Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小甜心的后宫❤️

Channel

小甜心的后宫❤️

@xiaotianxin123

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

716subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003713291659
TypeChannel
Username@xiaotianxin123
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiaotianxin123

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

68671670131 August 2026 — 686 subscribers1 September 2026 — 688 subscribers10 September 2026 — 705 subscribers17 September 2026 — 716 subscribers31 August 202617 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 682–721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:01716+11
10 Sept 2026, 13:39705+17
1 Sept 2026, 10:12688+2
31 Aug 2026, 10:15686first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.0%
avg views ÷ 716 subscribers
Avg views / post
337
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.202%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held14 (7 August 202631 August 2026)
Views total2,694
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
888.9%
🔥111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC125 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

【老师名字】:小甜心 【学生名字】:匿名 【出击描述】:已经关注小甜心老师很久了,一直都没有机会来沈阳,借着出差终于有机会约到了小甜心老师,超级激动。 本人钢铁直男一枚,无意间刷到小甜心老师,看到兄弟们给了超多的好评,我从来没了解过男娘,本着好奇的心理,默默关注小甜心老师很久,加上本人不在沈阳,一直都没找到合适的机会约甜心老师。这次出差来沈阳,终于鼓起勇气约到了小甜心老师🥳 老师人超级好超级温柔,见面后被惊艳到了~好漂亮~看老师的朋友圈一直没有露脸的,我还以为不会特别好看,但是真正见到了之后直接被惊艳到了~老师真的很漂亮,说话声音和女孩子一样,重点是老师的皮肤~真的超级超级好,又白又滑又嫩,软软的~我敢说比绝大多数女孩子的皮肤都好!见面后老师直接被老师强制🐍稳~老师舌头软软的!超级有感觉,接着就是床上的工作了~因为我是第一次接触这种~本以为会有点抵触心理,但是见到小甜心老师的一瞬间就消除了大半!过程中小甜心老师很耐心的引导我,就

30 Aug 2026, 00:42 UTC213 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

【老师名字】:小甜心 【学生名字】:匿名 【出击描述】:来沈阳探亲,肯定要体验沈阳必吃榜非“小甜心”,提前做好攻略联系了老师,见面之后没有任何不适感,身上香香软软的,亲起来很舒服,老师的小豆豆很敏感,一舔就会浪叫,口活绝对一绝,一进嘴我的肉棒就不受控的棒棒硬,光是这一块就值回课费,值得一探,真整挺好袄!

27 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC463 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

哥哥 我吃的好么~ 🫦👅🥛 #cd #ts #cd小甜心 #沈阳资源

27 Aug 2026, 01:39 UTC444 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

【老师名字】:小甜心 【学生名字】:匿名 【出击描述】:直男必经的成长一可以,一定要来!只会更硬!换上了我带的波点小丝袜,搭配好利来小工装,包性感的!下次来沈还要cj小甜心mm!

26 Aug 2026, 00:49 UTC495 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

【老师名字】:小甜心 【学生名字】:匿名 【出击描述】:百闻不如一见,见了真tm带劲,zn大学生破处,对男娘有一点了解,但从没敢体验,最近想破处,约了两个女老师一个鸽子一个没时间,索性直接约了小甜心老师,这里要跟甜心老师说抱歉确实是候补临时找她的。不过也正因如此才有美好的体验,应了我开头说的那句,平时看好评只是过眼瘾,只有真正摸到手,肏到了才算真的领略到什么是骚屄,老师非常主动,呻吟的声音像极了饥渴小妹,不由得感慨平时怎么保养的皮肤能如此好,无死角的好摸,一改床上的单一,老师把我带到浴缸里,一边放水一边湿身,在水里含着我的肉棒,水珠滑落在她的白肌上太美了,后入的时候水的拍打声和撞击声融入一起,小甜心双手扶着浴缸边缘跪在水里被我桩着,空荡的浴室显得呻吟声尤其刺激,小处男首次以几分钟被甜心姐姐直接拿下,休息一会回到床上聊会天,开始了第二次战斗,第二次有经验了时间也长了,正面出击看着仙女棒也没觉得多尴尬,反正肏的小甜心脸和脖子红红的,

