Channel
@xiaovein
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+50 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002402179123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaovein |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaovein |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 136 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 141 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:35 | 135 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 128 | +10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 118 | +29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:41 | 89 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 86 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
220 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 57 | 25.9% | |
| custom 5247121477773326074 | 38 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5194905782239389810 | 33 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5194953048354485016 | 24 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5246869504926974329 | 23 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5247074404931761557 | 23 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5247176242901318209 | 20 | 9.09% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.909% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ㅤㅤ ㅤꪔ ꪔ • + . ˙ — джейсяо, сяофей, сяовейны, а как же сяочени? — я так люблю сяоченей, хочу больше контента с ними!!! да? ㅤㅤ ˗ˏˋ ˎˊ˗ ТОГДА ТЕБЕ СЮДА ㅤㅤ ㅤ 𝐗𝐈𝐀𝐎𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐍 | daily × cf ˗ ˏˋ ˎˊ˗ mp | rt | tags, bot, adm ㅤㅤ ㅤꪔ ꪔ • + . ˙
❤🔥1💋1
Signed Крази Диамонд
— я так люблю Ли Тяньченя и Ли тяньси из агентов времени, но по ним слишком мало контента!! если у тебя такая же проблема, то ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ДОБРО 𐌿ОЖАЛОВАТЬ в ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 𝐋𝐢 𝐓𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐧 𝐋𝐢 𝐓𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐱𝐢 𝐝𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 + CF !! cr on X
Signed Крази Диамонд
Дорогие СяоВейн энджоеры, у нас для вас две крутые новости !🌟🌟 Макино вступает в ряды админов, а также с завтрашнего дня мы переходим в дейли формат! Обязательно подписывайтесь и не пропускайте свежие артики🌟
💋12❤🔥1
Signed Крази Диамонд
✨ давно нуждаешься в дейли по чэн сяоши из "агентов времени"? тогда добро пожаловать в наш скромный уголок . . . 🌟🌟
Signed Крази Диамонд
🌟:: Интересно, что меня ждёт сегодня??? 🌟:: Не верю в гороскопы, но прикольно будет посмотреть 🌟:: Хочу больше каналов, связанных с тематикой «Link click»! Знакомо? 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ⬜⬜🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤 🌟🌟🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🌟🌟 ⬜⬜🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
Signed Крази Диамонд
New #Take ! ! Cr ~ неанон Макино * {🔗🫶🔗} #XiaoVein #art
custom 52470744049317615575custom 52468695049269743294custom 52471214777733260743💋2custom 52471762429013182091
Signed Крази Диамонд
New #Take ! ! Cr ~ неанон Макино * {🔗🫶🔗} #XiaoVein #art
custom 52470744049317615576custom 52471214777733260744custom 52468695049269743292
Signed Крази Диамонд
New #Take ! ! Cr ~ неанон Макино * Спасибо, Макино, что ведёшь сяовейн нон дейли {🔗🫶🔗} #XiaoVein #art
custom 524686950492697432913custom 52470744049317615576custom 52471214777733260745💋2
Signed Крази Диамонд
New #Take ! ! Cr ~ неанон Макино * {🔗🫶🔗} #XiaoVein #art
custom 52470744049317615576custom 52468695049269743294💋3
Signed Крази Диамонд
! Cr ~ jimodejiemo on lofter * {🔗🫶🔗} #XiaoVein #art
custom 52471214777733260748custom 51949057822393898103custom 52471762429013182093
Signed Крази Диамонд
! Cr ~ ye52560245 on lofter * {🔗🫶🔗} #XiaoVein #art
custom 51949057822393898104💋3custom 51949530483544850162custom 52471762429013182092
Signed Крази Диамонд
New #Take ! ! Cr ~ неанон Макино * {🔗🫶🔗} #XiaoVein #art
custom 51949057822393898104custom 52471762429013182093💋2custom 52471214777733260742
Signed Крази Диамонд
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xiaovein. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XiaoVein daily | cf” (@xiaovein), 136 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaovein.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.