手法,按摩后使人气舒血畅、精力旺盛,心情愉悦,让男人提高战斗力! 【为什么选择我们?】 因为我们姐妹是国内为数不多的专业理疗级抓龙筋,持证上岗,专门去泰国学习的抓龙筋手法。现在市面上太多打着抓龙筋的名号做着普通的92项目的店,都是挂羊头卖狗肉,只要体验过我们姐妹的抓龙筋手法,您就会知道差别在哪里了。 【关于价格】 这是抓龙筋项目争议最大的一个地方,大部分人都会把抓龙筋和普通的92打飞机项目混为一谈,导致觉得抓龙筋价格高。实际上这两个项目的区别是非常大的,抓龙筋的本质是理疗项目,整个流程科学严谨,是对男性功能的一种保养和治疗。而我们姐妹的手法是针对国内客户进行了…

9 Oct 2026, 06:20 UTC34 viewsread 16 October 2026

小样老师 资深抓筋培训导师,国内前高女王🌟 丝足经验丰富,明星抓筋老师🌟

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @xiaoyangzlj66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小敏丝足抓龙筋” (@xiaoyangzlj66), 740 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoyangzlj66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.