1

26 Aug 2026, 00:48 UTC449 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

【老师名字】:小甜心 【学生名字】:匿名 【出击描述】:老司机第一次体验男娘,完全跟女的两种感觉,太不一样了,加倍刺激,小甜心的腿怎么能这么白,皮肤好到不可思议,触感完爆名媛,说不上来的感觉,初次肯定是有点紧张的,但是好在ls有耐心一点点引导,主要是太会引导了,刚进屋就给我裤子拔了顺着肚脐就给我舔,舔到内裤主动把头埋进去用力吸,然后舌头顺着内裤边缘就探进去含住🐢头,这一般人也受不了啊,还比较配合适应各种角色,接受度也很高,怎么玩都有耐心,骚的一批,抱着老师的腿就想舔,发自内心的觉得这比很多女老师让人上头,爱不释手,一定要体验后入!一定一定一定要体验后入!大屁股滑亮白嫩,一拍就红,越拍叫的越浪,极品! 男娘没吃过药整过容能做到这种我觉得够用了,当然脸肯定不是极美的 但不丑!对得起这个价格!

26 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC436 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

【老师名字】:小甜心 【学生名字】:匿名 【出击描述】:关注很久 这次回国终于体验到小甜心了 不说过程 只说感受: 甜甜的 香香的 软软的 糯糯的 高高的 白白的 美美的 温柔热烈的感觉 真是捡到宝了! 这一炮够我回去惦记一年了!再回国还要和甜心翻云覆雨! 包满意的!推荐!😘😘

22 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC669 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

哥哥说紫色很有韵味💜 #cd #ts #小甜心

🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC747 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

【老师名字】:小甜心 【学生名字】:匿名 【出击描述】:好兄弟来沈阳玩过之后推荐给我,刚好路过沈阳就约了小甜心老师,第一次体验男娘,可能是我之前吃的太好了所以要求高一些,她的外在肯定是达不到高端外围的标准,但是在一般的女老师里算拔尖了,皮肤真的很好,之前也接触过几个男娘整容也挺好看但是都没甜心纯自然的看起来舒服,老师性格很好,温温柔柔的,聊起天还很有趣,见面没有尴尬,亲吻什么的也都挺舒服的,口活真不错比我媳妇口的好,然后抱着她进浴缸里开始后入活塞运动,灯光照在她的大白屁股上,真带劲,没几下就被秒,实在惭愧,休息一会和老师唠唠家常腻歪了一下,又被撩拨支起杆了,于是又在浴缸里提枪上马,最后看着甜心跪着求饶,让我打她的屁股放过她,我才心满意足的一股股射给她。满分💯以后来沈阳还会到她这战一发!也推荐给更多的哥们儿来一探究竟。

3

17 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC778 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

【老师名字】:小甜心 【学生名字】:匿名 【出击描述】:来沈阳出差,体验垂涎已久的小甜心,每次都是看评价看硬,这次终于有机会爽到,见面了我的第一眼就爱上了,真的很漂亮,淡妆都是很美的,无整容无过多修饰,天然的美,皮肤细腻光滑的程度堪比润玉,触感很好,轻吻嘴唇很软,舌头进入交织在一起感觉真的是不一样,仙女棒也不影响观感,全身无毛,嫩穴也是摸起来软软嫩嫩的,顶进去的那一刻无法用语言形容,操起来双手托着她的小蛮腰,撞击起来的翘臀一下一下弹起来的样子,配上迷离的眼神,伸出的舌头,淫荡的呻吟,爽到顶!不虚此行!下次来沈阳还要体验!

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @xiaotianxin123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小甜心的后宫❤️” (@xiaotianxin123), 716 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaotianxin123.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.