有空可预约
Signed 图一

Channel
@xiaoshuixiaobaikunmi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,517subscribers
+422 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003970787833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaoshuixiaobaikunmi |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 5 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaoshuixiaobaikunmi |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 2,517 | +107 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 2,410 | +87 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 2,323 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:35 | 2,322 | +21 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 2,301 | +24 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 2,277 | +21 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 2,256 | +27 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 2,229 | +22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 2,207 | +36 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 2,171 | +59 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 2,112 | +17 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 2,095 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 94.7% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
有空可预约
Signed 图一
@hztt5202 我喜欢高的 !喜欢大长腿 !一进门看见图一老师,我就知道没白来,漂亮的脸蛋和大长长长腿,我都不知道我眼睛该看哪里,靠近我的时候有一种淡淡的木香,特别好闻。课室特别好找,高档私密,我还没走近,门卫就帮我把门开好了,小区环境好,图一老师的闺房特别干净,一看就是爱干净爱卫生的好宝宝。床前有一面超大镜子,特别爱,看着镜子里的大长腿我都受不了。舌头特别软,特别会口。特别好特别好特别好!无脑冲!没有缺点!图一老师yyds!! 标签: @hztt5202 #图一 2000p #普陀 点击跳转原始报告【需先加群】 反馈狼友: HeeJou 时间:2026-08-11 14:16:53 报告ID:16858 当前进度:1/8
Signed 图一
老师:图一 @hztt5202 评分:10.0分 评价:图一老师,我直接给到一个字:夯!夯爆了,直接闭眼冲就行!课室超级干净温馨,有种家有贤妻的感觉。床前有一面大镜子,可以直接看到超绝大长腿和忽闪忽闪的卡姿兰大眼睛,简直就是夯爆了!!有种帝王般的感受,理解了从此君王不早朝。我不怎么写评价,我说的都是大白话,反正话糙理不糙,都是百分百真实的体验感受!性格也很好,刚开始第一眼感觉有一点高冷,恰好她养的小狗狗足够热情,后面就发现图一特别好相处,很活泼,很温柔,声音也很好听的,很贴心,情商高。太多优点了,我不知道怎么说了,反正就是夯爆了。 反馈人:一只老Tom呀 魔都探花男群:https://t.me/+mhw016G0xDo0ZWI1
Signed 图一
今日份上线 可预约
Signed 图一
匿名报告 @hztt5202 一推门见到图一老师,感觉心脏砰砰跳,很心动。课室很干净清香,图一老师贴心的帮我拿一次性拖鞋给我换上,身上的香味若隐若现,非常好闻。口活非常非常好,舌头非常非常软,像踏入云端之境般美妙。身体很柔软,配合度非常高,皮肤滑滑嫩嫩的,混血小蛋糕一枚。小区非常高档,特别好。可以夸奖的地方太多了,总之就是非常完美的一次课程!!! 标签: @hztt5202 #图一 2000p #普陀 点击跳转原始报告【需先加群】 反馈狼友: 匿名狼友 时间:2026-08-05 21:43:40 报告ID:16522 当前进度:1/6
❤1
Signed 图一
我有个秘密想要嘴对嘴告诉你哦
❤1
Signed 图一
老师艺名:#图一 lsid:@hztt5202 上课费用: 2000p 上课时间: 2026.07 之前约课一波三折一直没能成行,这次老师回归速速约好课,新小区,很好找,老师给的指引清晰。 一进门,老师踩着恨天高出现在面前,一身连衣裙笑脸相迎的将我揽入怀抱,轻声细语问道,哥哥要喝水么,那声音瞬间让人酥酥麻麻,不觉间小头指挥大头,已经率先起立。近脸神似封神榜妲己演员娜然,五官更为深邃,寒暄过后拉我进入闺房,我环顾四周房间整洁干净,指挥我在炮房卫生间洗漱,点名曰男士澡堂。 洗完老师已换好情趣战袍,香艳的场景已经无法再坚持片刻。镜子前69,身材曲线一览无余,S腰,夺命大长腿(比评论区网友命加一起都长),将一条大长腿伸到一边,另一条横在床头,近距离看犹如车库抬杆一般横在空中,细长笔直,作为资深腿控,此时依然进入亢奋状态,老师口活温柔,不着急吸吮肉棒,用柔软的舌头打圈,然后去从根部慢慢过渡到冠状沟;酥酥麻麻加持一双玉腿,小头已然快喷涌而出…
❤1
Signed 图一
匿名报告 【艺名】:#图一 【价格】:2000 【位置】:普陀 【联系方式】:@hztt5202 【身材样貌】:御姐型 175完美身材 【服务过程】:图一老师性格活泼又温柔,第一眼漂亮,越看越耐看,越看越漂亮。配合度很高,很轻松愉快的体验。感觉刚出门又想见她了,身上有种骚骚的劲,不明显但耐人寻味,高级。身材特别好,腰臀比绝了,大长腿我根本都移不开眼,是我喜欢的类型,颜值气质都出众,让人眼前一亮。课室非常干净,我喜欢爱干净的女生。环境高档,私密性强,心安才能玩的开心。 标签: @hztt5202 #图一 2000p #普陀 点击跳转原始报告【需先加群】 反馈狼友: 匿名狼友 时间:2026-08-04 23:28:54 报告ID:16469 当前进度:1/4
❤1
Signed 图一
🌈魔都探花榜上榜链接 https://t.me/thxhyly/13312 🌟每周有积分抽奖或竞拍白嫖活动 ✨👉 魔都探花免验群 👈 ✨ 👉魔都探花主频道 👈 ❤️赶快进群赚积分参与吧! 上榜联系: @tbot96_bot 📝作业反馈 @mdth888_bot 有积分
Signed 图一
@hztt5202 图一,少见的人照一致的御姐,昨天还发誓再不找大车了,感觉大车都比较宽松,导致本人气喘吁吁了还出不来,也可能是本人二弟比较纤细吧😳 直到去了图一,你说她大车吧,172的身高,100的体重,有腰有胸有屁股。你说她小车吧,踩个恨天高比我还高。 颜值高,身材好,皮肤雪白顺滑,妹妹水润紧致,态度也好,值回票钱,完美的cj,下次再来👍
❤1
Signed 图一
明天开课 宝宝们可以提前预约
❤1
Signed 图一
还没开哦 开了会发频道的宝宝们
❤1
Signed 图一
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @xiaoshuixiaobaikunmi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@xiaoshuixiaobaikunmi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“图一开课群” (@xiaoshuixiaobaikunmi), 2,517 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoshuixiaobaikunmi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.